Online Now 3761

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2648
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 3527
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Lions draft is absolutely terrible

  • ICEatALAMO said...

    Or else.....see the title of this thread

    and....

    signature image

    RPMadMSU

  • Gilmore is a gambler at DB and is much more prone to getting burned deep than Claiborne or Kirkpatrick.

    The knock on Kirkpatrick from my perspective is that he still gets by to an extent on potential and athleticism, which after 3 years under Saban is a concern. He's also injury prone, with a recurring shoulder injury that could be a major problem long term.

    I would rank the corners like this:
    1. Claiborne

    2. Kirkpatrick
    3. Gilmore
    4. Jenkins

    Tide06

  • Mine would be:

    1. Jenkins
    2. Claiborne
    3. Gilmore
    4. Kirkpatrick

    signature image

    "Come and take them"

    ICEatALAMO

  • I haven't seen this name mentioned for Detroit in the 2nd/3rd round at all, but I really like Jeff Allen, the OT from Illinois. The guy, in my opinion, has a similar amount of talent to any OT iprojected to go in late 1st round or later in the draft...he is a model of consistency too. What am I missing? He is a borderline 1st round prospect, in my opinion, and would be well worth a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

    If the stars aligned, I'd love to see Detroit go with the following for the first three rounds:

    1) Doug Martin - RB
    2) Janoris Jenkins - CB
    3) Jeff Allen - OT

    Numbers Game

  • Even though I usually disagree with you, alamo, I appreciate your role as an antagonist, better than just everybody agreeing with each other. And, you might not be far off with your CB rankings. Having Jenkins ahead of Claiborne seems a little extreme, I mean, if he were that good, off the field stuff wouldn't matter and he'd be a top 10 draft pick easy. But, it's not crazy to think he's better than Gilmore and Kirkpatrick, who I'm not totally sold on to begin with. There was some talk on another thread about taking another position at 23 and then trading up in the 2nd round to get Jenkins, I would love that. But, the Lions have been so hush hush about Jenkins, and they've drafted people who they haven't brought in to work out, at this point it wouldn't be a shock. This time of the year, it's important to remember that all of these mocks are usually horribly wrong, we don't really know what teams think about Gilmore and Kirkpatrick - it's not outside the realm of possibility that they are both there when we pick.

    Thepostmen

  • Numbers Game said...

    I haven't seen this name mentioned for Detroit in the 2nd/3rd round at all, but I really like Jeff Allen, the OT from Illinois. The guy, in my opinion, has a similar amount of talent to any OT iprojected to go in late 1st round or later in the draft...he is a model of consistency too. What am I missing? He is a borderline 1st round prospect, in my opinion, and would be well worth a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

    If the stars aligned, I'd love to see Detroit go with the following for the first three rounds:

    1) Doug Martin - RB 2) Janoris Jenkins - CB 3) Jeff Allen - OT

    The Doug Martin talk is really picking up steam. Mike Maycock, the best in the business, actually has him going one pick in front of us. So it seems like this is more and more of a possibility. As much as it kind of stinks, the Lions really have 1 RB to open the season, Kevin Smith, we don't know about Best and LeShoure will be suspended. RB is a definete possibility.

    Thepostmen

  • No RB for first 2-3 rounds plz!

    San Juan Kid

  • Thepostmen said...

    Even though I usually disagree with you, alamo, I appreciate your role as an antagonist, better than just everybody agreeing with each other. And, you might not be far off with your CB rankings. Having Jenkins ahead of Claiborne seems a little extreme, I mean, if he were that good, off the field stuff wouldn't matter and he'd be a top 10 draft pick easy. But, it's not crazy to think he's better than Gilmore and Kirkpatrick, who I'm not totally sold on to begin with. There was some talk on another thread about taking another position at 23 and then trading up in the 2nd round to get Jenkins, I would love that. But, the Lions have been so hush hush about Jenkins, and they've drafted people who they haven't brought in to work out, at this point it wouldn't be a shock. This time of the year, it's important to remember that all of these mocks are usually horribly wrong, we don't really know what teams think about Gilmore and Kirkpatrick - it's not outside the realm of possibility that they are both there when we pick.

    I would like that too, but it will be a dangerous game trying to trade up. Usually I am not a huge fan of trading up, unless it is in the first 10 picks and you just "need" a guy. For a team like the Lions, I don't think they have the luxury of trading picks to move up. My guess is that the Lions are too afraid to move on Jenkins. They've had a run of off the field issues since the end of their season. Like I said, personally I don't care about that. Taking Doug Martin would not be too crazy, you are right people are high on him. As much I hate to take a RB, because he had been so unsuccessful at that, but that has also created a position of need. I said I would be upset if they didn't take a corner in the first round, but I will detract that. If they went OL, like if Reiff is still there, then by all means. There would still be an outside shot at getting Jenkins still too, but I doubt he is there at 54. You are right, the draft is way too unpredictable, real time trades and such screw everything up, but still fun to speculate.

    signature image

    "Come and take them"

    ICEatALAMO

  • ICEatALAMO said...

    I would like that too, but it will be a dangerous game trying to trade up. Usually I am not a huge fan of trading up, unless it is in the first 10 picks and you just "need" a guy. For a team like the Lions, I don't think they have the luxury of trading picks to move up. My guess is that the Lions are too afraid to move on Jenkins. They've had a run of off the field issues since the end of their season. Like I said, personally I don't care about that. Taking Doug Martin would not be too crazy, you are right people are high on him. As much I hate to take a RB, because he had been so unsuccessful at that, but that has also created a position of need. I said I would be upset if they didn't take a corner in the first round, but I will detract that. If they went OL, like if Reiff is still there, then by all means. There would still be an outside shot at getting Jenkins still too, but I doubt he is there at 54. You are right, the draft is way too unpredictable, real time trades and such screw everything up, but still fun to speculate.

    I think we just need to see what value is there at 23. If they take a DT, WR, QB or TE; I'll be unhappy. Every other position could use a little bit of help. I don't see any standout linebackers at the moment so I'd probably grumble about a pick there. We could use upgrades at DE (more of an upcoming problem for 2013), RB (does anyone really trust our current group), OL (Backus and Raiola getting old, Gosder being Gosder, and Peterman being Peterman), and DB's (I really don't want to see Aaron Berry or Amari Spievey starting in another playoff game). That gives four positions where I see possible value. Jenkins has the most upside of any player in that spot but also the most red flags. If they take him, we just need to hold our breaths.

    sprtnbrn

  • +1, I pretty much agree with everything you said, down to grumbling about an LB pick.

    signature image

    "Come and take them"

    ICEatALAMO

  • sprtnbrn said...

    I think we just need to see what value is there at 23. If they take a DT, WR, QB or TE; I'll be unhappy. Every other position could use a little bit of help. I don't see any standout linebackers at the moment so I'd probably grumble about a pick there. We could use upgrades at DE (more of an upcoming problem for 2013), RB (does anyone really trust our current group), OL (Backus and Raiola getting old, Gosder being Gosder, and Peterman being Peterman), and DB's (I really don't want to see Aaron Berry or Amari Spievey starting in another playoff game). That gives four positions where I see possible value. Jenkins has the most upside of any player in that spot but also the most red flags. If they take him, we just need to hold our breaths.

    I agree wholeheartedly with your post. The DT, QB, WR and TE positions are probably the only ones off limits at #23. There could be some great values at the other slots. I would not complain if they chose any other position, and it is going to be interesting to see which players they have to choose from.

    We could concievably see any of the following players that most project in the 1st round available at #23:

    RB - Doug Martin
    OL - Cordy Glenn/Amini Silatolu
    DE - Whitney Mercilus/Chandler Jones
    LB - Dont'a Hightower/Courtney Upshaw
    CB - Janoris Jenkins/Stephon Gilmore/Dre Kirkpatrick

    I would probably rank them the following:

    1) Stephon Gilmore - have to take him if he's there. Starts right away, and doesn't come with the baggage of other CBs.
    2) Doug Martin - I think there is a large drop off at RB after this, though LaMichael James would be a good find in the 2nd/3rd.
    3) Cordy Glenn - probably starts at RG from day 1, and has versatility to move to OT. I couldn't argue if they favored him more than Martin.
    4) Dre Kirkpatrick - solid CB, would start right away, but does he fit the scheme well?
    5) Courtney Upshaw - versatile rush LB/DE who could see time at multiple positions.
    6) Whitney Mercilus - Frees up Avril as trade bait, and bolsters the DEs.
    7) Chandler Jones - Same idea as Mercilus, but who does Detroit like better of the two?
    8) Amini Silatolu - Might be reaching at 23 a bit, but they may like him more than Cordy Glenn.
    9) Janoris Jenkins - I really like him, and he may be the most talented CB in the draft, but I'd much rather take him with the 2nd rounder.
    10) Dont'a Hightower - I might be underrating him, but though he is talented, I don't know that he fills a need right now, and likely wouldn't start over our current LBs.

    Thoughts?

    This post was edited by Numbers Game on 4/26/2012 at 12:21 PM

    Numbers Game

  • San Juan Kid said...

    No RB for first 2-3 rounds plz!

    Why? They need one and if he's the best player available it seems to be a no brainer. Why draft a guy like, say, Mike Adams who is a giant question mark and who will be a backup for at least a year when there's a RB available who will start from day 1 and be your workhorse?

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • Also the Lions brought in for visits: CB- 6 players, DE- 6, WR- 6, RB- 6, G- 5, T- 5, S- 2, TE- 2, LB- 1, C- 1. So I'd look for their draft shape up similar to that.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    Also the Lions brought in for visits: CB- 6 players, DE- 6, WR- 6, RB- 6, G- 5, T- 5, S- 2, TE- 2, LB- 1, C- 1. So I'd look for their draft shape up similar to that.

    Except Mayhew has used visits as smokescreens before.

    signature image

    RPMadMSU

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    Why? They need one and if he's the best player available it seems to be a no brainer. Why draft a guy like, say, Mike Adams who is a giant question mark and who will be a backup for at least a year when there's a RB available who will start from day 1 and be your workhorse?

    Because unless there is a serious issue with Leshoure (long suspension) they don't need one and what they need on offense is young lineman.

    MSchott

  • MSchott said...

    Because unless there is a serious issue with Leshoure (long suspension) they don't need one and what they need on offense is young lineman.

    Serious issue with Leshoure? Forgetting the weed eating thing, he did just blow out his achilles last year... I don't know, some people might consider that a serious issue.

    Also, I remember last year scraping the waiver wires for running backs and even desperately making a trade only to find out that your starting running back at the time had a freaking brain tumor thus negating the trade and his career.

    I don't remember the OL being in that bad a shape and actually being ok last year. Now while I do agree that they need youth and depth on the OL, they already have Fox and Culbreath and could possibly get value later in the draft, instead of reaching early.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • RBs are becoming less and less important in the NFL.

    Waste of a pick if they take one in the 1st or 2nd round

    "Put your mother in a straight-jacket you punk ass white boy." ~ Mike Tyson

    tig ol bitties19581

  • tig ol' bitties said...

    RBs are becoming less and less important in the NFL.

    Waste of a pick if they take one in the 1st or 2nd round

    This is bullshit... Having 1 running back carry the load, as opposed to multiple running backs, has lessened... but when you're a team coming off a year with ZERO running backs, drafting one that you know will start from day 1 is not a waste.

    And further, I'd argue that not having a capable running back to keep the opposing defense honest will hurt your QB more than having a league average LT, not to mention hurt your defense.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp

  • Plate of Shrimp said...

    Serious issue with Leshoure? Forgetting the weed eating thing, he did just blow out his achilles last year... I don't know, some people might consider that a serious issue.

    Also, I remember last year scraping the waiver wires for running backs and even desperately making a trade only to find out that your starting running back at the time had a freaking brain tumor thus negating the trade and his career.

    I don't remember the OL being in that bad a shape and actually being ok last year. Now while I do agree that they need youth and depth on the OL, they already have Fox and Culbreath and could possibly get value later in the draft, instead of reaching early.

    That's why I said serious issue. Players fully recover from blown Achilles all the time. If it's found that he is not fully recovered and will never be 100% (doubtful) that's a different story but either way overall the Lions even without a number one back can score like there's no tomorrow but can't stop other teams. It's a no brainer to go defense with your first pick.

    MSchott

  • tig ol' bitties said...

    RBs are becoming less and less important in the NFL.

    Waste of a pick if they take one in the 1st or 2nd round

    Completely agree. Why the fuck would we blow a first or second round pick on Doug Martin? Someone has gotten a little too much Kiper juice in their hair. If you'd like a speedy, under 6ft, RB with good vision why not take a higher profile DB or OT with the first two picks and possibly even the third because you can get a guy like Baker in the 4th, or later for god's sake.

    Skip1856

  • Jenkins has 4 kids and was a big enough thug to get thrown out of the dumpster fire that was UF at the end of the Meyer regime and you would take him over a kid who the LSU coaches say was a better cover corner than PP7, had no issues off the field and was productive his entire career?

    Not sure where to start with that.

    Tide06

  • For the Doug Martin fans.
    100 plus YD games last season, against
    Nevada
    Colorado State
    San Diego State
    Wyoming
    New Mexico
    Pretty poopy competition. Not suggesting Doug Martin isn't going to be a productive RB at the next level. Just saying Trent Richardson is the only one I'd burn a first round pick on. Martin Mahew is alot smarter than me though.

    Skip1856

  • Skip1856 said...

    For the Doug Martin fans. 100 plus YD games last season, against Nevada Colorado State San Diego State Wyoming New Mexico Pretty poopy competition. Not suggesting Doug Martin isn't going to be a productive RB at the next level. Just saying Trent Richardson is the only one I'd burn a first round pick on. Martin Mahew is alot smarter than me though.

    Just remember, anytime a player "blows up" or starts to "head down" in dramatic fashion right before the draft, that is the work of clubs "leaking" info anonymously to multiple sources to better position themselves to get the player they want...

    mentalstate

  • Much rather have the Lions select Jonas Gray in the later rounds than Doug Martin in rounds 1-2.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Doo Rag Dan

  • I'm not a big Doug Martin fan or a fan of taking a RB early, in a perfect world we'd get a CB who is BPA, but if Doug Martin happens to be the BPA then I'd take him.

    signature image

    Plate of Shrimp