Online Now 2713

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2017
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2714
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

247 B1G Predictions: scUM to the Rose Bowl

  • Our offensive line would have had a little more success if Burkland doesn't break his ankle against ND.

    ass dan

  • HAHA

    Smitdog676746 posts
    Little brother is so bitter that it's funny. You should really be worried about your own team, namely your offense without Captain Kirk and BJ. I could maybe see them winning 5 games if they get some breaks and flukey bounces.

    TPain151807

  • Wheatley6 said...

    Im not going to nit pick your post too much but the MSU offensive line is a big what if, as they struggled last year and finished 11th of 12 teams in rushing. This was with the benefit of an excellent pasing game and good backs. This board seems to think that the mediocre line last year is Alabama all of a sudden.
    Your recievers, or lack therof of any with significant playing time is a big what if, including Arnett. Your right about your QB being a big what if.
    Let me point this out once again since you didnt comprehend what I posted. According to the numbers which SpartanRocky posted the MSU defense was a total of 9 yards better per game than UM in conference games. This included the difference in schedule! Without the adjustment for schedule UM was actually better defensively in conference play.
    BTW the UM center this year is former high 4 star Ricky Barnum who switched over from guard and was going to start last year before being injured. The coaches love him there and say he is a perfect fit.

    Let me repost this for you:

    Entire season: MSU D was 5th in the country in yds/play. UofM was 46th.
    In conference: MSU D was 1st. UofM was 5th, a full half yard worse per play.

    The defenses weren't even comparable.

    IHateWeberState

  • IHateWeberState said...

    Let me repost this for you:

    Entire season: MSU D was 5th in the country in yds/play. UofM was 46th. In conference: MSU D was 1st. UofM was 5th, a full half yard worse per play.

    The defenses weren't even comparable.

    Why would you choose to measure defensive strength with this statistic?

    Dontbeahomer

  • Wheatley6 said...

    Im not going to nit pick your post too much but the MSU offensive line is a big what if, as they struggled last year and finished 11th of 12 teams in rushing. This was with the benefit of an excellent pasing game and good backs. This board seems to think that the mediocre line last year is Alabama all of a sudden. Your recievers, or lack therof of any with significant playing time is a big what if, including Arnett. Your right about your QB being a big what if. Let me point this out once again since you didnt comprehend what I posted. According to the numbers which SpartanRocky posted the MSU defense was a total of 9 yards better per game than UM in conference games. This included the difference in schedule! Without the adjustment for schedule UM was actually better defensively in conference play. BTW the UM center this year is former high 4 star Ricky Barnum who switched over from guard and was going to start last year before being injured. The coaches love him there and say he is a perfect fit.

    So, MSU had 2 first team, 4 second team, and 5 honorable mention All B1G performers last year on defense. 8 of them come back.

    um had 1 second team, 5 honorable mention. 4 are coming back.

    BTW, the majority of the MSU players on those teams were underclassmen (Rush, Dennard, Gholston, Bullough, Allen, Lewis). 3rd in the country in sacks(um 30th) 11th in ints (um 85th) Again, those guys are all coming back. I understand your desire to use the numbers that are in your favor. What I will say is this. MSU's defense was a top 10 unit last year, they will be better this year. UM's wasn't last year, and they lost more than MSU did. The upside for MSU's defense is off the charts. They pass the eye test, um doesn't.

    The OL looked bad for a good portion of the year because MSU was starting 2 freshmen and a JUCO transfer (who turned out to be pretty good) and were missing 2 starters. By the end of the year, they were pretty good. 6 OL with a lot of experience and a bowl victory to their credit. And let me get this straight. Your 4* player who has never played C is a stud, our 4* QB is a question mark. Idiot.

    aroz13

  • Wasn't UM's defense in the top ten in scoring? Also, MSU's had 966 yards rushing through the first seven games, and 965 through the last 7, so I'm not sure the OL argument really works.

    This post was edited by Dontbeahomer on 5/12/2012 at 2:43 PM

    Dontbeahomer

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    Wasn't UM's defense in the top ten in scoring?

    Yeah, but it was pretty clear that MSU's defense was much better. We played Wisky twice, SCum played them 0 times. 31 and 42 points will take a toll on your scoring defense, yardage per game is a more accurate representation of a defense's abilities.

    ps: Fuck off.

    ass dan

  • Wheatley6 said...

    Im not going to nit pick your post too much but the MSU offensive line is a big what if, as they struggled last year and finished 11th of 12 teams in rushing. This was with the benefit of an excellent pasing game and good backs. This board seems to think that the mediocre line last year is Alabama all of a sudden.
    Your recievers, or lack therof of any with significant playing time is a big what if, including Arnett. Your right about your QB being a big what if.
    Let me point this out once again since you didnt comprehend what I posted. According to the numbers which SpartanRocky posted the MSU defense was a total of 9 yards better per game than UM in conference games. This included the difference in schedule! Without the adjustment for schedule UM was actually better defensively in conference play.
    BTW the UM center this year is former high 4 star Ricky Barnum who switched over from guard and was going to start last year before being injured. The coaches love him there and say he is a perfect fit.

    Name the last season MSU had a poor wide receiver unit. Thanks and good luck. This is WRU.

    Edit: you have a 4 star replacing molk??!?!? Wow!! You guys will be all set when you face teams with 200lb defensive linemen and 180lb linebackers.

    This post was edited by Rogue Leader on 5/12/2012 at 2:46 PM

    "Losing Benenoch is a mortal blow from which this program can't recover"-T-Pain

    Rogue Leader

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    Wasn't UM's defense in the top ten in scoring? Also, MSU's had 966 yards rushing through the first seven games, and 965 through the last 7, so I'm not sure the OL argument really works.

    um played a shortened game against WMU, a Marquise Gray-less Minny, had 8 home games, and didn't play against either of the top 2 statistical offensive teams in the B1G. MSU played 3 games against said teams, didn't have 8 home games, and STILL finished in the top 10 in the country in scoring defense. 19th in sacks allowed on offense, and the running game was better in YPC (mainly due to Bell getting more carries). If you couldn't see the improvement in MSU's OL from the beginning of the year against YSU to the end of the year against Georgia then I just don't know what to tell you.

    Bad troll.

    This post was edited by aroz13 on 5/12/2012 at 2:56 PM

    aroz13

  • Rogue Leader said...

    Name the last season MSU had a poor wide receiver unit. Thanks and good luck. This is WRU.

    Edit: you have a 4 star replacing molk??!?!? Wow!! You guys will be all set when you face teams with 200lb defensive linemen and 180lb linebackers.

    Isn't Barnum the guy from two years ago who couldn't snap the ball out of shotgun?

    ass dan

  • ass dan said...

    Yeah, but it was pretty clear that MSU's defense was much better. We played Wisky twice, SCum played them 0 times. 31 and 42 points will take a toll on your scoring defense, yardage per game is a more accurate representation of a defense's abilities.

    ps: Fuck off.

    Well he was measuring in yds/play, which makes no sense. Yds/game makes more sense, but I still find it pointless considering that stat doesn't make it on the scoreboard. I'm not questioning that MSU's D was better, but there's no sense in twisting the numbers.

    Dontbeahomer

  • aroz13 said...

    um played a shortened game against WMU, a Marquise Gray-less Minny, had 8 home games, and didn't play against either of the top 2 statistical offensive teams in the B1G. MSU played 3 games against said teams, didn't have 8 home games, and STILL finished in the top 10 in the country in scoring defense.

    Bad troll.

    You can always work the stats how you want. Sure, UM didn't play Wisconsin, and that is significant, but they also didn't get to play FAU, YSU, or CMU.

    Dontbeahomer

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    You can always work the stats how you want. Sure, UM didn't play Wisconsin, and that is significant, but they also didn't get to play FAU, YSU, or CMU.

    Western Michigan, Eastern Michigan and SDSU is nothing to be proud about either buddy.

    "We'll play anyone, anyplace, anytime!" - Tom Izzo

    ToxSpartan

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    You can always work the stats how you want. Sure, UM didn't play Wisconsin, and that is significant, but they also didn't get to play FAU, YSU, or CMU.

    But they also DID get to play WMU, EMU, Illinois, SDSU, and Purdue.

    This post was edited by TheBlitzIsOn on 5/12/2012 at 2:56 PM

    signature image

    TheBlitzIsOn

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    You can always work the stats how you want. Sure, UM didn't play Wisconsin, and that is significant, but they also didn't get to play FAU, YSU, or CMU.

    Yeah cuz playing WMU and SDSU is sooooo much better

    Get lost troll

    Time to head back to mgoblow

    TPain151807

  • ToxSpartan said...

    Western Michigan, Eastern Michigan and SDSU is nothing to be proud about either buddy.

    No, but Western was 18th in scoring and SDSU was 46th, not 119th.

    Dontbeahomer

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    You can always work the stats how you want. Sure, UM didn't play Wisconsin, and that is significant, but they also didn't get to play FAU, YSU, or CMU.

    They played WMU, EMU and SDSU. Not sure what you're getting at here. They played a lot of team that weren't very good, where MSU played a much tougher schedule. To say that I'm twisting stats to make MSU look better than SCum is ignorant.

    It's simple. the Wolvies played a much lighter schedule, and gave up almost a half a yard more per play. They ranked 46th in total defense, while MSU was fifth. That tells the entire story.

    ass dan

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    Wasn't UM's defense in the top ten in scoring? Also, MSU's had 966 yards rushing through the first seven games, and 965 through the last 7, so I'm not sure the OL argument really works.

    Comparable, not increased. That is how that works. The implication the line would get better as the season progressed, not stayed the same.

    signature image

    TheBlitzIsOn

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    You can always work the stats how you want. Sure, UM didn't play Wisconsin, and that is significant, but they also didn't get to play FAU, YSU, or CMU.

    Idiot. You had a cupcake schedule. WMU > FAU. So fucking what? UW > your entire schedule including your bowl game. We played them twice. You want to tell me how good um's offense is, we slapped you around like a rag doll. You aren't doing a very good job here. Better ask your mom for some mac and cheese and a blanky, get some rest, and try again later.

    aroz13

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    No, but Western was 18th in scoring and SDSU was 46th, not 119th.

    Not hard to be 18th and 46th when you play against MAC and Mountain West competition

    Jesus this Walvie is in denial

    TPain151807

  • ass dan said...

    They played WMU, EMU and SDSU. Not sure what you're getting at here. They played a lot of team that weren't very good, where MSU played a much tougher schedule. To say that I'm twisting stats to make MSU look better than SCum is ignorant.

    It's simple. the Wolvies played a much lighter schedule, and gave up almost a half a yard more per play. They ranked 46th in total defense, while MSU was fifth. That tells the entire story.

    Again, why do you use yds/play? How does that "tell the entire story"?

    Dontbeahomer

  • T-Pain said...

    Not hard to be 18th and 46th when you play against MAC and Mountain West competition

    Jesus this Walvie is in denial

    And FAU, YSU, and CMU are in much more difficult conferences?

    Dontbeahomer

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    No, but Western was 18th in scoring and SDSU was 46th, not 119th.

    attachment

    "We'll play anyone, anyplace, anytime!" - Tom Izzo

    ToxSpartan

  • Dontbeahomer said...

    And FAU, YSU, and CMU are in much more difficult conferences?

    I never said they were

    I'm admitting that those are bad teams, unlike you

    TPain151807

  • It's more representative of the defense and it's efforts. WMU may have been 18th in scoring but if you watched that game, they shit their pants when they got inside the twenty. UM zero blitzed them on passing situations and Carder lost his mind. That doesn't change the fact that WMU marched down the field the whole game, only to turn it over in the end zone. The scoring defense stat is impressive but it doesn't represent how the D actually played.

    ass dan