Online Now 2518

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1899
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2386
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Boxing: Pacquaio vs Bradley

  • sarcyspice said...

    just watched it again.... i see an arguement for 1, 2... 10,11 and 12..... but it was mannys right the way thru the middle of that fight.....i scored it 116- 112

    remember this is the same Tim Bradley who turned down the Amir Khan fight to unify all the belts at 140...... even though khan's camp offered him 50/50.....

    mind you... I suppose this way.... it sets up Manny/Bradley 2.... and Khan/Mayweather...... like a 4 way tourney....

    Manny had plenty of chances to knock Bradley out and should have done it. Overall, as I watched the fight I saw Bradley getting his a** kicked. Yes he got in some exchanges with Manny as far as punches go. When a fighter out punches you 253-159 and wins, I question what the judges were watching.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Spartyshannon

  • Spartyshannon said...

    Manny had plenty of chances to knock Bradley out and should have done it. Overall, as I watched the fight I saw Bradley getting his a** kicked. Yes he got in some exchanges with Manny as far as punches go. When a fighter out punches you 253-159 and wins, I question what the judges were watching.

    Bradley has a granite chin. Only guy to ever knock him down, pro or amateur according to Bradley, was Kendall Holt, who did it twice. First knockdown was as flush a shot as anyone has ever been hit with...and Bradley got up. Second knockdown was legit, but might have been a little bit of a flash knockdown/balance issue. Admittedly, no one has ever banged Bradley around like Pacquiao did last night, but to say Manny had plenty of chances to knock out Bradley is selling Bradley's chin short.

    0915426A

  • I quit watching boxing after Hearns- Leonard II

    VeniceSpartan

  • Did anyone see that Bradley tweeted a pic of the poster for the rematch... 12 days ago

    signature image

    For the love of Trevor...™

    d mcc

  • Top Rank's Bob Arum, who promotes Pacquiao and Bradley, was stunned. He said he had it 118-110 for Pacquiao.

    "When I came into the ring [after the fight], I said to Tim, 'You did very well,' and he said 'I tried hard and I couldn't beat the guy. You talk about killing boxing. Even [Bradley's manager, Cameron Dunkin] had it 8-4 for Pacquiao.

    "Something like this is so outlandish, it's a death knell for the sport. This is f------ nuts. I have both guys, and I'll make a lot of money in the rematch, but it's ridiculous. You have these old f---- who don't know what the hell they're looking at. It's incompetence. Nobody who knows anything about boxing could have Bradley ahead in the fight."

    mentalstate

  • mentalstate said...

    Top Rank's Bob Arum, who promotes Pacquiao and Bradley, was stunned. He said he had it 118-110 for Pacquiao.

    "When I came into the ring [after the fight], I said to Tim, 'You did very well,' and he said 'I tried hard and I couldn't beat the guy. You talk about killing boxing. Even [Bradley's manager, Cameron Dunkin] had it 8-4 for Pacquiao.

    "Something like this is so outlandish, it's a death knell for the sport. This is f------ nuts. I have both guys, and I'll make a lot of money in the rematch, but it's ridiculous. You have these old f---- who don't know what the hell they're looking at. It's incompetence. Nobody who knows anything about boxing could have Bradley ahead in the fight."

    Until Bob Arum dies, Pac vs Mayweather never happens. Bob Arum rigged that fight last night and I will not watch the next fight.

    La Flama Blanca

  • La Flama Blanca said...

    Until Bob Arum dies, Pac vs Mayweather never happens. Bob Arum rigged that fight last night and I will not watch the next fight.

    From the link:

    "Bob Arum is the most powerful man in boxing! As the man behind the Top Rank promotional firm, Arum, a Harvard graduate in the late 1950s, became a United States Attorney under then Attorney General Robert Kennedy. While collecting tax money from a Sonny Liston heavyweight title defense circa 1962, Arum was bitten by the boxing bug. After the assassination of President John Kennedy, Arum felt the need to resign his position with the “G” and became a boxing promoter.

    PUT THIS “QUOTE” ON ARUM’S TOMBSTONE!
    With Muhammad Ali his first client, Arum has been involved in big fights since the mid 1960s. His most famous quote is, “Yesterday I was lying, but today I’m telling the truth.”

    MET WITH & THEN SENT BRIBE MONEY TO LEE
    In the mid 1990s, Arum committed a host of Felonies when he admittedly gave then IBF President Bob Lee over $100,000 as a “bribe” to allow George Foreman, then heavyweight champ, to fight Axel Schultz instead of a top contender. He accomplished this by laundering the money through Europe with then booking agent Stan Hoffman. Shortly thereafter, Arum admitted such in a US Dept. of Justice affidavit that was published here at RingTalk.com. The fallout saw Arum fined in a number of states, while unable to promote in Arizona.

    GRR Spartan

  • I'm absolutely stunned (as much as I can be I guess) by this.

    Manny should have stepped on his throat a bit more when he had him compromised.

    And I guess REALLY PUSHING IT a 115-113 for Manny is reasonable, so 115-113 for Bradley can't be that wildly out of line... but it just is in this case. Punchstat isn't everything, but it usually lines up with the best judges. Which for the most part these were.

    I'd say I had aboot 117-111 for Manny. I thought Manny coasted and just tried to win the last :45 or so seconds of the rounds too often and perhaps the judges were trying not to give him credit for 'stealing' rounds.

    Also Bradley blocked a lot more than it looked like he did, and did land clean a lot, he just lacks the pop for it to really show.

    This post was edited by Pylon St8ofmind on 6/10/2012 at 2:26 PM

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind

  • VargMan said...

    good theory...the only problem with it is that it is Mayweather that is hiding behind some phony drug testing scheme and avoiding the fight. The existing rules are just fine and Manny's walking around weight is 150 pounds. He is 5'6 and his weight fits perfectly in the middle of the weight range for people his height with his frame.

    Look at Manny. Hardly huge at all, especially compared to Bradley. Mayweather is a pussy. Pacquiao's power comes from his legs, which are huge and it doesn't take roids to build big calves.

    Wife is still pissed but wore her Pacquiao shirt out to the gym in support of her countryman who got totally hosed last night.

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo

  • Enrico Palazzo said...

    Look at Manny. Hardly huge at all, especially compared to Bradley. Mayweather is a pussy. Pacquiao's power comes from his legs, which are huge and it doesn't take roids to build big calves.

    I'd like to point out that you don't have to get bigger to be on PEDs. Berto just tested positive and he's been fighting at welterweight his whole career.

    signature image

    I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war.

    GhettoHeisman

  • Enrico Palazzo said...

    Look at Manny. Hardly huge at all, especially compared to Bradley. Mayweather is a pussy. Pacquiao's power comes from his legs, which are huge and it doesn't take roids to build big calves.

    Wife is still pissed but wore her Pacquiao shirt out to the gym in support of her countryman who got totally hosed last night.

    Mayweather is not who Pacquaio wanted to fight after Marquez exposed poor defense against an accomplished counter puncher. Pacquiao looked awful against Marquez

    I know you really dislike Mayweather but "pussy"? Really?

    5-5-07 Mayweather beats DeLaHoya in a split decision
    12-6-08 Pacquaio beats DeLaHoya when Oscar doesn't come out for the 9th round

    12-8-07 Mayweather stops Hatten in the 10th rd TKO
    5-2-09 Pacquaio stops hatten in 2 KO

    9-19-09 Mayweather beats Marquez UD
    11-12-11 Pacquaio Beats Marquez in MD

    5-1-10 Mayweather beats Mosely
    5-7-11 Pacquiao beats Mosely

    Arum has this habit of scheduling fighters for Pacquiao AFTER they fight Mayweather.

    GRR Spartan

  • I just watched this and want to observe that these compubox numbers were some of the most ridiculous I've ever seen. I think they probably scored a power shot for Pacquiao after touching gloves coming out of an inadvertant headbutt. I refuse to even consider them after how bad they were last night.

    I also refuse to be swayed by the idiots on HBO. I think the biggest travesty of the night was the HBO commentators pretending like the rounds weren't close and the fight wasn't hanging in the balance in the late rounds. They focused completely on Pacquiao and refused to acknowledge what Bradley was able to do. It is unfathomable to me that after 10 rounds Lampley and Lederman were talking about a shutout. I could understand anyone scoring the fight from anywhere between Pacquiao 8-4 to Bradley 8-4 (yes, and there were that many close rounds), but to score it 119-109 like some of these people is mind blowing to me. It was simply a close fight, and no bigger travesty than Pac getting yet another decision over JMM last fall in an equally close fight.

    ArtieLuvPancake

  • ArtieLuvPancake said...

    I just watched this and want to observe that these compubox numbers were some of the most ridiculous I've ever seen. I think they probably scored a power shot for Pacquiao after touching gloves coming out of an inadvertant headbutt. I refuse to even consider them after how bad they were last night.

    I also refuse to be swayed by the idiots on HBO. I think the biggest travesty of the night was the HBO commentators pretending like the rounds weren't close and the fight wasn't hanging in the balance in the late rounds. They focused completely on Pacquiao and refused to acknowledge what Bradley was able to do. It is unfathomable to me that after 10 rounds Lampley and Lederman were talking about a shutout. I could understand anyone scoring the fight from anywhere between Pacquiao 8-4 to Bradley 8-4 (yes, and there were that many close rounds), but to score it 119-109 like some of these people is mind blowing to me. It was simply a close fight, and no bigger travesty than Pac getting yet another decision over JMM last fall in an equally close fight.

    I agree- the overall telecast contributed to the feeling Pac just ran over Bradley. After thinking about it for a day I'm not nearly as outraged as before. Bradley did hang in there. He rallied in the late rounds. Manny took a ton of time off during the rounds.

    ErnieMcCracken

  • ArtieLuvPancake said...

    I just watched this and want to observe that these compubox numbers were some of the most ridiculous I've ever seen. I think they probably scored a power shot for Pacquiao after touching gloves coming out of an inadvertant headbutt. I refuse to even consider them after how bad they were last night.

    I also refuse to be swayed by the idiots on HBO. I think the biggest travesty of the night was the HBO commentators pretending like the rounds weren't close and the fight wasn't hanging in the balance in the late rounds. They focused completely on Pacquiao and refused to acknowledge what Bradley was able to do. It is unfathomable to me that after 10 rounds Lampley and Lederman were talking about a shutout. I could understand anyone scoring the fight from anywhere between Pacquiao 8-4 to Bradley 8-4 (yes, and there were that many close rounds), but to score it 119-109 like some of these people is mind blowing to me. It was simply a close fight, and no bigger travesty than Pac getting yet another decision over JMM last fall in an equally close fight.

    Dude you are an idiot. I don't care how much you say Bradley was "able to do" he got his ass beat. And 99% of us agree. I mean look at his wife she look horrified the whole time. He's a weak puncher who is either to dumb or too stubborn to know when to quit. His own corner was asking him if he wanted to continue at one point so spare me. Manny looked to be in the drivers seat pretty much the entire fight.

    NoNeed2Bluff

  • This wasn't like the 2nd Pacquiao/Marquez bout or Mayweather/DeLaHoya decision where one could make an argument on how close the fight may have been.

    By almost every measure used to judge boxing matches Pacquaio won. More punch landed, more effective punches.

    The only "idiots" here will be those believing Arum's post fight comments regarding the judging were genuine. Arum has both fighters under contract. If Arum loses anything its reduced PPV dollars for the rematch. Arum has become a very wealth man by paying fighters less through the intricacies of he management fee contracts. What this fight may do is reduce US interest in the rematch but Arum will still make millions if he can make his PPV deal with ABS-CBN Corp that controls the 6 largest cable providers in the Phillipines along with the 4 or 5 satellite providers in the Phillippines.

    Unless Bradley would defeat Pacquiao by KO or TKO a rematch, a Mayweather / Pacquaio fight would still set records.

    GRR Spartan

  • ArtieLuvPancake said...

    I just watched this and want to observe that these compubox numbers were some of the most ridiculous I've ever seen. I think they probably scored a power shot for Pacquiao after touching gloves coming out of an inadvertant headbutt. I refuse to even consider them after how bad they were last night.

    I also refuse to be swayed by the idiots on HBO. I think the biggest travesty of the night was the HBO commentators pretending like the rounds weren't close and the fight wasn't hanging in the balance in the late rounds. They focused completely on Pacquiao and refused to acknowledge what Bradley was able to do. It is unfathomable to me that after 10 rounds Lampley and Lederman were talking about a shutout. I could understand anyone scoring the fight from anywhere between Pacquiao 8-4 to Bradley 8-4 (yes, and there were that many close rounds), but to score it 119-109 like some of these people is mind blowing to me. It was simply a close fight, and no bigger travesty than Pac getting yet another decision over JMM last fall in an equally close fight.

    Hahaa...you wanted Bradley to win. I'm like this when the fighter I want to win is getting dominated. I only see the good things my guy does and then get all mad when the announcers don't recognize it. Like when Cotto fought Mayweather...Of course, Manny beat up Bradley worse than Mayweather beat up Cotto.

    As for those making a big deal about the rematch poster that Bradley tweeted...I believe the contract was set up so that an automatic rematch would occur should Bradley win the fight. So, the rematch poster was just a way for Bradley to say that he was going to win this fight. No conspiracy there.

    tVargMan Prime

  • NoNeed2Bluff said...

    Dude you are an idiot. I don't care how much you say Bradley was "able to do" he got his ass beat. And 99% of us agree. I mean look at his wife she look horrified the whole time. He's a weak puncher who is either to dumb or too stubborn to know when to quit. His own corner was asking him if he wanted to continue at one point so spare me. Manny looked to be in the drivers seat pretty much the entire fight.

    You come off brilliant in this post. Let me tell you that first...

    The wives always look rattled.

    I'll start off by saying Manny won the fight in my eyes. 116-112 or 117-111.

    To his fault though he looked bad/lazy at times because he also coasted for huge parts of rounds, and was missing wildly a lot when he did miss.

    I can legitimately see Bradley winning 1,2,10,11,12. You only need 3 other rounds out of 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 to win 115-113.

    I don't think it's right, and I don't agree with it, but I think I see how it's possible, and possibly even legitimate.

    Bradley did tend to move forward more, DID throw more punches and more jabs which will often be rewarded by bad/lazy judging.

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind

  • VargMan said...

    Hahaa...you wanted Bradley to win. I'm like this when the fighter I want to win is getting dominated. I only see the good things my guy does and then get all mad when the announcers don't recognize it. Like when Cotto fought Mayweather...Of course, Manny beat up Bradley worse than Mayweather beat up Cotto.

    As for those making a big deal about the rematch poster that Bradley tweeted...I believe the contract was set up so that an automatic rematch would occur should Bradley win the fight. So, the rematch poster was just a way for Bradley to say that he was going to win this fight. No conspiracy there.

    I didn't "want" anyone to win. I watched the fight over 24 hours after it happened, so I already knew what happened and who won.

    I just simply saw a close fight, and find the 119-109 Pacquiao cards way more laughable than 115-113 Bradley.

    I think Bradley won rounds 1,2, 10, 11, and 12. I just thought HBO did a really bad job telling the story of a close fight. And I think compubox numbers were a joke. They gave Bradley 9 landed punches in the 2nd round, the round where he landed 10-20 times with his right hand during that clinch with Pacquiao.

    ArtieLuvPancake

  • ArtieLuvPancake said...

    I just watched this and want to observe that these compubox numbers were some of the most ridiculous I've ever seen. I think they probably scored a power shot for Pacquiao after touching gloves coming out of an inadvertant headbutt. I refuse to even consider them after how bad they were last night.

    I also refuse to be swayed by the idiots on HBO. I think the biggest travesty of the night was the HBO commentators pretending like the rounds weren't close and the fight wasn't hanging in the balance in the late rounds. They focused completely on Pacquiao and refused to acknowledge what Bradley was able to do. It is unfathomable to me that after 10 rounds Lampley and Lederman were talking about a shutout. I could understand anyone scoring the fight from anywhere between Pacquiao 8-4 to Bradley 8-4 (yes, and there were that many close rounds), but to score it 119-109 like some of these people is mind blowing to me. It was simply a close fight, and no bigger travesty than Pac getting yet another decision over JMM last fall in an equally close fight.

    I was at the fight, and therefore not swayed by announcers (although I suppose you could argue I was swayed by 10,000 loud Filipinos, even though the folks near me were mostly cheering for Bradley).
    I do respect that Bradley kept coming into the late rounds, and I was disappointed that Manny was unable to take him out when I thought he should have. That being said, I thought Manny won the fight going away.
    I guess you could say that there were that many close rounds, but only if you're rewarding less effective work. With loose criteria for what makes a "close round", you could argue that there were that many close rounds in the Mayweather-Cotto fight, too, but I think the judges were right on with that one and the scorecards accurately reflected Floyd's advantage. I'd say this fight was similar...Bradley kept coming, much like Cotto, and Pacquiao came away with the better of the exchanges on most occasions, even in the later rounds.
    Here's where I'm at with the bigger picture:
    Although I'm a Manny fan, I've come around to the line of thinking that Arum is at fault for the fact that the 2 best fighters in a generation, who fight at the same weight, appear that they will never meet (and if they do, it will be way past the point at which it would have been most competitive). At this point, I don't think Manny beats Floyd anyhow. Given Manny's last 3 fights: not being able to take out Shane despite dominating him, probably losing the JMM fight and looking average in doing so, and again failing to take out a less talented (albeit great-chinned) Bradley when he had him reeling multiple times probably adds up to Manny not being at a level he would need to be to beat Floyd. Floyd looked fantastic against Cotto, and doesn't appear to have any signs of diminishing skills. I always figured Manny would have a chance just by getting Floyd into exchanges and potentially catching him clean, and then we'd find out what Floyd has when and if he had to get into survival mode. After the Cotto fight, I think Floyd has shown he can handle himself just fine in those circumstances. Whether he'd put himself in that position against a fighter with better power than Cotto (I don't think Floyd truly thought Cotto could hurt him) is an open question, but I think he'd handle Manny. I wish we could have seen it 2-3 years ago. Honestly, even thought I'm not a fan of the public persona of Floyd, I think Manny probably would have brought out the best in him at that point and we would have gotten a fight for the ages, and probably one where everyone left respecting Floyd more than they ever will without that fight as part of his record.

    The decision on Saturday didn't take much away from the fight for me, it was my first time in the arena for a big-time fight like that and I soaked in every second of it. However, the decision did show me that Arum is still Arum and it's unfortunate the influence he still has in the sport. There's little question in my mind that he engineered this, and his indignant act afterwards was a joke. He really has done a disservice to the sport by not putting these two guys together. It could have been a new generation's Leonard-Hearns-Hagler-Duran, the type of series of fights that creates lifetime fans.

    Cap

  • Pylon St8ofmind said...

    To his fault though he looked bad/lazy at times because he also coasted for huge parts of rounds, and was missing wildly a lot when he did miss.

    Manny proved that he was distracted and lacked conditioning...I think this will serve as a huge wake up call for him. Over the last few fights, he has been criticized for his lack of concentration and focus in training camp.

    He's only 33, so he has a few more good years left in him. I think he comes back and just dominates the sport for his remaining fights.

    tVargMan Prime

  • Cap said...

    I was at the fight, and therefore not swayed by announcers (although I suppose you could argue I was swayed by 10,000 loud Filipinos, even though the folks near me were mostly cheering for Bradley). I do respect that Bradley kept coming into the late rounds, and I was disappointed that Manny was unable to take him out when I thought he should have. That being said, I thought Manny won the fight going away. I guess you could say that there were that many close rounds, but only if you're rewarding less effective work. With loose criteria for what makes a "close round", you could argue that there were that many close rounds in the Mayweather-Cotto fight, too, but I think the judges were right on with that one and the scorecards accurately reflected Floyd's advantage. I'd say this fight was similar...Bradley kept coming, much like Cotto, and Pacquiao came away with the better of the exchanges on most occasions, even in the later rounds. Here's where I'm at with the bigger picture: Although I'm a Manny fan, I've come around to the line of thinking that Arum is at fault for the fact that the 2 best fighters in a generation, who fight at the same weight, appear that they will never meet (and if they do, it will be way past the point at which it would have been most competitive). At this point, I don't think Manny beats Floyd anyhow. Given Manny's last 3 fights: not being able to take out Shane despite dominating him, probably losing the JMM fight and looking average in doing so, and again failing to take out a less talented (albeit great-chinned) Bradley when he had him reeling multiple times probably adds up to Manny not being at a level he would need to be to beat Floyd. Floyd looked fantastic against Cotto, and doesn't appear to have any signs of diminishing skills. I always figured Manny would have a chance just by getting Floyd into exchanges and potentially catching him clean, and then we'd find out what Floyd has when and if he had to get into survival mode. After the Cotto fight, I think Floyd has shown he can handle himself just fine in those circumstances. Whether he'd put himself in that position against a fighter with better power than Cotto (I don't think Floyd truly thought Cotto could hurt him) is an open question, but I think he'd handle Manny. I wish we could have seen it 2-3 years ago. Honestly, even thought I'm not a fan of the public persona of Floyd, I think Manny probably would have brought out the best in him at that point and we would have gotten a fight for the ages, and probably one where everyone left respecting Floyd more than they ever will without that fight as part of his record.

    The decision on Saturday didn't take much away from the fight for me, it was my first time in the arena for a big-time fight like that and I soaked in every second of it. However, the decision did show me that Arum is still Arum and it's unfortunate the influence he still has in the sport. There's little question in my mind that he engineered this, and his indignant act afterwards was a joke. He really has done a disservice to the sport by not putting these two guys together. It could have been a new generation's Leonard-Hearns-Hagler-Duran, the type of series of fights that creates lifetime fans.

    I'm a big fan of Floyd (and Manny, though that's apparently not allowed) and I thought he looked really diminished offensively vs Cotto. He missed A LOT more than he usually does, didn't pull the trigger at times he always would in the past and actually seemed to not notice the couple of times in the earlier rounds where he buckled Cotto.

    Sounds like Floyd's R hand was pretty screwed up going into the Cotto fight and I guess that should be noted.

    That being said, I think Floyd's ability to adjust, length, and handspeed would carry the day against Manny.

    Both guys really appear to be in OBVIOUS decline over their last two fights to me.

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind

  • Cap said...

    I was at the fight, and therefore not swayed by announcers (although I suppose you could argue I was swayed by 10,000 loud Filipinos, even though the folks near me were mostly cheering for Bradley).
    I do respect that Bradley kept coming into the late rounds, and I was disappointed that Manny was unable to take him out when I thought he should have. That being said, I thought Manny won the fight going away.
    I guess you could say that there were that many close rounds, but only if you're rewarding less effective work. With loose criteria for what makes a "close round", you could argue that there were that many close rounds in the Mayweather-Cotto fight, too, but I think the judges were right on with that one and the scorecards accurately reflected Floyd's advantage. I'd say this fight was similar...Bradley kept coming, much like Cotto, and Pacquiao came away with the better of the exchanges on most occasions, even in the later rounds.
    Here's where I'm at with the bigger picture:
    Although I'm a Manny fan, I've come around to the line of thinking that Arum is at fault for the fact that the 2 best fighters in a generation, who fight at the same weight, appear that they will never meet (and if they do, it will be way past the point at which it would have been most competitive). At this point, I don't think Manny beats Floyd anyhow. Given Manny's last 3 fights: not being able to take out Shane despite dominating him, probably losing the JMM fight and looking average in doing so, and again failing to take out a less talented (albeit great-chinned) Bradley when he had him reeling multiple times probably adds up to Manny not being at a level he would need to be to beat Floyd. Floyd looked fantastic against Cotto, and doesn't appear to have any signs of diminishing skills. I always figured Manny would have a chance just by getting Floyd into exchanges and potentially catching him clean, and then we'd find out what Floyd has when and if he had to get into survival mode. After the Cotto fight, I think Floyd has shown he can handle himself just fine in those circumstances. Whether he'd put himself in that position against a fighter with better power than Cotto (I don't think Floyd truly thought Cotto could hurt him) is an open question, but I think he'd handle Manny. I wish we could have seen it 2-3 years ago. Honestly, even thought I'm not a fan of the public persona of Floyd, I think Manny probably would have brought out the best in him at that point and we would have gotten a fight for the ages, and probably one where everyone left respecting Floyd more than they ever will without that fight as part of his record.

    The decision on Saturday didn't take much away from the fight for me, it was my first time in the arena for a big-time fight like that and I soaked in every second of it. However, the decision did show me that Arum is still Arum and it's unfortunate the influence he still has in the sport. There's little question in my mind that he engineered this, and his indignant act afterwards was a joke. He really has done a disservice to the sport by not putting these two guys together. It could have been a new generation's Leonard-Hearns-Hagler-Duran, the type of series of fights that creates lifetime fans.

    Great post. I refuse to pay to watch any of these matches until they finally face off, but at this point I think it's too late anyway. Both are great fighters, but their primes were 2-3 years ago.

    I know it's naive, but some small part of me hopes Saturdays obvious fix will prompt Congress or some other body to investigate boxing like they did baseball and finally bring about a complete overhaul of the system. They'll never do it on their own because it's set up for everyone inthe food chain to get paid, but they get paid at the expense of the fans. Again, the reason I won't help line their pockets.

    Fletch

  • By the way, can someone explain the prevailing theory as to why Arum doesn't want the fight to happen and why he would fix a loss on Saturday? Obviously if Manny loses to Floyd he would still rake a huge payday and at least one more with a rematch. Does he just think he can make more matching up Manny with his own fighters?

    Fletch

  • Fletch said...

    Great post. I refuse to pay to watch any of these matches until they finally face off, but at this point I think it's too late anyway. Both are great fighters, but their primes were 2-3 years ago.

    I know it's naive, but some small part of me hopes Saturdays obvious fix will prompt Congress or some other body to investigate boxing like they did baseball and finally bring about a complete overhaul of the system. They'll never do it on their own because it's set up for everyone inthe food chain to get paid, but they get paid at the expense of the fans. Again, the reason I won't help line their pockets.

    John McCain has tried REPEATEDLY in the past. Hard to get a whole lot more powerful American Politician than that.

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind

  • Fletch said...

    By the way, can someone explain the prevailing theory as to why Arum doesn't want the fight to happen and why he would fix a loss on Saturday? Obviously if Manny loses to Floyd he would still rake a huge payday and at least one more with a rematch. Does he just think he can make more matching up Manny with his own fighters?

    Talk was that Manny was going to leave Top Rank (Bob Arum), and now because of the rematch clause he essentially has to stay.

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind