Online Now 1874

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1299
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2054
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Homebrew Crew - what you been brewing?, Part Deux

  • I brewed my IPA today, which is probably more like a pale ale given that I missed my gravity by 12 points. Couldn't figure out why until I racked it to the fermenter and realized that I had an extra gallon of wort. Looks like I put an extra gallon in my sparge. Idiot.

    Oh well.

    This post was edited by BH Spartan on 4/3/2011 at 5:55 PM

    BH Spartan

  • So, after moths of research, reading, etc., I ordered my kit from Midwest yesterday and intend on brewing my first batch this weekend. I am deciding on whether to start with an amber ale or a wheat beer. The wheat would, obviously, be more seasonally appropriate, but being that it is my first batch I want something that may be rather forgiving for the brewing process. Any advice? Any opinions from those of you experienced brewers on whether I should go with the amber or the wheat?

    Klevin Torborg

  • Klevin Torborg said...

    So, after moths of research, reading, etc., I ordered my kit from Midwest yesterday and intend on brewing my first batch this weekend. I am deciding on whether to start with an amber ale or a wheat beer. The wheat would, obviously, be more seasonally appropriate, but being that it is my first batch I want something that may be rather forgiving for the brewing process. Any advice? Any opinions from those of you experienced brewers on whether I should go with the amber or the wheat?

    Like a hefeweizen or an American Wheat (Oberon)?

    Both are think are great starting off points, but think that a hefeweizen would be more foregiving. But why not buy both and do the other kit next week?

    BH Spartan

  • BH Spartan said...

    Like a hefeweizen or an American Wheat (Oberon)?

    Both are think are great starting off points, but think that a hefeweizen would be more foregiving. But why not buy both and do the other kit next week?

    It would be more of a hefeweizen (it is Brewer's Best's Weizenbier).

    Klevin Torborg

  • I'm not a huge hefe fan, but think that it would be more foregiving to brew than a pale. Also, you could make it really simple and just use 2 cans of wheat extract, an ounce of bittering hops, and a packet of dry yeast as your recipe - no need for specialty grains, multiple hop additions, liquid yeast and it like. But really the challenge in brewing is mashing technique (doesn't apply to extract brewing), yeast handling and pitching, and fermentation control. For either a pale or a hefe there are solid dry yeast options available which means that fermentation control is the last difficult variable to deal with. Given the cooler temps in MI, you should be fine if you have a basement or a cooler room in the house. A hefe, in my opinion, would have less potential for off-flavors if the temp during fermentation ramps up versus a pale ale.

    Just my two cents.

    BH Spartan

  • Looking for a chest freezer to convert to a kegerator. People on Craigslist are crazy if they think I'm going to fork over $100 for a USED chest freezer. Guess I'll have to wait until garage sale season.

    "People don't care how much you know until they know how much you care." - Mark Dantonio.

    JMSparty08

  • excuse my ignorance here, but wtf is a smack pack?

    Also, I will be doing my first brew this weekend. I figure for my first one I should use a kit, so I went to sicilianos mkt and bought a wheat beer kit. My parents used to brew beer, so I raided their basement and came back with a bunch of carboys and siphoning stuff.

    Do people use secondary fermenters with kits? Should I just let it do its thing in the primary for my first try?

    signature image

    BrodieMSU

  • BrodieMSU said...

    excuse my ignorance here, but wtf is a smack pack?

    Also, I will be doing my first brew this weekend. I figure for my first one I should use a kit, so I went to sicilianos mkt and bought a wheat beer kit. My parents used to brew beer, so I raided their basement and came back with a bunch of carboys and siphoning stuff.

    Do people use secondary fermenters with kits? Should I just let it do its thing in the primary for my first try?

    Self-activating yeast packet that you smack and watch it blow up like a balloon. I've only used one once. Personally, I've never had a problem with dry yeast and it's definitely cheaper to use dry.

    I've never used a secondary fermenter. Sometimes it can help with the sediment and stuff, but it's not really necessary unless you're going to add something to your beer (coffee, fruit, dry hopping, etc.). By not putting it in secondary, you're lowering the risk of contamination and oxidation (both things that will ruin your beer and all your hard work).

    For your first try, I'd try to adhere to the old Keep It Simple Stupid mantra.

    This post was edited by JMSparty08 on 4/4/2011 at 1:08 PM

    "People don't care how much you know until they know how much you care." - Mark Dantonio.

    JMSparty08

  • There seems to be a lot of debate around the need for a secondary fermenter. I think most beers are fine without it, though secondary can clear up some cloudy beers, if that is what you're after.

    Phil McCrackin

  • john winger said...

    if you are planning to do an all-wheat, good luck. i tried that 2 months ago and could not convert any starches to fermentable sugars with all-wheat grains. i made some banana beer bread, lol.

    i like what the other guy said, make a batch of both on the same day, just make each 3 gallons.

    remember wheat beers are supposed to be consumed fresh, so you will have to hop on that one right away. i fermented my american style wheat for only 3 weeks, then bottled it up.

    if you decide on the amber ale, give it a special kick and use a belgian yeast.

    This is my first batch, I will be using a kit. Want to start simple and build from there.

    Klevin Torborg

  • Phil McCrackin said...

    There seems to be a lot of debate around the need for a secondary fermenter. I think most beers are fine without it, though secondary can clear up some cloudy beers, if that is what you're after.

    I use a secondary if I either want to try to clear up the beer or add flavor (coffee, fruit, hot peppers). Otherwise I just go straight from primary carboy to the keg.

    TX Sparty

  • BrodieMSU said...

    moving to the Brighton area

    I started home brewing myself about 3 months ago. I love it. There's just no better feeling than getting drunk off booze that you made yourself. I went over to "Things Beer" at the Michigan Brewing company. They sold me a kit for about $100 with all the things I needed to start. I've since then purchased other items as I've refined my process, but they were very helpful in getting started.
    Right now, I'm drinking a clone of Bell's Best Brown Ale. Turned out really good. I'm in secondary fermentation of my whiskey barrel stout. I got some of those Jack Daniels chips that are used for smokers and marinated them in a pint of Jack for two weeks. Now the beer just has to sit on them for a few more weeks before bottling. Finding the perfect marriage of whiskey and beer is my goal. Now if only I could find a way to actually drink this beer out of a girls tits, I could die a happy man.

    This post was edited by OPatMSU on 4/4/2011 at 1:33 PM

    signature image

    You're in college. The window of opportunity to drink and do drugs and take advantage of young girls is getting smaller by the day.

    OPatMSU

  • When using a secondary fermenter, do you usually wait 7 days for the initial yeast activation to end, then rack it to the secondary for another 7 days, then bottle? I will be using carboys as primary and secondary fermenters, when I rack it to the secondary, do I just use a siphon straight to the bottom of the secondary? Does that create too much mix with oxygen?

    I told my wife the first one I did would be a wheat + some raspberry puree in the secondary for a kind of raspberry wheat.

    signature image

    BrodieMSU

  • I've never used fruit puree, but my understanding is that you can just mix it in your bottling bucket - no need to secondary. If you are doing a wheat beer, I wouldn't put it in secondary - it probably won't clear much anyway and no real benefit bulk aging a wheat beer.

    As for how long you keep it in primary, the "correct answer" is until it is done fermenting - your final gravity reading doesn't change. My lazy answer is to keep it for 2 weeks regardless then you don't have to worry about taking readings. But it should be done within 7 days if you are in more of a hurry.

    BH Spartan

  • BrodieMSU said...

    When using a secondary fermenter, do you usually wait 7 days for the initial yeast activation to end, then rack it to the secondary for another 7 days, then bottle? I will be using carboys as primary and secondary fermenters, when I rack it to the secondary, do I just use a siphon straight to the bottom of the secondary? Does that create too much mix with oxygen?

    I told my wife the first one I did would be a wheat + some raspberry puree in the secondary for a kind of raspberry wheat.

    I can't imagine any beer is ready to be moved from primary after just 7 days. Wait at least 14, then check the gravity for a few days to make sure it's stable.

    Phil McCrackin

  • Phil McCrackin said...

    I can't imagine any beer is ready to be moved from primary after just 7 days. Wait at least 14, then check the gravity for a few days to make sure it's stable.

    Really? I'd say that if you making an ale and it isn't done fermenting within 7 days then you need to rethinkg your yeast handling. That being said, I'm a proponent of leaving it in primary for at least 2 weeks - preferrably more - but it should be fully fermented within 7 days.

    BH Spartan

  • Question for those that use a carboy as a primary fermenter...

    Do you pitch wort and yeast directly into the carboy using a funnel or something, or do you do it in a bucket, then siphon into a carboy?

    I was brewing yesterday and I've typically used a bucket as a primary and a carboy as a secondary, but thinking I may skip the secondary on this batch and just use the carboy as a primary. Then I realized I had no way to get the wort into the carboy without using a siphon.

    On a related note, do you have any problems aerating the wort in a carboy? (shaking the carboy, as opposed to some kind of aeration stone or something)

    Phil McCrackin

  • Has anyone ever done a barely wine? I'm curious how they taste. I've had beers that are 11-12% alcohol and they usually aren't that good. Is barley wine any different?

    signature image

    You're in college. The window of opportunity to drink and do drugs and take advantage of young girls is getting smaller by the day.

    OPatMSU

  • BH Spartan said...

    Really? I'd say that if you making an ale and it isn't done fermenting within 7 days then you need to rethinkg your yeast handling. That being said, I'm a proponent of leaving it in primary for at least 2 weeks - preferrably more - but it should be fully fermented within 7 days.

    I've never checked gravity before 10-12 days, but it seems like I've seen my airlock bubbling occasionally at 6-7 days.

    I could be wrong. I'm still learning here too. lol What part of "yeast handling" do you mean?

    Phil McCrackin

  • Phil McCrackin said...

    Question for those that use a carboy as a primary fermenter...

    Do you pitch wort and yeast directly into the carboy using a funnel or something, or do you do it in a bucket, then siphon into a carboy?

    I was brewing yesterday and I've typically used a bucket as a primary and a carboy as a secondary, but thinking I may skip the secondary on this batch and just use the carboy as a primary. Then I realized I had no way to get the wort into the carboy without using a siphon.

    On a related note, do you have any problems aerating the wort in a carboy? (shaking the carboy, as opposed to some kind of aeration stone or something)

    I used a funnel the 1 or 2 times I used a carboy. It was cool seeing the fermentation, but to me wasn't worth the hastle. I'm a bucket man now. I think it would be easier to aerate by picking it up and shaking it.

    BH Spartan

  • john winger said...

    one of my favorite sayings about yeast goes "she is ready when she is ready"

    some yeasts are so stubborn they take 3-4 days before taking off (another reason to use the starter)

    the one half is the actual fermentation process which usually completes in 7-10 days. the other half is striving for clarity and eliminating off flavors. yeast make a big huge mess when they multiply in the 1000's like they do. give them extra time to clean up their mess and you have a much better beer.

    I would also add that dry yeast seems to take longer to get going than liquid yeast. The batch I pitched yesterday evening using liquid yeast was bubbling away this morning,10 hours after I pitched. My first few batches with dry yeast took a few days to get going.

    Next batch I will use a starter.

    Phil McCrackin

  • Phil McCrackin said...

    Question for those that use a carboy as a primary fermenter...

    Do you pitch wort and yeast directly into the carboy using a funnel or something, or do you do it in a bucket, then siphon into a carboy?

    I was brewing yesterday and I've typically used a bucket as a primary and a carboy as a secondary, but thinking I may skip the secondary on this batch and just use the carboy as a primary. Then I realized I had no way to get the wort into the carboy without using a siphon.

    On a related note, do you have any problems aerating the wort in a carboy? (shaking the carboy, as opposed to some kind of aeration stone or something)

    I use a funnel with a strainer built in and go from my boil pot to a bucket. I aerate with a paint stirrer attached to a drill, and pitch my yeast while it is in the bucket. Then I'll siphon off to a carboy to separate the wort from any trub I may have missed while straining. I could probably keep it in the bucket for the whole primary fermentation and not notice a difference though.

    signature image

    You're in college. The window of opportunity to drink and do drugs and take advantage of young girls is getting smaller by the day.

    OPatMSU

  • You have to be careful with airlocks - the wort could be fully fermented (I guess it is beer and not wort at this point) and still be releasing CO2, causing your airlock to bubble. I think you are doing the right thing by not touching it for 10-12 days, but I'm guessing it is done fermenting well before that.

    By yeast handling, I mean pitching the right amount of healthy yeast. I'm a big believer in using an active yeast starter - I am usually done fermenting within 3-4 days for ales, including big belgians and barley wines.

    As for the guy that said something about barleywines - I'd recommend going out and buying one or two to check it out. I've brewed a few and they really aren't much different than other beers, except you need to pay special attention to your recipe (may need to add sugar), yeast (you need a lot of it) and fermentation temps (really need to ferment cool to avoid excess alcohol flavors from developing).

    BH Spartan

  • Be careful adding the puree to the bottling bucket. The puree will have fermentable sugars that would be hard to account for when bottling. You might make some bottle bombs if you get a second fermentation in the bottle. I would do a little research on when to add the fruit puree- if it is added during the primary fermentation, you might get a wine-y type taste to it. Maybe add it to the secondary if you want to get the raspberry flavor. If you're not doing a secondary, see if you can get raspberry flavoring- that wouldn't have fermentable sugar in it.

    117 Louis

  • 117 Louis said...

    Be careful adding the puree to the bottling bucket. The puree will have fermentable sugars that would be hard to account for when bottling. You might make some bottle bombs if you get a second fermentation in the bottle. I would do a little research on when to add the fruit puree- if it is added during the primary fermentation, you might get a wine-y type taste to it. Maybe add it to the secondary if you want to get the raspberry flavor. If you're not doing a secondary, see if you can get raspberry flavoring- that wouldn't have fermentable sugar in it.

    Good call - meant fruit extract can be added to the bottling bucket. Bottling puree would not be wise.........

    Blueberry Flavoring - Fruit - Flavorings - Ingredients

    Blueberry extract flavoring in alcohol base, 4 oz.

    www.northernbrewer.com

    BH Spartan