Online Now 2683

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1994
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2691
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Delany's New Power Hungry Goal - Ability to Fire Coaches

  • joerco said...

    Sources tell me he's also looking to impose Prima Nocta if any B1G players get married while in school.

    ...or coaches. Isn't Brett Bielema marrying a vegas stripper or something?

    PunjabiExpress

  • Not Delany, THE BOARD! Quit spreading propaganda.

    signature image

    Spartan8Ball

  • Spartan8Ball said...

    Not Delany, THE BOARD! Quit spreading propaganda.

    It's really none of your business.

    "Losing Benenoch is a mortal blow from which this program can't recover"-T-Pain

    Rogue Leader

  • Rogue Leader said...

    It's really none of your business.

    Like it's any of yours! lol

    signature image

    Spartan8Ball

  • Wait.

    This is serious?

    lol

    Report -- Big Ten may give commissioner Jim Delany power to fire coaches, athletics officials - ESPN

    The Big Ten is considering a plan to give commissioner Jim Delany the power to fire coaches in the wake of the Penn State child sex-abuse scandal, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported.

    espn.go.com

    NigelUno

  • NORTH AUGUSTA, S.C. -- The Nike Peach Jam is among the summer's best basketball events because it features four games running simultaneously at the same location from 9 in the morning till 11 at night, almost nonstop. College coaches get here early and stay late. And they don't do much reading while inside the Riverview Park Activities Center. So a lot of them are just now hearing about a proposal that, if adopted, would give Big Ten president Jim Delany the power to terminate Big Ten coaches for actions that "significantly harm the league's reputation."

    "What?" asked one Big Ten coach when I asked if he'd heard the proposal. He subsequently told me he had not. So I explained it. Then he responded.

    "Are you f-cking kidding me?" he said.

    And that was basically the consensus response.

    I spoke with five Big Ten coaches -- both Big Ten head coaches and Big Ten assistants -- about the proposal this afternoon, and none of them thought it made much sense. They didn't want to comment on the record because, you know, it's unwise to publicly mock your league. But they let loose when granted anonymity.

    "Penn State had an awful scandal because it had one man [Joe Paterno] who had too much power. Is that right?" one coach asked. "So the way to fix that is to give another man [Delany] too much power? Does that make any sense? It takes some kind of arrogance to even suggest that."

    Another coach echoed those thoughts.

    "The head coaches should fire the assistant coaches, the athletic directors should fire the head coaches, the presidents should fire the athletic directors, and the boards should fire the presidents," he said. "It's like Bill Belichick's saying -- 'Do your job.' That's the way it should be. We don't need a commissioner trying to do somebody else's job -- especially when a commissioner firing one school's great coach could help make things easier for that school's rival. The whole thing is stupid. How do people even come up with this sh-t?"

    signature image signature image

    L.G.R.W.

    beal99

  • This post was edited by rodent on 7/19/2012 at 9:22 PM

    rodent

  • beal99 said...
    "Are you f-cking kidding me?" he said.

    "Penn State had an awful scandal because it had one man [Joe Paterno] who had too much power. Is that right?" one coach asked. "So the way to fix that is to give another man [Delany] too much power? Does that make any sense? It takes some kind of arrogance to even suggest that."

    This about nails it...

    Cleavage2

  • One more time, for anyone who seems to be missing the important details or just plain didn't read the article:

    The proposal, part of a plan being circulated among Big Ten leaders, would give James E. Delany, who has overseen the league since 1989, and a powerful committee of conference presidents the ability to penalize individual members of an institution, should their actions significantly harm the league’s reputation.

    I'm not saying it's a good idea, and I'm not supporting Jim Delaney, but let's get the facts straight.

    This post was edited by Omar Comin19758 on 7/19/2012 at 3:55 PM

    signature image

    Omar Comin19758

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Somewhere in a PSU thread I warned you all the NCAA and major conference commissioners wouldn't let this Paterno case go to waste if they saw a clear path to more power.

    GRR, thanks for the warning. I don't even want to think of what could have happened if you didn't warn us of this situation in some PSU thread.

    SpartanElement

  • Omar Comin' said...

    One more time, for anyone who seems to be missing the important details or just plain didn't read the article:

    The proposal, part of a plan being circulated among Big Ten leaders, would give James E. Delany, who has overseen the league since 1989, and a powerful committee of conference presidents the ability to penalize individual members of an institution, should their actions significantly harm the league’s reputation.

    It's obvious that the B1G is playing a chess game to minimize the fallout from the PSU situation. Essentially they are closing the barn door after the horse has been stolen.

    This snowball is rolling down the hill and they are trying to get everyone out of the way, attempting to protect the "brand" of the B1G. It's simply the wrong solution. I'm sure the conference presidents could force a member institution to do any number of punitive measures. That isn't going to resolve this.

    The longer this goes on the more the death penalty seems likely. What a cluster f---.

    Cleavage2

  • Omar Comin' said...

    One more time, for anyone who seems to be missing the important details or just plain didn't read the article:

    The proposal, part of a plan being circulated among Big Ten leaders, would give James E. Delany, who has overseen the league since 1989, and a powerful committee of conference presidents the ability to penalize individual members of an institution, should their actions significantly harm the league’s reputation.

    I'm not saying it's a good idea, and I'm not supporting Jim Delaney, but let's get the facts straight.

    It's much more fun to run with the whole Delaney power grab angle. However, even if it were a committee of presidents, it still smacks of too much central control of autonomous institutions.

    signature image

    I think of a hero as someone who understands the degree of responsibility that comes with his freedom. -Bob Dylan

    Geoff71

  • Who would be on this small influential president committe? Mary Sue, Gordon Gee and Delany?

    Io Triumphe

  • Spartan8Ball said...

    Like it's any of yours! lol

    Spartan > not a spartan.

    "Losing Benenoch is a mortal blow from which this program can't recover"-T-Pain

    Rogue Leader

  • Lunchables

  • Omar Comin' said...

    One more time, for anyone who seems to be missing the important details or just plain didn't read the article:

    The proposal, part of a plan being circulated among Big Ten leaders, would give James E. Delany, who has overseen the league since 1989, and a powerful committee of conference presidents the ability to penalize individual members of an institution, should their actions significantly harm the league’s reputation.

    I'm not saying it's a good idea, and I'm not supporting Jim Delaney, but let's get the facts straight.

    Depends how the members of that committee are appointed.

    MiamiSpartan

  • MiamiSpartan said...

    Depends how the members of that committee are appointed.

    What makes you think that the committee wouldn't include all conference presidents.

    People try way to hard to hate Delany. A few days ago there was a thread about how he and Larry Scott got ESPN to pony up $80MM/year for the Rose Bowl broadcast rights, and it got just a few responses. Then you have this article (which is completely misrepresented by the OP) and people decide not to read it, and just run with whatever speculation pops up in the thread as gospel.

    Rodeo Burger

  • Didn't read the whole thread, so this may have been mentioned, but isn't there a huge problem for 11 of the 12 coaches (all but Northwestern) since they are public employees and, therefore, have certain due process rights that don't involve what a private corporation (the Big Ten) wants?

    SpartanBoiler

  • beal99 said...

    NORTH AUGUSTA, S.C. -- The Nike Peach Jam is among the summer's best basketball events because it features four games running simultaneously at the same location from 9 in the morning till 11 at night, almost nonstop. College coaches get here early and stay late. And they don't do much reading while inside the Riverview Park Activities Center. So a lot of them are just now hearing about a proposal that, if adopted, would give Big Ten president Jim Delany the power to terminate Big Ten coaches for actions that "significantly harm the league's reputation."

    "What?" asked one Big Ten coach when I asked if he'd heard the proposal. He subsequently told me he had not. So I explained it. Then he responded.

    "Are you f-cking kidding me?" he said.

    And that was basically the consensus response.

    I spoke with five Big Ten coaches -- both Big Ten head coaches and Big Ten assistants -- about the proposal this afternoon, and none of them thought it made much sense. They didn't want to comment on the record because, you know, it's unwise to publicly mock your league. But they let loose when granted anonymity.

    "Penn State had an awful scandal because it had one man [Joe Paterno] who had too much power. Is that right?" one coach asked. "So the way to fix that is to give another man [Delany] too much power? Does that make any sense? It takes some kind of arrogance to even suggest that."

    Another coach echoed those thoughts.

    "The head coaches should fire the assistant coaches, the athletic directors should fire the head coaches, the presidents should fire the athletic directors, and the boards should fire the presidents," he said. "It's like Bill Belichick's saying -- 'Do your job.' That's the way it should be. We don't need a commissioner trying to do somebody else's job -- especially when a commissioner firing one school's great coach could help make things easier for that school's rival. The whole thing is stupid. How do people even come up with this sh-t?"

    Any one have a feeling that the quoted coach is Izzo? Kinda sounds like something he would say.

    I agree with what this coach says, btw. He's dead nuts on.

    King1

    signature image

    If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in a kingdom of the blind. - Kurt Vonnegut

    One Eyed Jack

  • SpartanBoiler said...

    Didn't read the whole thread, so this may have been mentioned, but isn't there a huge problem for 11 of the 12 coaches (all but Northwestern) since they are public employees and, therefore, have certain due process rights that don't involve what a private corporation (the Big Ten) wants?

    This committee could not fire a coach. It could only recommend to the institution that they fire a coach.

    PRStoetzer

  • PRStoetzer said...

    This committee could not fire a coach. It could only recommend to the institution that they fire a coach.

    I'm still not sure if it would be legal. The committee's recommendation would likely include something like "fire Coach X or you will face a loss of revenue," which could violate that coach's due process rights.

    SpartanBoiler

  • I dont care if there is a committee of presidents as well. Delaney is an ass hat and an embarassment to our league.

    After thinking about this for a while, I wonder if Notre Dame would be a member of the B1G if we were lead by... you know.. an empowering leader instead of this power tripping nut job.

    Sparty2QP

  • This post was edited by rodent on 7/19/2012 at 9:23 PM

    rodent

  • TX Sparty said...

    I've always pictured Delany as some kind of James Bond villan. Or maybe Mr. Burns.

    attachmentattachment
    signature image

    mriderblue12 said... Your a retard.

    Watch Out Pylon

  • No fucking way the individual universities allow this.

    The RCMB...is one of the most awful, alarming, inappropriate, disgusting, and offensive msg boards in the history of the internet.

    Jud Owns Digger