Online Now 2249

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1376
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2241
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

AC/DC: The Greatest Rock N Roll Band in History

  • I think the biggest point I would make is again, the majority of everything that has ever been claimed as stolen by Zeppelin were lyrics. Lyrics never made them great anyway and were arguably a relative weakness.

    Look at Babe I'm Gonna Leave You. One of my 5 favorite songs of theirs. Lyrics were taken from another song. People love that song for the guitar and how the vocals are phrased.

    This post was edited by SpartanPride204 on 5/13/2012 at 11:21 PM

    SpartanPride204

  • Spartan-Pride said...

    I think the biggest point I would make is again, the majority of everything that has ever been claimed as stolen by Zeppelin were lyrics. Lyrics never made them great anyway and were arguably a relative weakness.

    Look at Babe I'm Gonna Leave You. One of my 5 favorite songs of theirs. Lyrics were taken from another song. People love that song for the guitar and how the vocals are phrased.

    Watch the video - it's more than the lyrics. And even when you only use someone else's lyrics, you're supposed to give them credit. Why do you say that it's "claimed" that this happened, as if it's even debatable? It's completely backed up by actual audio. They stole lyrics, riffs, melodies, and sometimes almost whole songs and put their own names on them - not just as performers, but as composers. This isn't an opinion or a "claim", it's a fact.

    Pervis Muldoon

  • Pervis Muldoon said...

    Watch the video - it's more than the lyrics. And even when you only use someone else's lyrics, you're supposed to give them credit. Why do you say that it's "claimed" that this happened, as if it's even debatable? It's completely backed up by actual audio. They stole lyrics, riffs, melodies, and sometimes almost whole songs and put their own names on them - not just as performers, but as composers. This isn't an opinion or a "claim", it's a fact.

    If you want to debate how much they stole, fine.

    But saying they're not the greatest rock band ever because in their early days they were basically a blues cover band whose guitar player wasn't good with giving people credit...don't understand that.

    They were doing the same things everyone else was, only they were much worse than most about giving credits on songs like I Cant Quit You Baby, The Killing Floor (Lemon Song), How Many More Times, that everyone else was covering. Not giving proper credit on covers is not really equaling "ACDC > Zeppelin" to me.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by SpartanPride204 on 5/13/2012 at 11:43 PM

    SpartanPride204

  • Spartan-Pride said...

    A few things,

    1) The very vast majority of their material was not 'stolen' 2) The majority of material that Zeppelin "stole" was lyrics; who listens to Zeppelin for the lyrics? 3) Anything they "stole" was almost always dramatically different (see: Whole Lotta Love, Dazed and Confused)

    actually, Jimmy Page was probably the biggest progenitor of their plagiarized stuff....he blatantly ripped off the Yardbirds, Jeff Beck, and artists who played with them in addition to numerous blues artists. Plant was culpable in a lot of it too, but Page was by far the most shameless about it all. The fact that he immediately started lying about very obvious things doesn't help his case any.

    signature image

    boozhoo

  • boozhoo said...

    actually, Jimmy Page was probably the biggest progenitor of their plagiarized stuff....he blatantly ripped off the Yardbirds, Jeff Beck, and artists who played with them in addition to numerous blues artists. Plant was culpable in a lot of it too, but Page was by far the most shameless about it all. The fact that he immediately started lying about very obvious things doesn't help his case any.

    Off the top of my head I would have to disagree:

    Music rips:
    Some of Dazed and Confused
    some of The Lemon Song
    Moby Dick
    Black Mountain Side
    Drum into Rock and Roll

    Lyrical rips:
    Babe I'm Gonna Leave You
    Dazed and Confused
    You Shook Me
    Communication Breakdown
    I Cant Quit You Baby
    How Many More Times
    Whole Lotta Love
    Bring it on Home
    When the Levee Breaks

    Or maybe this is just evidence that as a musician my opinion of what a musical ripoff is is much looser than most.

    This post was edited by SpartanPride204 on 5/14/2012 at 12:00 AM

    SpartanPride204

  • Spartan-Pride said...

    Off the top of my head I would have to disagree:

    Music rips: Some of Dazed and Confused, some of The Lemon Song, Moby Dick, Black Mountain Side,

    Lyrical rips: Babe I'm Gonna Leave You, Dazed and Confused, You Shook Me, Communication Breakdown, I Cant Quit You Baby, How Many More Times, Whole Lotta Love, Bring it on Home, When the Levee Breaks

    Or maybe this is just evidence that as a musician my opinion of what a musical ripoff is is much looser than most.

    You're a musician? That's great. Now what I'd like you to do is record "Stairway to Heaven," but maybe with a slightly different tempo and style, or just put those lyrics to a different melody - then put only your name on the writing credits and make sure somebody in the Zeppelin organization hears about it. What do you think would happen?

    This post was edited by Pervis Muldoon on 5/14/2012 at 12:05 AM

    Pervis Muldoon

  • Pervis Muldoon said...

    You're a musician? That's great. Now what I'd like you to do is record "Stairway to Heaven," but maybe with a slightly different tempo and style, or just put those lyrics to a different melody - then put only your name on the writing credits and make sure somebody in the Zeppelin organization hears about it. What do you think would happen?

    I don't believe I have argued that they haven't stolen alot of things.

    My points the entire time have been

    1) Being a blues cover band in the early days with a douchey guitarist doesn't in any way disqualify Zeppelin as the greatest hard rock band ever
    2) The majority of what was stolen were lyrics. Lyrics never made Led Zeppelin.
    Some of the songs (Babe I'm Gonna Leave You), Plant could have been singing "Purple Fudge Farts" and people would have loved it. It wasn't about the lyrics.
    3) Anything they stole was made (with the except of Moby Dick and Black Mountain Side) into completely different things

    If you take the beginning of Dazed and Confused and the beginning of Stairway from Zeppelin (I list these because these are the only two major songs of theirs where parts were taken from other songs), they have still done much much more than ACDC.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by SpartanPride204 on 5/14/2012 at 12:17 AM

    SpartanPride204

  • The thing is I'm not really saying a polar opposite of you. I get what Page did was bad, I just think it's exaggerated and has little to do with where they stand in rock history, as you could take any and all of the songs in question from them and they were still better than ACDC.

    SpartanPride204

  • Pervis Muldoon said...

    I'll be happy to argue this reasonably - no worries there.

    Led Zeppelin did not steal "elements just like everyone else did". Watch the video - most of those aren't mere "influences", they're the actual creators of the songs Led Zeppelin took the writing credits for. And how does Jimmy Page answer to the fact that they stole "Dazed and Confused" from Jake Holmes? "I haven't heard Jake Holmes so I don't know what it's all about anyway. Usually my riffs are pretty damn original - what can I say?"

    If you want to discuss ELP, Yes, or Pink Floyd, show me how they blatantly ripped off other musicians like Led Zeppelin did. Don't just mention the names of other bands and say they did it too - give me some evidence that comes close to Led Zeppelin's blatant thievery.

    Okay, just for the sake of our respectful debate, and mind you I am well past my bedtime and need to get up at 6AM for work, so I'll be pardoning myself after this post.

    Let's stop with the Led Zeppelin stuff because there is so much already documented on them. Let's agree that many artists or bands copy/incorporate/"sample" (as the term is used now with some many electronic musicians) other artists styles. I think that can be an established fact for the sake of our discussion.

    Given that, how can one cry wolf over Led Zeppelin when ELP did the same thing? Examples? Incorporating works from Mussorgsky and Copland. Oh, but they're classical composers and that doesn't count? Copland was still alive when they did what they did. Certainly not public domain if so.

    As for my discussion with Bach, a German composer... was it okay for him to steal a style from the French? Piratically steal the song as a whole? If you know the piece, he practically stole it verbatim and presented it in a German style... loosely speaking for the sake of our discussion.

    We don't cry about those things, but when we speak of Zeppelin we bemoan how they were unoriginal? Who cares? They offered some great stuff in their style, just as the others did too.

    Do you really want to go through all of the other musicians out there that took styles or songs and made them their own? Do you want to really discuss jazz musicians that took a song and made it better, so when we listen to that version we're compelled to smile and perhaps give a welcoming sigh, when in reality it might have been offered several years earlier and the original artist/composer is an afterthought?

    Tell me who you think of when you listen to Elton John singing "But not for me"? Do you think of Gershwin? He's the composer. Do you think of Sinatra? Ella? Maybe Four Weddings and A Funeral?

    Does it really matter?

    The point is just enjoy the music the way the artist is presenting it. If they offer something more than what has come before, AWESOME!

    Sorry to all the rockers out there about the Gershwin YouTube tune attached. It is a good tune though, and a very good version.

    Play

    Elton John sings Gershwin - But Not for Me...

    "But Not for Me" written by George & Ira Gershwin. Vocal by Elton John. Produced by Stephen Lindsey, from the Soundtrack "Four Weddings and a Funeral".

    http://www.youtube.com/v/TLjWdZ3mP5E
    signature image signature image signature image

    FREE YOUR BREASTS! FREE YOUR MIND!

    Archangel

  • Spartan-Pride said...

    I don't believe I have argued that they haven't stolen alot of things.

    My points the entire time have been

    1) Being a blues cover band in the early days with a douchey guitarist doesn't in any way disqualify Zeppelin as the greatest hard rock band ever 2) The majority of what was stolen were lyrics. Lyrics never made Led Zeppelin 3) Anything they stole was made (with the except of Moby Dick and Black Mountain Side) into completely different things

    If you take the beginning of Dazed and Confused and the beginning of Stairway from Zeppelin (I list these because these are the only two major songs of theirs where parts were taken from other songs), they have still done much much more than ACDC.

    The blatant theft isn't the only reason Led Zeppelin isn't the best rock band in history. They didn't last as long as bands like AC/DC, the Stones, and the Heartbreakers, they sang about Hobbits, and "Thank You" is one of the dorkiest songs ever recorded.

    Pervis Muldoon

  • Archangel said...

    Okay, just for the sake of our respectful debate, and mind you I am well past my bedtime and need to get up at 6AM for work, so I'll be pardoning myself after this post.

    Let's stop with the Led Zeppelin stuff because there is so much already documented on them. Let's agree that many artists or bands copy/incorporate/"sample" (as the term is used now with some many electronic musicians) other artists styles. I think that can be an established fact for the sake of our discussion.

    Given that, how can one cry wolf over Led Zeppelin when ELP did the same thing? Examples? Incorporating works from Mussorgsky and Copland. Oh, but they're classical composers and that doesn't count? Copland was still alive when they did what they did. Certainly not public domain if so.

    As for my discussion with Bach, a German composer... was it okay for him to steal a style from the French? Piratically steal the song as a whole? If you know the piece, he practically stole it verbatim and presented it in a German style... loosely speaking for the sake of our discussion.

    We don't cry about those things, but when we speak of Zeppelin we bemoan how they were unoriginal? Who cares? They offered some great stuff in their style, just as the others did too.

    Do you really want to go through all of the other musicians out there that took styles or songs and made them their own? Do you want to really discuss jazz musicians that took a song and made it better, so when we listen to that version we're compelled to smile and perhaps give a welcoming sigh, when in reality it might have been offered several years earlier and the original artist/composer is an afterthought?

    Tell me who you think of when you listen to Elton John singing "But not for me"? Do you think of Gershwin? He's the composer. Do you think of Sinatra? Ella? Maybe Four Weddings and A Funeral?

    Does it really matter?

    The point is just enjoy the music the way the artist is presenting it. If they offer something more than what has come before, AWESOME!

    Sorry to all the rockers out there about the Gershwin YouTube tune attached. It is a good tune though, and a very good version.

    If ELP and Johann stole music and put their names on it, that's a big mark against them as well. It still doesn't excuse what Led Zeppelin did, and neither does Elton John's Gershwin cover. Did Elton claim to have written that themselves?

    I also knock Van Halen because of an overdependence on covers through their career (combined with very short albums, it makes them seem less creative than other bands), but Led Zeppelin were thieves. They could've made up for it after they achieved such incredible success, but they've fought against that. It should always be considered when objectively weighing the merits of that band.

    Pervis Muldoon

  • Archangel said...

    Okay, just for the sake of our respectful debate, and mind you I am well past my bedtime and need to get up at 6AM for work, so I'll be pardoning myself after this post.

    Let's stop with the Led Zeppelin stuff because there is so much already documented on them. Let's agree that many artists or bands copy/incorporate/"sample" (as the term is used now with some many electronic musicians) other artists styles. I think that can be an established fact for the sake of our discussion.

    Given that, how can one cry wolf over Led Zeppelin when ELP did the same thing? Examples? Incorporating works from Mussorgsky and Copland. Oh, but they're classical composers and that doesn't count? Copland was still alive when they did what they did. Certainly not public domain if so.

    As for my discussion with Bach, a German composer... was it okay for him to steal a style from the French? Piratically steal the song as a whole? If you know the piece, he practically stole it verbatim and presented it in a German style... loosely speaking for the sake of our discussion.

    We don't cry about those things, but when we speak of Zeppelin we bemoan how they were unoriginal? Who cares? They offered some great stuff in their style, just as the others did too.

    Do you really want to go through all of the other musicians out there that took styles or songs and made them their own? Do you want to really discuss jazz musicians that took a song and made it better, so when we listen to that version we're compelled to smile and perhaps give a welcoming sigh, when in reality it might have been offered several years earlier and the original artist/composer is an afterthought?

    Tell me who you think of when you listen to Elton John singing "But not for me"? Do you think of Gershwin? He's the composer. Do you think of Sinatra? Ella? Maybe Four Weddings and A Funeral?

    Does it really matter?

    The point is just enjoy the music the way the artist is presenting it. If they offer something more than what has come before, AWESOME!

    Sorry to all the rockers out there about the Gershwin YouTube tune attached. It is a good tune though, and a very good version.

    you are ignoring the MAJOR point: Jimmy page and Robert Plant TOOK CREDIT for those songs and refused to acknowledge the sources. Eric Clapton never did this...neither did the Stones, or the Who, or AC/DC, or any of the other bands out of the UK who were heavily influenced by the blues. Page and Plant made a career out of coopting other's work, tweaking it a bit (or sometimes just flat out stealing it), and then putting their own names in the credits as the composers and writers of the music and lyrics. That's stealing. Not influence, borrowing, sampling, or any other term you want. it's stealing when you take someone else's lyrics, slap them on a slightly altered melody, and then give your self a writing credit. Zeppelin did this a LOT....and it sullies their reputation in my eyes. They were of course a great band....but they are also assholes, and that matters.

    signature image

    boozhoo

  • Count me as one who doesn't care that Zeppelin stole some shit. They made that shit incredible, I don't care who gets the credit. Songwriting credits aren't important to me, good music is important to me, and Zeppelin is way better than AC/DC.

    http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

    iCameron

  • iCameron said...

    Count me as one who doesn't care that Zeppelin stole some shit. They made that shit incredible, I don't care who gets the credit. Songwriting credits aren't important to me, good music is important to me, and Zeppelin is way better than AC/DC.

    You compare AC/DC to Nicholsback? And you expect any of your other opinions to be taken seriously? Bitch please.

    DETFAN22517

  • AC/DC means one of two things. Either I'm about to change the station, or I'm about to cheer unreasonably loud for an animated statue. Or I'm drinking. That's three.

    http://www.silentlapse.com

    Thrillho

  • Pervis Muldoon said...

    The blatant theft isn't the only reason Led Zeppelin isn't the best rock band in history. They didn't last as long as bands like AC/DC, the Stones, and the Heartbreakers, they sang about Hobbits, and "Thank You" is one of the dorkiest songs ever recorded.

    Dumbest post ever. So Derek and the Dominos weren't a great band because they had a short life. And in the case of Zeppelin, does it make a difference that their drummer, a huge part of their sound died while the band was at their peak? You're really being kind of an idiot about this for some reason. Zeppelin is rightly acknowledged by most any rock historian as one of the greatest rock bands of all time. You have something against them, that's fine, but STFU about it all ready and just say you don't like them.

    By the way even the Beatles played covers early in their career and Springsteen does to this very day.

    This post was edited by MSchott on 5/14/2012 at 8:50 AM

    MSchott

  • Greatest? Not IMO. But up there. Their early stuff, so rooted in the blues, is really incredible.

    Angus Young is a guitar god and king of the power chord.

    I must be crazy to be in a loony bin like this.

    RP McMurphy

  • Pervis Muldoon said...

    ...like steal songs from other artists and claim them as their own.

    erybody stole from erybody. that's rock n roll, dude.

    I must be crazy to be in a loony bin like this.

    RP McMurphy

  • iCameron said...

    Calm the fuck down dude. AC/DC was Nickleback before there was Nickleback.

    roflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmaoroflmao

    I must be crazy to be in a loony bin like this.

    RP McMurphy

  • boozhoo said...

    They were of course a great band....but they are also assholes, and that matters.

    And pretty much any band listed in this thread consisted of mid-20 year old men having sex with 14 year old girls.

    SpartanPride204

  • They dirty... Even their "masterpiece". Great blues/rock/hard rock band but they should have given those due their due their due in the first place.

    I freaking love Led Zeppelin I, and seriously every single song is lifted some way or another.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurus_(song)

    This post was edited by Pylon St8ofmind on 5/14/2012 at 11:03 AM

    Unavailable

    Either this website doesn't exist or is not currently available.

    en.wikipedia.org

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind

  • Pervis Muldoon said...

    I'll be happy to argue this reasonably - no worries there.

    Led Zeppelin did not steal "elements just like everyone else did". Watch the video - most of those aren't mere "influences", they're the actual creators of the songs Led Zeppelin took the writing credits for. And how does Jimmy Page answer to the fact that they stole "Dazed and Confused" from Jake Holmes? "I haven't heard Jake Holmes so I don't know what it's all about anyway. Usually my riffs are pretty damn original - what can I say?"

    If you want to discuss ELP, Yes, or Pink Floyd, show me how they blatantly ripped off other musicians like Led Zeppelin did. Don't just mention the names of other bands and say they did it too - give me some evidence that comes close to Led Zeppelin's blatant thievery.

    Zeppelin's riffs were all authentic, and they did it better than anybody else. Comparing Zeppelin to AC/DC is insulting to Led Zeppelin. You can argue that Zeppelin's four parts were as good at their respective instruments/singing as any other performers ever. And Zeppelin took all the music and made it exponentially better. Would you rather listen to Jake Holmes or fucking Zeppelin? You make it sound like they "stole" every song. They adapted songs, like The Beatles adapted Muddy Waters and The Stones adapted The Beatles. Zeppelin just didn't credit the original artists in some cases.

    What is that, a Titleist? A hole in one...

    Cosmo_Kramer

  • I'm not sure it's possible to play any music without it sounding like something else, let alone blues-based music.

    http://www.silentlapse.com

    Thrillho

  • Thrillho said...

    I'm not sure it's possible to play any music without it sounding like something else, let alone blues-based music.

    As anyone who has ever picked up a guitar can tell you, this.

    This post was edited by Omar Comin19758 on 5/14/2012 at 12:40 PM

    signature image

    Omar Comin19758

  • The fact that ACDC's best song (Back in Black) would probably be about 6 or 7 on a list of Zeppelin's best, comparable to something like The Ocean, is all that needs to be said.

    SpartanPride204