Online Now 2212

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1452
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2171
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Draymond in the NBA.

  • Day Day's a winner. He will win in the NBA.

    signature image

    Throwback702

  • Born2Kill said...

    His name comes up in the Bulls community quite a bit. Would fit that system very nicely.

    And the Bulls have plenty of athletes and energy guys. Wouldn't hurt them to throw a player with a solid all-around game on that roster.

    TheChosenOne30

  • he's gnna be a filler type guy off the bench if u ask me. a smart coach would use him in spurts at the 1,2,3,4 spots. this is part of the reason i really hope he falls to popovich, that guy would use him best and get the most out of him. his best weapon will be his versatility, im sorry, but intangibles are minimized at the pro level these days unless you are one of the top 3 or 4 guys on a team, which i dont see in him as much as i love what he did for us.

    but hey, id also love to be proven wrong by him

    603spartan

  • It really all depends on the team that drafts him. If you're playing the run and gun, I don't think you want him. But if you're more of a half court team, he can get you a few points and a few boards coming off the bench. There are a few teams that Draymond could be playing for right now, the Pistons being one of them. You need a team that is committed to rebounding, it wouldn't shock me to see the pistons draft him in the second round. But really, his better days are ahead of him. He may bounce around for one or two years, but once his outside jumper really gets good, and it's decent now, he'll stick with a team for a long time. I know I said he shouldn't be in a run and gun system, but I also think he's just the kind of player that the Heat could use. In fact, I see draymond being pretty similar to Udonis Haslem after a few years, and he's already better on the glass.

    Thepostmen

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    Guys, I know he can rebound IN COLLEGE that's why I compared him to another short power forward who could rebound IN THE NBA AND COLLEGE.

    Now he needs to show he can rebound IN THE NBA.

    Your caps lock button keeps sticking.

    signature image signature image signature image

    BrockMidlebrook

  • iCameron said...

    Ummm, no. I love Draymond, he's my favorite Spartan ever, but he's definitely never going to be what Charles Barkley was. He's a better passer than Barkley, but he's not nearly the scoring threat that Barkley was. Rebounding at the next level remains to be seen. This is no knock against Draymond, but Charles was one of the best PFs ever to play the game.

    CEILING.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • BrockMidlebrook said...

    Your caps lock button keeps sticking.

    lol

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • Thepostmen said...

    It really all depends on the team that drafts him. If you're playing the run and gun, I don't think you want him. But if you're more of a half court team, he can get you a few points and a few boards coming off the bench. There are a few teams that Draymond could be playing for right now, the Pistons being one of them. You need a team that is committed to rebounding, it wouldn't shock me to see the pistons draft him in the second round. But really, his better days are ahead of him. He may bounce around for one or two years, but once his outside jumper really gets good, and it's decent now, he'll stick with a team for a long time. I know I said he shouldn't be in a run and gun system, but I also think he's just the kind of player that the Heat could use. In fact, I see draymond being pretty similar to Udonis Haslem after a few years, and he's already better on the glass.

    Draymond deserves better than the Pistons, and I don't think he'd have much impact for them. I hate the Heat, but that would be a pretty good fit for him. He really belongs on an already solid team, good supporting players maximize his best talents.

    This post was edited by iCameron on 4/16/2012 at 5:48 PM

    http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

    iCameron

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    CEILING.

    I read what you wrote, but what you wrote was wrong and a little stupid. There's absolutely no way Draymond is mentioned in the same breath as Barkley. If even MSU fans are predicting him to be a solid rotation guy/6th man, that should tell you everything you need to know about where his actual ceiling is.

    http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

    iCameron

  • Charles Oakley.

    State00

  • iCameron said...

    I read what you wrote, but what you wrote was wrong and a little stupid. There's absolutely no way Draymond is mentioned in the same breath as Barkley. If even MSU fans are predicting him to be a solid rotation guy/6th man, that should tell you everything you need to know about where his actual ceiling is.

    Yeah, comparing a guys maximum potential to another chubby undersized PF who averaged 15.1 pts, 9.5 rebs, 2.1 asts, and 1.7 blocks his final year in college is just stupid and wrong.

    Pardon me.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • Stan Sitwell said...

    He rebounds QUITE well.

    In college. He's a 3 but too slow to make a serious impact.

    MSchott

  • he is not going to be a leading star on a team... but as a late 1st rounder on a good team such as a chicago or a miami or spurs for example... he would do a lot of damage as a complimentary player...

    sarcyspice

  • Omar Comin' said...

    There's no reason he can't do what Jared Dudley's doing.

    Well, there's a curious downvote.

    signature image

    Omar Comin19758

  • I've been saying all season that I think he'll go late first round, and I can see him fitting in way in San Antonio, Chicago, or even (ugh) Miami. If you can play solid defense (and despite him being a bit slower than most NBA 3s and a bit shorter than most 4s, I think that with his intelligence and if he studies plenty of tape, he absolutely can be an NBA defender), grab rebounds, and shoot the corner three, you can be the sixth or seventh man on a lot of NBA teams.

    As others have pointed out, he's not going to fit in with a team like Golden State or OKC that likes to run a lot. But for a team that plays plenty of half-court and grinds on defense, he can have a place, because when the game slows down, you can game-plan around your players' defensive limitations.

    There is certainly an abundance of freakish athletes in the NBA, and some of them are even good basketball players. But there's still room for diversity in the league, and you see plenty of players (DeJuan Blair, Ben Wallace, Corliss Williamson, etc.) who don't fit the molds and still have long, productive careers. A lot of that has to do with how badly players want it. If Draymond doesn't lose his work ethic, I absolutely think he'll have a 10+ year career as a top bench player and maybe even an occasional starter.

    voodoochile

  • I think he'll do well. He's got "it."

    signature image signature image signature image

    BrockMidlebrook

  • iCameron said...

    Draymond deserves better than the Pistons, and I don't think he'd have much impact for them. I hate the Heat, but that would be a pretty good fit for him. He really belongs on an already solid team, good supporting players maximize his best talents.

    The thing about Draymond is that he still has "potential". Yea, he's a senior which is a detriment in the draft, but he's still got to lose more weight and improve his jumper. And he's done that to a great extent already, I have little doubt that we're going to see a ripped draymond in 2 years, who can knock down the baseline jumper. Unlike a lot of NBA players, he's never going to be too skinny, he's got NBA strength already. And the Pistons aren't terrible, they're going to make the playoffs next year. Brandon Knight and Greg Monroe baby! Draymond is a more talented, less explosive Jason Maxiell.

    Thepostmen

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    Guys, I know he can rebound IN COLLEGE that's why I compared him to another short power forward who could rebound IN THE NBA AND COLLEGE.

    Now he needs to show he can rebound IN THE NBA.

    Nobody boxes out in the NBA. If he can do it in college, he can clean up in the NBA.

    This post was edited by JEK on 4/16/2012 at 8:50 PM

    "RCMB: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainry." - some dude from MgoBlog

    JEK

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    Yeah, comparing a guys maximum potential to another chubby undersized PF who averaged 15.1 pts, 9.5 rebs, 2.1 asts, and 1.7 blocks his final year in college is just stupid and wrong.

    Pardon me.

    Draymond will never do this:

    Play

    Charles Barkley vs. Warriors 1994 Playoffs...

    After making it to the finals in Charles Barkley's first year with the team in 1993, the Suns were one of the favorites to win the crown in the first post-Jordan year of 1994. They struggled through a somewhat difficult 56-26 season that placed them third in the West behind Seattle and Houston, and put them in a first-round matchup against the dangerous Golden State Warriors. The first two games of the series were close Phoenix wins, but Game 3 was in Golden State, and the Suns remembered how they fell behind 0-2 against the Lakers the previous season before rallying for the win. In particular, Charles Barkley remembered this, and was determined to end the Warriors season as soon as possible. Barkley came out with a vengeance, scoring 27 first-quarter points on his way to a 56-point outing, as the Suns won a wildly entertaining game to advance to the next round. Despite the loss, Golden State was supposed to have a bright future, thanks to the return of Tim Hardaway, the continued maturation of youngsters Chris Webber and Latrell Sprewell, and the steady play of Chris Mullin. Instead, they went 26-56 the next year, traded Webber for Tom Gugliotta, and went 12 years without returning to the playoffs. In a way, Barkley doomed the Warriors to more than a decade of futility with this performance. Announcers: Pete Van Wiren and Doug Collins.

    http://www.youtube.com/v/cAdMW4Hi8yI

    http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

    iCameron

  • iCameron said...

    Draymond will never do this:

    Yeah, I don't see Dray ever getting T'd up.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • Unless he develops nba 3 point range it will be tough.

    Who will he guard? Is he big enough to guard the nba 4? Quick enough to guard an nba 3?

    His best shot is to play against the 3 in the nba and get a little quicker. He should be able to post a three up and box them out the size he is now.

    He has great inagibles though and can do the little things like pass and draw charges. If he can get quicker or stronger he has a shot. He is a good size for college but the nba is a different beast where everyone is about 2 inches taller at every position.

    xwing

  • Late 1st- Early 2nd. Solid decade glue guy off the bench. Retires, begins coaching at MSU and is named the successor for Tom Izzo..... Wins national titles. The end.

    signature image

    Spartan8Ball