Online Now 3228

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2822
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 3587
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Details of Bosch commitment to scUM

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Kid is a fool if he thinks that umaa degree trumps one from Stanford

    qft.

    apparently he needs academics.

    SpartanGA

  • arvin3 said...

    Well, you want smart kids for your program. This is not a smart kid. The record on M academics is clearly out there for anyone that is doing the research. M is > greater than Stanford academics. Not a smart kid. That said I'm sure he's smart enough for a big uglie. Dantonio should've been in East Lansing Friday rather than selling Spartan Fund to senile 70 years olds. M rolled out the carpet, everyone was on duty and once the kid left East Lansing Friday it was all over but the committing. MSU needs become more committed to excellence in recruiting and willing to pay the price, everyday, all day. Hoke was on TV Saturday night nearing 11:00pm and he was still humping. When shown on screen he had a soft drink in his hand and a recruit in the next seat hanging on his every word. He had gone from 7:00am, humping every minute. That's why they are great and that's why they kicked our butt all day Saturday. What a haul.

    Tanfan?

    ttimeizku

  • TheDudeAbides21 said...

    Exactly... you guys will get your guys none of the guys we got really effects you. Too much talent in the midwest not too.

    Stop being rational. It makes it harder for tRCMB to hate on you lol

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Royal said...

    it's held in high regard, but no one out here thinks UM is better than Stanford.

    UM also graduates a lot more people than Stanford. Nothing against UM it is a great school but in general a Stanford degree is more prestigous. Dantonio will pull in the talent to compete and win. it's not like the five star recruits have been piling up the last few years, this staff just finds players who can play at a high level.

    This post was edited by on 2/20/2012 at 1:43 PM

    Gene Parmesan

  • Foster Mathis said...

    This.

    The Ivy League is in a class of its own, IMO, when it comes to academics and reputation. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool.

    There are a ton of Big Ten undergrads that go to Ivy League schools for grad school, my wife included. I agree it's the greatest collection of universities in the world, but they wouldn't take so many Big Ten grads if they didn't think they were prepared. In this instance I think their reputation exceeds academics to a certain degree.

    This post was edited by Cthulhu on 2/20/2012 at 1:47 PM

    Cthulhu

  • Royal said...

    it's held in high regard, but no one out here thinks UM is better than Stanford.

    Lane Kiffin hates the Stanford coach. Dood is stealing recruits that he should get easily with the academic sell and doesn't hurt when you get to meet Condoleezza Rice. I think that was one of the sellers for Barry Sanders Jr. when he got to meet Condie.

    This post was edited by SpartanHoops on 2/20/2012 at 1:49 PM

    SpartanHoops

  • Irrelevant - somewhat... but remember, we're competing over recruits so its a worthy discussion. A program like Michigan's isn't staying down forever... the difference is what happens in *our* program. We're not going to suffer though the problems that gave Michigan a leg up in the 80's and 90's. With limitations in scholarships for all schools and us not being on probation, I expect a more level playing field. I also think having a Big-10 Championship game at the end of the season is going to work against them long term.

    As for the recruiting, Its part of their strategy to go after sophomores and juniors heavily. They push for the early committment and then have time to focus again on next year's sophomores and juniors. They focus heavily on just a few select seniors.

    Contrast that with our (and most other) programs where we are studying film and recruiting most of our class as seniors and simply meeting/greeting the juniors. MD is going to have to adjust his strategy somewhat to meet Michigan's tactics but still will keep his plan as a whole.

    If you looked at the rest of the Big-10, we're off to actually a better start than past years. We're in the top 3 currently (Michigan has 11 four-stars, Ohio State has 4 four-stars or better, MSU has 1 four-star with potentially a second (rivals has no rank for our second), Nebraska has 1 four-star... Wisconsin has 1 recruit period... the other SEVEN Big-10 teams don't have any recruits).

    Hoke's strategy... its both GOOD and BAD for us.. it'll mean that some of the guys we want are going to be already gone or heavily in bed with the weasels. Others though, will still be blossoming and our recruiting may be more accurate against talent at positions where Michigan is full.

    This is basically something I noticed PSU doing about 5-10 years ago. It *kinda* worked for them but they missed out on a bunch of good guys late because they were full so they backed off on it. They also got some guys who had peaked as Juniors and didn't really pan out as Seniors...

    Robbub

  • Spartan Scott said...

    So true... I'm not worried about the first 2 to 3 classes UM gets. They are a great school with a rich history and Hoke is filling the roster with "his kids". Once he has enough of his kids, are 4 stars really wanting to sit the bench? The only way some of them would be willing to rid pine is if UM starts contending for national championships, and frankly, I don't see that happening.

    Its inevitible if they keep landing top 5 classes. Tressel, Carrol, Meyer, Saban, Miles, Brown. The common theme for these successful coaches has been top 5 classes pretty consistently. scUM is looking like they are on their way to their second straight top 5ish type class. Won't make too much difference in 2012 but 2014, 15 and 16 look out. Recruiting is always about 2 or 3 years down the road.

    82msuspartan

  • PortlandSpartan said...

    Sounds to me like he basically flipped a coin. Recruiting is such a crapshoot.

    That is why it is overrated.

    What is that, a Titleist? A hole in one...

    Cosmo_Kramer

  • WinnipegSpartan said...

    Well, people were saying that last year also, and I believe they only had one person flip. For whatever reason, they must have these kids pretty enamored beforehand.

    Agreed. Please let me know when one of these UM recruits actually leaves. Is this some sort of last resort we hang our hats on to make us feel better?

    As much as we hate it there are some kids who go to UM because they actually have wings on their helmets.

    Big John Studd

  • Cosmo_Kramer said...

    That is why it is overrated.

    we need more big will recruits

    SpartanHoops

  • Nitro Biscuits said...

    2 things.

    1) Stop measuring MSU by UofM. If they do well it isn't the end of the world for MSU. In fact it could better be argued a stronger Big Ten and more respect for the Big Ten helps MSU ultimately.

    2) Coaching still counts. If MSU does more with lesser ranked talent (through a combo of better talent evaluation and better coaching up) and continually gets better and better eventually MSU will build a reputation and base to hang with the programs that are considered elite. It takes time and it's hard. MSU under Dantonio has started that long journey and it's been fun so far.

    Absolutely agree with you. And also conferences go through up and down periods with the SEC in permanant up status it seems. I think the Big 10 is entering into one of those up periods in football that is going to last for quite a while as the league has gotten much better especially the middle tier. As much as we already hate Urban Meyer he is going to make the whole league better by raising the bar of expectations and recruiting.

    82msuspartan

  • 82msuspartan said...

    Absolutely agree with you. And also conferences go through up and down periods with the SEC in permanant up status it seems. I think the Big 10 is entering into one of those up periods in football that is going to last for quite a while as the league has gotten much better especially the middle tier. As much as we already hate Urban Meyer he is going to make the whole league better by raising the bar of expectations and recruiting.

    The SEC on the whole is actually beginning its "down cycle" right now. They will be on top for another 4-6 years, at which time the B10 will supplant them.

    WinnipegSpartan

  • SpartanHoops said...

    we need more big will recruits

    Kids like him don't come around that often.

    GoBlueFromOhio

  • SpartanHoops said...

    we need more big will recruits

    From all the video I've watched, the next "Big Will" caliber in-state recruit is Malik McDowell from the 2014 class. This is a case where it would be nice to have Enos on board.

    WinnipegSpartan

  • 2) Coaching still counts. If MSU does more with lesser ranked talent (through a combo of better talent evaluation and better coaching up) and continually gets better and better eventually MSU will build a reputation and base to hang with the programs that are considered elite. It takes time and it's hard. MSU under Dantonio has started that long journey and it's been fun so far.

    I think that this is a key statement. One of the big things that you've seen at MSU under Dantonio is that kids get better. Under RichRod, you saw a bunch of cases where highly ranked guys either stagnated or washed out completely. UM was filled guys whose best days were in high school. You never see that with Dantonio and his staff-- guys get consistently better. That's why MSU has been by far the better program over the last couple of years even with lower ranked classes.

    Obviously, you'd like to get higher ranked guys, but as programs like MSU, Wisconsin, Boise State, TCU, Stanford have shown, it's more important to get guys that you like and that fit your system. You can win big that way and once you do that, the 4 and 5 star guys will come (look at Stanford's last class).

    This post was edited by detrocks on 2/20/2012 at 3:45 PM

    detrocks

  • Stanford's haul was just bizarre. The lack of offers form USC has to play a role in that, because that school has never recruited that well even when they had great success in the past.

    FilthySanchez

  • You can win big doing that, but can you win consistently? TCU looks headed for mediocrity after a nice run. Wisconsin is up and down. BSU, well, see their conference. It's pretty hard to deny that to win at the highest level consistently you have to recruit stellar athletes.

    FilthySanchez

  • detrocks said...

    I think that this is a key statement. One of the big things that you've seen at MSU under Dantonio is that kids get better. Under RichRod, you saw a bunch of cases where highly ranked guys either stagnated or washed out completely. UM was filled guys whose best days were in high school. You never see that with Dantonio and his staff-- guys get consistently better. That's why MSU has been by far the better program over the last couple of years even with lower ranked classes.

    Obviously, you'd like to get higher ranked guys, but as programs like MSU, Wisconsin, Boise State, TCU, Stanford have shown, it's more important to get guys that you like and that fit your system. You can win big that way and once you do that, the 4 and 5 star guys will come (look at Stanford's last class).

    I agree and this is key. Recruiting highly rated players does matter - But keeping and developing them is the other part of the equation. Many on these boards shrug off UofM's recruiting momentum and say "they've had better classes the past few years and we still beat them." Yes, this is true - HOWEVER, the RichRod years at Michigan were marred with attrition - Heavy attrition - Which saw highly rated kids leave campus or not make it at all - These players include Tate Forcier, Demar Dorsey, Adrian Witty, Justin Turner, Cullen Christina, Boubacar Cissoko, Carvin Johnson, Austin White, Vlad Emilien, Anthony LaLota, Jeron Stokes, Taylor Smith, Sam McGuffie, Taylor Hill..............the list goes on. These are all Four/Mid to High Three star players.

    On paper on signing day, Michigan's classes looked better than MSU's - However when all was said and done, the kids that actually made it to campus or stayed weren't much more highly rated than MSUs.

    Add to the fact that Michigan was in a constant state of uncertainty with rotating coordinators and really ineptness of the coaching staff - there was little to no development of talent. Look at Will Campbell - He moved to Offensive Line in RichRod's final year!

    The best thing that Dantonio did was weather the "state of uncertainty" that had plagued the MSU program for a long time. This gave him the opportunity to recruit a good staff and good players that developed in his system. Add to the fact that he developed some very high level players out of "meh" rated guys - Jones & Worthy to be precise.

    I think Dantonio has done a great job at MSU and will continue to do so because he has built a foundation that will continue to churn out teams that reflect his system. Recruits have already taken notice as it seems that MSU is recruiting better than they historicall have.

    Having said that, don't discount Michigan's recruiting success with the "they've always had better rated classes and we've beat them four in a row." We hired Hoke so the RichRod years would'nt happen again, and early returns show that he can develop talent and keep kids in his program, unlike RichRod was able to. Because of this, Michigan will be back to being Michigan - especially if we can keep recruiting like we are.

    Will it mean we'll go back to pounding you guys annually? Nope - Dantonio has built a good program and it will be very competitive. But don't expect last year, in which we looked overmatched, to continue.

    Foster Mathis

  • Foster Mathis said...

    Having said that, don't discount Michigan's recruiting success with the "they've always had better rated classes and we've beat them four in a row." We hired Hoke so the RichRod years would'nt happen again, and early returns show that he can develop talent and keep kids in his program, unlike RichRod was able to. Because of this, Michigan will be back to being Michigan - especially if we can keep recruiting like we are.

    Will it mean we'll go back to pounding you guys annually? Nope - Dantonio has built a good program and it will be very competitive. But don't expect last year, in which we looked overmatched, to continue.

    Sorry, but Michigan has had "great" paper recruiting classes for as long as I remember (back to 93) yet hasn't delivered other than 97. I can't think of a program that has done less with more talent during that timespan. Richrod just happened to be the most (in)effective at it.

    As for Hoke - he had a great last year... but then again, so did JLS... he had a pretty good year his first year then collapsed once things got going. I'm not saying that will happen for Hoke - but he's benefited his 1st year by having a solid offensive group of recruits leftover from RR and managing to put together a good defense. As his recruits get into the system, the offense *will* take a hit, the schedule *will* get harder and other teams *will* figure out how to defend/attack his system.

    Michigan appears headed down the right path (for them) but its not going to be like it was in the 80's and 90's.

    Robbub

  • Robbub said...

    Sorry, but Michigan has had "great" paper recruiting classes for as long as I remember (back to 93) yet hasn't delivered other than 97. I can't think of a program that has done less with more talent during that timespan. Richrod just happened to be the most (in)effective at it.

    As for Hoke - he had a great last year... but then again, so did JLS... he had a pretty good year his first year then collapsed once things got going. I'm not saying that will happen for Hoke - but he's benefited his 1st year by having a solid offensive group of recruits leftover from RR and managing to put together a good defense. As his recruits get into the system, the offense *will* take a hit, the schedule *will* get harder and other teams *will* figure out how to defend/attack his system.

    Michigan appears headed down the right path (for them) but its not going to be like it was in the 80's and 90's.

    Not sure what you expect them to deliver...From 97-2007, they won or shared 5 Big Ten championships, and in 2006 absolutely destroyed the entire Big Ten until the ohio state game. Not exactly how that's "doing less with more." It's not like they were bringing in the #1 class every year and not winning national championships. The Rich Rod era speaks for itself, which you acknowledged.

    Last season could have been a flash in the pan, but I don't expect it. Something to be said for continuity with the coaching staff and system (especially on D). msu has become successful and will continue to be successful because the system is not changing. Guys come in during the summer and upperclassmen are able to teach them the system, rather than having to wait until fall to learn a new one (like Michigan during the RR years and msu with JLS).

    This post was edited by vcmarsh1 on 2/20/2012 at 6:10 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    vcmarsh1

  • Foster Mathis said...

    I agree and this is key. Recruiting highly rated players does matter - But keeping and developing them is the other part of the equation. Many on these boards shrug off UofM's recruiting momentum and say "they've had better classes the past few years and we still beat them." Yes, this is true - HOWEVER, the RichRod years at Michigan were marred with attrition - Heavy attrition - Which saw highly rated kids leave campus or not make it at all - These players include Tate Forcier, Demar Dorsey, Adrian Witty, Justin Turner, Cullen Christina, Boubacar Cissoko, Carvin Johnson, Austin White, Vlad Emilien, Anthony LaLota, Jeron Stokes, Taylor Smith, Sam McGuffie, Taylor Hill..............the list goes on. These are all Four/Mid to High Three star players.

    On paper on signing day, Michigan's classes looked better than MSU's - However when all was said and done, the kids that actually made it to campus or stayed weren't much more highly rated than MSUs.

    Add to the fact that Michigan was in a constant state of uncertainty with rotating coordinators and really ineptness of the coaching staff - there was little to no development of talent. Look at Will Campbell - He moved to Offensive Line in RichRod's final year!

    The best thing that Dantonio did was weather the "state of uncertainty" that had plagued the MSU program for a long time. This gave him the opportunity to recruit a good staff and good players that developed in his system. Add to the fact that he developed some very high level players out of "meh" rated guys - Jones & Worthy to be precise.

    I think Dantonio has done a great job at MSU and will continue to do so because he has built a foundation that will continue to churn out teams that reflect his system. Recruits have already taken notice as it seems that MSU is recruiting better than they historicall have.

    Having said that, don't discount Michigan's recruiting success with the "they've always had better rated classes and we've beat them four in a row." We hired Hoke so the RichRod years would'nt happen again, and early returns show that he can develop talent and keep kids in his program, unlike RichRod was able to. Because of this, Michigan will be back to being Michigan - especially if we can keep recruiting like we are.

    Will it mean we'll go back to pounding you guys annually? Nope - Dantonio has built a good program and it will be very competitive. But don't expect last year, in which we looked overmatched, to continue.

    I agree with a lot of this, and appreciate the tone of a UM grad who speaks with reason and courtesy. Bravo.

    My only comment is that I do find it funny how many UM folks (not the poster I'm responding to) constantly bash Rodriguez, while at the same time failing to recognize the reason their University's current mascot, Robinson, is even on campus. That was because of Rodriguez. Robinson didn't go to UM because of Bo, the stadium, or winged helmets. He went to UM because of Rodriguez's offense. People tend to forget that.

    Many also fail to point out that the program's almost laughable Stuck in the Seventies culture was as much to blame for the Rodriguez fiasco as was Rodriguez himself. Rodriguez made a ton of mistakes, but he certainly didn't get a lot of help, either.

    Anyone. Anyplace. Anytime.

    rookmsu

  • First of all, for him to call Coach D and Stanford before he committed to UM says that the kid gets it. Lots of kids these days lack proper manners.. This kid sounds like he has proper respect for the process and handled things as well as he could.

    I hate Michigan, but I this kid seems like a good guy.

    Sparty2QP

  • Any chance that we can get elmer to decommitt? Dude is the best T prospect in this years class and hes a beast

    signature image signature image

    I have an MBA...Master at Being Amazing

    CalvinsJohnson8

  • Calvin'sJohnson said...

    Any chance that we can get elmer to decommitt? Dude is the best T prospect in this years class and hes a beast

    It will be tough but a Notre Dame melt down this season sure wouldn't hurt. This is going to be the make or break season for Kelly.

    82msuspartan