Cook led the Spartans late.
After the season Mark Dantonio and Co. endured, can you be at all surprised by their bowl performance?
- Jack Ebling
- Columnist - SpartanTailgate
-
Spartan89 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1502 votes total - (1715)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Bender
- 5 stars Rating: 81
5220 votes total - Μολὼν λαβέ
- (6827)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
organman66 said...
Jack,
For once, I can't agree with all the praises you're receiving for this negative article. Yes, luck played a role in this victory, although without a fantastic punt under pressure, and excellent pursuit by Williams, it's just another bad bounce. And then without a great field goal under pressure by a kicker who has been often criticized, it doesn't matter anyway. That's three excellent plays in closing out a victory, which, while aided by a bad decision on their part (which is also not luck), we earned the victory. I'm so tired of the critics being quick to note that no matter how many bad breaks, bad calls, etc. hurt the Spartans, somehow it's still their fault for not 'closing'. But when they do close, now it's all about the lucky Spartans. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways, but for some reason, berating the Spartans has become the 'cool' thing to do. So, sorry, I don't think it was such a 'great read'.The Doctor ●
- 4 stars Rating: 67
12458 votes total - RCMB Moderator
- (7424)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
organman66 said...
Jack, For once, I can't agree with all the praises you're receiving for this negative article. Yes, luck played a role in this victory, although without a fantastic punt under pressure, and excellent pursuit by Williams, it's just another bad bounce. And then without a great field goal under pressure by a kicker who has been often criticized, it doesn't matter anyway. That's three excellent plays in closing out a victory, which, while aided by a bad decision on their part (which is also not luck), we earned the victory. I'm so tired of the critics being quick to note that no matter how many bad breaks, bad calls, etc. hurt the Spartans, somehow it's still their fault for not 'closing'. But when they do close, now it's all about the lucky Spartans. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways, but for some reason, berating the Spartans has become the 'cool' thing to do. So, sorry, I don't think it was such a 'great read'.
This post was edited by JEK on 1/1/2013 at 10:00 AM
-
spartan 4show
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1019 votes total - Seth Mitchell Ate My Baby!!!
- (845)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
organman66 said...
Jack,
For once, I can't agree with all the praises you're receiving for this negative article. Yes, luck played a role in this victory, although without a fantastic punt under pressure, and excellent pursuit by Williams, it's just another bad bounce. And then without a great field goal under pressure by a kicker who has been often criticized, it doesn't matter anyway. That's three excellent plays in closing out a victory, which, while aided by a bad decision on their part (which is also not luck), we earned the victory. I'm so tired of the critics being quick to note that no matter how many bad breaks, bad calls, etc. hurt the Spartans, somehow it's still their fault for not 'closing'. But when they do close, now it's all about the lucky Spartans. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways, but for some reason, berating the Spartans has become the 'cool' thing to do. So, sorry, I don't think it was such a 'great read'.
Already have an account? Sign In
Jack Ebling
1232 votes total