-
gobluego2 said...
He was not a projected starter. He sucked. Ricky Barnum has been the projected starter, with Khoury and Miller battling for 2nd string.
Khoury leaving is good news. He was essentially a worthless player. Opens up another scholarship in 2013 and allows us to get up to the goal of 22-24 spots for the 2013 class.
-
gobluego2 said...
He was not a projected starter. He sucked. Ricky Barnum has been the projected starter, with Khoury and Miller battling for 2nd string.
Khoury leaving is good news. He was essentially a worthless player. Opens up another scholarship in 2013 and allows us to get up to the goal of 22-24 spots for the 2013 class.
This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 3/16/2012 at 12:43 PM
Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.
SpartanRocky
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16721 votes total - Andrew Bell
- (22310)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gobluego2 said...
Jeremiah was a 4* on some sites, 3* on others. He didn't exactly have an impressive offer sheet either.
Campbell was a universal 5* on every site- kid had offers from every god damn school in the country.
Kid has never been coached until right now basically. Rich Rodriguez screwed up his development by not redshirting him as a true freshman, and then switching him from defense to offense back to defense as a sophomore.
Last year was basically his first year getting any kind of legitimate defensive coaching in his entire collegiate career. He was actually a productive role player. In the 2nd half against Virginia Tech in our bowl game- he played the best out of every defensive lineman on the team- Mike Martin included.
You guys talk so much shit about him because you want him to suck. He doesn't suck. He was actually pretty decent last year. If he continues to develop, he may still yet reach his potential.
-
gobluego2 said...
I can assure you that I am not an idiot or an MSU fan.
Rocko Khoury was not a good player. At all. When he went in for Molk he was absolutely terrible. Never showed flashes of any kind. Had trouble snapping the ball properly as well.
This is a non-event. He was not going to play over Barnum and he might not have beaten out a RS FR. in Miller to be the back-up center. Him leaving opens up another scholarship and might even allow Michigan to now take another OL in the 2013 class.
-
spartans17 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
3227 votes total - (2136)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gobluego2 said...
Holy shit. Are you kidding me? Michigan's defense essentially put the lid on VaTech's offense. Their offense scored 1 TD all game despite controlling the ball for nearly 40 minutes (believe it was like 38 and change) and averaged like 3 yards a rush. All this despite Michigan's offense shitting the bed and going 3 and out on nearly every god damn series.
The hate is strong with you. I like it though. Means Hoke and Co. must be doing something right.
-
AASpartan ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
9604 votes total - Your Favorite Moderator .
- (7400)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
8543 votes total - (16775)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BigDaddySpartan
- 5 stars Rating: 88
677 votes total - (711)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SpartanRocky
- 5 stars Rating: 90
16721 votes total - Andrew Bell
- (22310)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
8543 votes total - (16775)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
AASpartan ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
9604 votes total - Your Favorite Moderator .
- (7400)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
8543 votes total - (16775)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12


Football recruiting: MSU's avg. commit rating compared