-
WBill19542
- 5 stars Rating: 96
14286 votes total - (16681)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PassTheRock
- 3 stars Rating: 58
2272 votes total - (1128)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
LoneWolfSparty
- 4 stars Rating: 66
11298 votes total - Permanently Banned
- (11542)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
sleepy01 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
4701 votes total - ¡ Dale !
- (3404)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Frank Caliendo
- 3 stars Rating: 57
346 votes total - (328)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Final Countdown
- 5 stars Rating: 95
26599 votes total - (9435)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Beardy
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4544 votes total - In the hall of the Mountain King
- (7292)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sleepy01 said...
I think this is correct. The "I graduated from" part is trivial, but if you provided funds to the athletic department I think that is all you need to be qualified as a booster.
Interesting note on the stupidity of that label: You can be a proud alumnus of a school, give donations to its general fund and to its athletic department and be a booster. You can then have a child who is talented enough to possibly play in a given sport for that school. If you encouraged your own child to go to your school, you would be violating NCAA rules. The athlete would also be violating rules if he/she lived with you or took any benefits.
It is stupid, but it is the NCAA.
FTR parents/boosters have been snitched on for providing "benefits" for their children/athletes by jealous coaches, but the NCAA will look the other way when they realize it is a parent/child relationship.
Beardy
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4544 votes total - In the hall of the Mountain King
- (7292)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sleepy01 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
4701 votes total - ¡ Dale !
- (3404)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sleepy01 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
4701 votes total - ¡ Dale !
- (3404)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sleepy01 said...
Interesting note on the stupidity of that label: You can be a proud alumnus of a school, give donations to its general fund and to its athletic department and be a booster. You can then have a child who is talented enough to possibly play in a given sport for that school. If you encouraged your own child to go to your school, you would be violating NCAA rules. The athlete would also be violating rules if he/she lived with you or took any benefits.
-
Spartan_in_PA ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
896 votes total - (1370)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RubberbandMan
- 5 stars Rating: 93
3931 votes total - Billy Yank
- (3022)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
JonEintheD ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
1386 votes total - (4163)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Batesianmimicry ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
2897 votes total - To Dare is to Do
- (5720)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
DWags ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
13664 votes total - D. Wags
- (14605)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars








Am I a booster?