-
TPain151807 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
6673 votes total - (7105)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Wheatley6 said...
Im not going to nit pick your post too much but the MSU offensive line is a big what if, as they struggled last year and finished 11th of 12 teams in rushing. This was with the benefit of an excellent pasing game and good backs. This board seems to think that the mediocre line last year is Alabama all of a sudden.
Your recievers, or lack therof of any with significant playing time is a big what if, including Arnett. Your right about your QB being a big what if.
Let me point this out once again since you didnt comprehend what I posted. According to the numbers which SpartanRocky posted the MSU defense was a total of 9 yards better per game than UM in conference games. This included the difference in schedule! Without the adjustment for schedule UM was actually better defensively in conference play.
BTW the UM center this year is former high 4 star Ricky Barnum who switched over from guard and was going to start last year before being injured. The coaches love him there and say he is a perfect fit.IHateWeberState ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
1058 votes total - (823)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Wheatley6 said...
Im not going to nit pick your post too much but the MSU offensive line is a big what if, as they struggled last year and finished 11th of 12 teams in rushing. This was with the benefit of an excellent pasing game and good backs. This board seems to think that the mediocre line last year is Alabama all of a sudden. Your recievers, or lack therof of any with significant playing time is a big what if, including Arnett. Your right about your QB being a big what if. Let me point this out once again since you didnt comprehend what I posted. According to the numbers which SpartanRocky posted the MSU defense was a total of 9 yards better per game than UM in conference games. This included the difference in schedule! Without the adjustment for schedule UM was actually better defensively in conference play. BTW the UM center this year is former high 4 star Ricky Barnum who switched over from guard and was going to start last year before being injured. The coaches love him there and say he is a perfect fit.
-
Wheatley6 said...
Im not going to nit pick your post too much but the MSU offensive line is a big what if, as they struggled last year and finished 11th of 12 teams in rushing. This was with the benefit of an excellent pasing game and good backs. This board seems to think that the mediocre line last year is Alabama all of a sudden.
Your recievers, or lack therof of any with significant playing time is a big what if, including Arnett. Your right about your QB being a big what if.
Let me point this out once again since you didnt comprehend what I posted. According to the numbers which SpartanRocky posted the MSU defense was a total of 9 yards better per game than UM in conference games. This included the difference in schedule! Without the adjustment for schedule UM was actually better defensively in conference play.
BTW the UM center this year is former high 4 star Ricky Barnum who switched over from guard and was going to start last year before being injured. The coaches love him there and say he is a perfect fit.This post was edited by Rogue Leader on 5/12/2012 at 2:46 PM
"Losing Benenoch is a mortal blow from which this program can't recover"-T-Pain
Rogue Leader
- 5 stars Rating: 84
12597 votes total - (9472)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
aroz13 said...
um played a shortened game against WMU, a Marquise Gray-less Minny, had 8 home games, and didn't play against either of the top 2 statistical offensive teams in the B1G. MSU played 3 games against said teams, didn't have 8 home games, and STILL finished in the top 10 in the country in scoring defense.
Bad troll.
-
TheBlitzIsOn
- 5 stars Rating: 91
7149 votes total - (10809)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TPain151807 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
6673 votes total - (7105)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TheBlitzIsOn
- 5 stars Rating: 91
7149 votes total - (10809)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TPain151807 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
6673 votes total - (7105)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
ass dan said...
They played WMU, EMU and SDSU. Not sure what you're getting at here. They played a lot of team that weren't very good, where MSU played a much tougher schedule. To say that I'm twisting stats to make MSU look better than SCum is ignorant.
It's simple. the Wolvies played a much lighter schedule, and gave up almost a half a yard more per play. They ranked 46th in total defense, while MSU was fifth. That tells the entire story.
-
TPain151807 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
6673 votes total - (7105)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ... | 17


247 B1G Predictions: scUM to the Rose Bowl