-
Spartanram said...
Ah - high school is a different animal because you have to stop the clock with the time keeper and it counts down to 0.
I remember having to circumvent a high school rule where the keeper got hurt and his coach came on the field. The stupid rules said if a player is tended to he has to come off the field. Thing is, the keeper was fine after he got tended to. Do I make him come out and make them switch keepers, just seemed stupid. I had to a drop ball in this case, I kicked the defender out and made the player on offense kick the ball out of bounds for a throw-in, creating a stoppage. Goalie came back in. Defending team kicked the ball to midfield to the other team. Everyone was happy. Common sense won.
-
Turtleneck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
11891 votes total - (7147)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
boozhoo said...
which goal were they off sides on? no one mentioned that during the match.
The delay call on the goalie was atrocious. i've NEVER seen that called. there was no warning given, and the whistle blew as she was kicking the ball - so it's not like she was just standing there. I don't have a problem with the handball - it was pretty clear. but the indirect kick that preceded it should never have been given.
-
Cosmo_Kramer
- 5 stars Rating: 81
8529 votes total - The Assman
- (11694)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
chuckles396 said...
" During the second half, with the U.S. frantically trying to speed the game up while attempting multiple comebacks, Wambach began running near referee Christiana Pedersen and counting off the seconds that McLeod held the ball. She said she often got to 10 and into even the teens.
"I wasn't yelling. I was just counting," Wambach revealed on Wednesday during an interview at the team hotel here. "Probably did it five to seven times."
The last time came in the 78th minute, with Canada trying to milk a 3-2 lead. McLeod made a save and Wambach began counting again.
"I got to 10 seconds right next to the referee and at 10 seconds she blew the whistle," Wambach said. "
SpartanInNH ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8427 votes total - 53 miles west of Venus
- (12323)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanInNH ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8427 votes total - 53 miles west of Venus
- (12323)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Spartanram said...
I've refereed soccer in the past for about ten years and know some pretty high up soccer referees in the state and a few out of state. Consensus seems to be, and I would agree, the 6 second call on the goalie is complete bullshit. From my training, I remember them basically saying you never make that call, but are more or less able to threaten the goalie with it. The punishment does not fit the crime. The goalie should be instructed multiple times to release the ball. One reason is the referee has an easy mechanism, add time.
The PK the majority seem to agree was fine. The issue than being, the indirect free kick that preceded the deliberate hand ball should have never been called.
I was at work so I was not able to watch the game, so I can't really speak to overall how the referee did.
Beardy ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4564 votes total - In the hall of the Mountain King
- (7314)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
DilMeister269
- 5 stars Rating: 91
1839 votes total - (839)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jwarsenal9 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
2617 votes total - (2946)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Vim said...
It was Canada's second goal ... I was complaining about it live and thought it was strange that the commentators didn't mention anything. Noticed a few people bring it up on Twitter.
Here's a screencap. Notice the blonde chick for Canada.
http://i.imgur.com/VQSb3.jpg
jwarsenal9 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
2617 votes total - (2946)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Vim said...
It was Canada's second goal ... I was complaining about it live and thought it was strange that the commentators didn't mention anything. Noticed a few people bring it up on Twitter.
Here's a screencap. Notice the blonde chick for Canada.
http://i.imgur.com/VQSb3.jpg
SpartanInNH ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8427 votes total - 53 miles west of Venus
- (12323)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Spartanram said...
I didn't watch the game. I based my observations on the opinions of some higher level referees (National Level, Grade 3's and 4's) and some college officials (Big Ten and other smaller schools) that I was reading on Facebook as well as my own experiences. I watched a replay of the call and was stunned. Especially because as was stated earlier, the goalie was in the process of releasing the ball. An indirect free kick in the penalty area is a harsh punishment in soccer for something like this.
I agree a couple minutes may be excessive, but I would still prefer it to be honest. Really, I would probably threaten to add the time second for second but wouldn't. Some time-wasting is going to happen.
The handling call was definitely more gray, some seem to agree others do not.
Beardy ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
4564 votes total - In the hall of the Mountain King
- (7314)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
El Doctor B
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1031 votes total - (1021)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
WBill@ said...
http://www.thestar.com/sports/london2012/football/article/1237877--london-2012-canada-loses-4-3-to-us-in-olympic-soccer-semifinal
"London 2012: Canadian women robbed in soccer semi: Kelly"
"Monday’s Olympic semifinal at Old Trafford was probably the best game of women’s football ever played. Canada lost 4-3 after added extra time. The key player? Norwegian referee Christina Pedersen."
"No one cares what you know, until they know how much you care." Mark Dantonio
GTASpartan87
- 4 stars Rating: 80
3014 votes total - Jeremiah Johnson
- (3934)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Beardy said...
It's a rule in the referee's toolbox. Just because it isn't often (ever) used, doesn't mean it can't be used if the goalie is obviously just going to ignore you in a situation where escalating to a card won't do any good either. It's basically a nuclear option, though.
What was the rest of the game like? Was it a bit chippy where having one player ignore the ref might make you have to give out cards in other situations to keep control?
I certainly agree that it was late to call it in that instance, but without watching the game, and probably without being the referee, it's impossible to know what led up to making that call.
-
mentalstate
- 5 stars Rating: 86
8650 votes total - (7703)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6


Ahhh, those sneaky Americans, playing mind games -- referring to the RULES!!!!
Canada thinks they were robbed or We Got Hosed, eh