-
SpartanGA ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
1189 votes total - (2134)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
arvin3 said...
Well, you want smart kids for your program. This is not a smart kid. The record on M academics is clearly out there for anyone that is doing the research. M is > greater than Stanford academics. Not a smart kid. That said I'm sure he's smart enough for a big uglie. Dantonio should've been in East Lansing Friday rather than selling Spartan Fund to senile 70 years olds. M rolled out the carpet, everyone was on duty and once the kid left East Lansing Friday it was all over but the committing. MSU needs become more committed to excellence in recruiting and willing to pay the price, everyday, all day. Hoke was on TV Saturday night nearing 11:00pm and he was still humping. When shown on screen he had a soft drink in his hand and a recruit in the next seat hanging on his every word. He had gone from 7:00am, humping every minute. That's why they are great and that's why they kicked our butt all day Saturday. What a haul.
ttimeizku
- 4 stars Rating: 64
834 votes total - Taylor Clark
- (858)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SpartanRocky ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16723 votes total - Andrew Bell
- (22322)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanHoops
- 5 stars Rating: 84
4092 votes total - (6264)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Spartan Scott said...
So true... I'm not worried about the first 2 to 3 classes UM gets. They are a great school with a rich history and Hoke is filling the roster with "his kids". Once he has enough of his kids, are 4 stars really wanting to sit the bench? The only way some of them would be willing to rid pine is if UM starts contending for national championships, and frankly, I don't see that happening.
-
Cosmo_Kramer
- 5 stars Rating: 81
8518 votes total - The Assman
- (11661)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Big John Studd
- 5 stars Rating: 86
3812 votes total - America J Pop Fun Time Now
- (5808)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanHoops
- 5 stars Rating: 84
4092 votes total - (6264)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Nitro Biscuits said...
2 things.
1) Stop measuring MSU by UofM. If they do well it isn't the end of the world for MSU. In fact it could better be argued a stronger Big Ten and more respect for the Big Ten helps MSU ultimately.
2) Coaching still counts. If MSU does more with lesser ranked talent (through a combo of better talent evaluation and better coaching up) and continually gets better and better eventually MSU will build a reputation and base to hang with the programs that are considered elite. It takes time and it's hard. MSU under Dantonio has started that long journey and it's been fun so far.
-
82msuspartan said...
Absolutely agree with you. And also conferences go through up and down periods with the SEC in permanant up status it seems. I think the Big 10 is entering into one of those up periods in football that is going to last for quite a while as the league has gotten much better especially the middle tier. As much as we already hate Urban Meyer he is going to make the whole league better by raising the bar of expectations and recruiting.
WinnipegSpartan
- 3 stars Rating: 53
697 votes total - (486)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
GoBlueFromOhio
- 2 stars Rating: 38
702 votes total - (324)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
WinnipegSpartan
- 3 stars Rating: 53
697 votes total - (486)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
2) Coaching still counts. If MSU does more with lesser ranked talent (through a combo of better talent evaluation and better coaching up) and continually gets better and better eventually MSU will build a reputation and base to hang with the programs that are considered elite. It takes time and it's hard. MSU under Dantonio has started that long journey and it's been fun so far.
This post was edited by detrocks on 2/20/2012 at 3:45 PM
-
detrocks said...
I think that this is a key statement. One of the big things that you've seen at MSU under Dantonio is that kids get better. Under RichRod, you saw a bunch of cases where highly ranked guys either stagnated or washed out completely. UM was filled guys whose best days were in high school. You never see that with Dantonio and his staff-- guys get consistently better. That's why MSU has been by far the better program over the last couple of years even with lower ranked classes.
Obviously, you'd like to get higher ranked guys, but as programs like MSU, Wisconsin, Boise State, TCU, Stanford have shown, it's more important to get guys that you like and that fit your system. You can win big that way and once you do that, the 4 and 5 star guys will come (look at Stanford's last class).
Foster Mathis
- 3 stars Rating: 49
466 votes total - (263)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Foster Mathis said...
Having said that, don't discount Michigan's recruiting success with the "they've always had better rated classes and we've beat them four in a row." We hired Hoke so the RichRod years would'nt happen again, and early returns show that he can develop talent and keep kids in his program, unlike RichRod was able to. Because of this, Michigan will be back to being Michigan - especially if we can keep recruiting like we are.
Will it mean we'll go back to pounding you guys annually? Nope - Dantonio has built a good program and it will be very competitive. But don't expect last year, in which we looked overmatched, to continue.
-
Robbub said...
Sorry, but Michigan has had "great" paper recruiting classes for as long as I remember (back to 93) yet hasn't delivered other than 97. I can't think of a program that has done less with more talent during that timespan. Richrod just happened to be the most (in)effective at it.
As for Hoke - he had a great last year... but then again, so did JLS... he had a pretty good year his first year then collapsed once things got going. I'm not saying that will happen for Hoke - but he's benefited his 1st year by having a solid offensive group of recruits leftover from RR and managing to put together a good defense. As his recruits get into the system, the offense *will* take a hit, the schedule *will* get harder and other teams *will* figure out how to defend/attack his system.
Michigan appears headed down the right path (for them) but its not going to be like it was in the 80's and 90's.
This post was edited by vcmarsh1 on 2/20/2012 at 6:10 PM
-
Foster Mathis said...
I agree and this is key. Recruiting highly rated players does matter - But keeping and developing them is the other part of the equation. Many on these boards shrug off UofM's recruiting momentum and say "they've had better classes the past few years and we still beat them." Yes, this is true - HOWEVER, the RichRod years at Michigan were marred with attrition - Heavy attrition - Which saw highly rated kids leave campus or not make it at all - These players include Tate Forcier, Demar Dorsey, Adrian Witty, Justin Turner, Cullen Christina, Boubacar Cissoko, Carvin Johnson, Austin White, Vlad Emilien, Anthony LaLota, Jeron Stokes, Taylor Smith, Sam McGuffie, Taylor Hill..............the list goes on. These are all Four/Mid to High Three star players.
On paper on signing day, Michigan's classes looked better than MSU's - However when all was said and done, the kids that actually made it to campus or stayed weren't much more highly rated than MSUs.
Add to the fact that Michigan was in a constant state of uncertainty with rotating coordinators and really ineptness of the coaching staff - there was little to no development of talent. Look at Will Campbell - He moved to Offensive Line in RichRod's final year!
The best thing that Dantonio did was weather the "state of uncertainty" that had plagued the MSU program for a long time. This gave him the opportunity to recruit a good staff and good players that developed in his system. Add to the fact that he developed some very high level players out of "meh" rated guys - Jones & Worthy to be precise.
I think Dantonio has done a great job at MSU and will continue to do so because he has built a foundation that will continue to churn out teams that reflect his system. Recruits have already taken notice as it seems that MSU is recruiting better than they historicall have.
Having said that, don't discount Michigan's recruiting success with the "they've always had better rated classes and we've beat them four in a row." We hired Hoke so the RichRod years would'nt happen again, and early returns show that he can develop talent and keep kids in his program, unlike RichRod was able to. Because of this, Michigan will be back to being Michigan - especially if we can keep recruiting like we are.
Will it mean we'll go back to pounding you guys annually? Nope - Dantonio has built a good program and it will be very competitive. But don't expect last year, in which we looked overmatched, to continue.
Anyone. Anyplace. Anytime.
-
CalvinsJohnson8
- 3 stars Rating: 54
3278 votes total - (2482)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5





Details of Bosch commitment to scUM