Online Now 2554

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1719
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2411
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

MLive - MSU listed as one of 5 darkhorse nat. champ contenders

  • Spartan_Don said...

    "74,000!"..."Disappointed Fans!" "74,000!"..."Disappointed Fans!" "74,000!"..."Disappointed Fans!"

    0:29 in.

    the throwback to Boller was the end of Bobby for me. I almost had a stroke I was screaming so hard at the stupidity of our defense. My god what a miserable saturday that was.

    ETA: I blame the miserable failure of 2002 on those godawful jerseys. My god those things were fucking ugly as sin. I hope whoever decided those were a good idea was bitten by a moose and then sacked.

    This post was edited by boozhoo on 6/20/2012 at 11:09 PM

    signature image

    boozhoo

  • Cuba Gooding Jr said...

    This is what I was thinking. It's one thing to say that every game on the schedule is winnable. I think all of us would agree that is the case. We might even be favored in every game. But just being "favored" and winning 13 games in a row is statistically improbable. Most of the teams that actually run the table are drastically better than most of the teams of their schedule.

    not really....they also have a lot of good fortune in lucky bounces, lack of injuries, and so on. Even the greatest teams have to win a few games by a FG late in the game to go undefeated. It doesn't matter how good you are, it's just damned hard to play your best week in and week out and fight through injuries, turnovers, bad calls, shitty weather, and the host of other problems that can turn a win into a loss on a single play.

    signature image

    boozhoo

  • RBW Spartan said...

    I don't get the fear of Boise. They lose 22 of 24 starters. This isn't the boise of....well ever. It's a completely new team.

    I was at the Boise - VT game a few years ago. We would have destroyed both of those teams last year; I ain't worried. I'm worried about @ Wisky and UNL.

    yeah...I've felt for a while now that this game will be the opposite of YSU last year. I honestly think we're going to beat their asses and they will struggle to score. I see it as a 27-10 kind of game.

    signature image

    boozhoo

  • I think its a 9 game gauntlet to go undefeated. There are 4 games I see no chance of losing. CMU, EMU, Minn and IU. Boise, ND, OSU, Iowa, UM, Wisc, Neb, Illinois and the CCG all present challenges and are far from gimmies. Injuries and playing 10 straight weeks without a bye are going to test this team. But almost every B1G team faces similar challenges. Its highly unlikely that there is an undefeated team and maybe not even a 1 loss team in the end. The league looks very strong and has no clear cut favorite.

    82msuspartan

  • copemoney0 said...

    Early Game of the Year lines from Vegas have MSU a favorite in every game except two.. +6 at UM and +5 at Wisky

    gawd I love both those lines! sign me up. scUM is a straight up win for us and wiscy will be 3 points or less either way.

    vagivore

  • JEK said...

    It's not so much fear as it is respecting a quality opponent. It's a game we should win, but you never know. See ND last year.

    Oline was a trainwreck in that game...that and the old unbalanced line we trotted out there...think Burkland went down early that game with a young ol and that was that. Not remotely the case this year. Don't see a scary weakness to this team. That is the beauty of what Coach D has done. Finds talented players that fit the system and coaches them up. To the point where you can't sniff the field as a true. That is how good our Coach is...just wow. Obviously Maxwell is the question mark....Yet he has been in the system long time, Joe! And has been throwing to the receivers against OUR D yes OUR D for the last couple years. Arnett coming in is only gonna help. Bell RB is going full beast mode. Simms TE is gonna be huge for us this fall.

    vagivore

  • Emerald Green said...

    I appreciate your point of view.

    My take is that many of us have to live and work in and around UM fans, and them beating Alabama is not something I want to listen to...until the end of time. Since my rooting has no effect on the game, and I don't think UM has much of a chance anyway, I feel comfortable rooting for Alabama and the former MSU coaches that are on the staff.

    While it is possible that at the end of the season it definitely could have a very small effect on MSU's future, I don't feel that it is enough for me to worry myself about. I think I look more toward them getting crushed and Brady Hoke being exposed...for exactly what you get when you listen to him...and UM being damaged in the big picture, not just one season.

    fair enough emerald,

    i have read many a post between um/msu fans, and i know there is no love lost between u two fan bases...

    we (osu fans) have our own beef with um, so i wont jump into the middle of the um/msu rivalry, but i will say i am rooting for both of u guys during ur ooc games and whomever you meet in ur bowl games!

    btw, congrats on a great game last yr against my bucks in the shoe! (that defense you all have have is pretty darn good!)

    a2brutus

  • boozhoo said...

    yeah...I've felt for a while now that this game will be the opposite of YSU last year. I honestly think we're going to beat their asses and they will struggle to score. I see it as a 27-10 kind of game.

    from an outside perspective,

    msu should roll...peterson is a great coach and boise will bring it, but, in the end msu wears em down and wins easily at home...

    msu by 17

    a2brutus

  • Count gHostula said...

    I'm torn - I hate Michigan but at the same time it would be great for B1G if um beat Alabama - so long as they beat ND too but lose their conference games

    No it wouldn't. The B1G is better when it's not te Big 2 Little 8, regardless what the press say (The press loves dynasties for some reason).

    With Meyer, and a M victory over Alabana we'd hear nothing about the rest of the conference, and neither would the rest of the country.

    In a sport that is entirely based on perception, flying under the radar doesn't help, and if M beats Alabama, that's all we'd be doing. If Alabama wins, it's an expected non story.

    signature image

    RPMadMSU

  • a2brutus said...

    its not about anyone thinking um is good. its about getting to the title game...

    if um beats bama, and msu runs the table that would be a double win for msu ( a loss to bama helps ur natl title hopes) that is what the thread is about)....

    i understand about the hatred for um (im a buckeye fan!) but this is business (getting to the natl title game) look at the big picture....

    btw, i wont lose sleep over a um loss, but it does help us when they win....

    Until someone beats an SEC team in the NC game, it doesn't matter what they do in the season. Last year was an abomination, I don't care that Bama might have been the best team in football, they somehow got a second chance because they were in the SEC. No other conference can lose a game at home to a rival and still make it to the NC game without winning their own conference.

    I want to see um humiliated and destroyed. I want to see the coaches adn players refusing to come out in the 4th quarter because of the ass whooping they have been taking. I want that program to fail until their fans learn what humility is.

    The B1G has its own perception problems because in the 2000's they went for short term gain over long term success. Sending 2 teams to BCS bowls every year, disrupting the order of who plays who in bowl games did more to hurt the image of the B1G than anything else. A strong um doesn't mean shit if the B1G goes 5-1 in bowl games.

    um winning games may help you guys out, but it doesn't matter anymore because of the CCG. MSU has to control its own destiny, we don't get favors from Delany, we dont' get to play ineligible players and make it to a BCS game. We don't get to ask a BCS president, who is an alum of our school, to pick the weakest possible opponent for us because we suck. No, we go out there and have to actually earn it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Now knowing what 1995 is like all over again! Thank you 247 technology!!

    InTenSity

  • InTenSity said...

    Until someone beats an SEC team in the NC game, it doesn't matter what they do in the season. Last year was an abomination, I don't care that Bama might have been the best team in football, they somehow got a second chance because they were in the SEC. No other conference can lose a game at home to a rival and still make it to the NC game without winning their own conference.

    I want to see um humiliated and destroyed. I want to see the coaches adn players refusing to come out in the 4th quarter because of the ass whooping they have been taking. I want that program to fail until their fans learn what humility is.

    The B1G has its own perception problems because in the 2000's they went for short term gain over long term success. Sending 2 teams to BCS bowls every year, disrupting the order of who plays who in bowl games did more to hurt the image of the B1G than anything else. A strong um doesn't mean shit if the B1G goes 5-1 in bowl games.

    um winning games may help you guys out, but it doesn't matter anymore because of the CCG. MSU has to control its own destiny, we don't get favors from Delany, we dont' get to play ineligible players and make it to a BCS game. We don't get to ask a BCS president, who is an alum of our school, to pick the weakest possible opponent for us because we suck. No, we go out there and have to actually earn it.

    ohhh kayyy...

    i agree with the sec stuf,f but like you said, until someone beats them they will get the nod..that is precisely my point...

    going undefeated in the B1G will be almost impossible for all of us with the addition of Neb. and the ccg so if any of us want to even sniff at a title shot we need our rivals to do well before and after we beat them...plus, isnt beating ur rival even more gratifying when they are ranked high and acting coky? I love beating um anytime, but in 2006 when they were #2 and undefeated it was 100x more satisfying)

    i dont claim to understand the hatred that msu has for um (altho i can imagine its pretty intense because of the "lil bro" comments and the arrogance some um fans have even in the face of 4 straight defeats to you guys) i can tell you this, if they treated us like that then I would react the same way and hope they get killed every week...So u r correct there.

    re: osu playing weak opp's cuz we suck???? not sure i understand how oregon, lsu, fla, tex, miami, and ark can be considered "weak" opp's...when we played them, oregon won the pac 10, lsu won the sec, tex was very good, miami was theee team and ark was runnerup in the sec...

    lastly, u r correct, tress should have suspended the tat 5 and they would have missed probably 4 games, however, he lied and it cost him his job and pryor's senior season where another bcs game was likely (maybe even the n/c)...

    i am happy for the success msu has enjoyed and i hope it continues,and when a playoff finally arrives, then rooting for ur rivals in ooc is less necessary...imo

    a2brutus

  • a2brutus said...

    ohhh kayyy...

    i agree with the sec stuf,f but like you said, until someone beats them they will get the nod..that is precisely my point...

    going undefeated in the B1G will be almost impossible for all of us with the addition of Neb. and the ccg so if any of us want to even sniff at a title shot we need our rivals to do well before and after we beat them...plus, isnt beating ur rival even more gratifying when they are ranked high and acting coky? I love beating um anytime, but in 2006 when they were #2 and undefeated it was 100x more satisfying)

    i dont claim to understand the hatred that msu has for um (altho i can imagine its pretty intense because of the "lil bro" comments and the arrogance some um fans have even in the face of 4 straight defeats to you guys) i can tell you this, if they treated us like that then I would react the same way and hope they get killed every week...So u r correct there.

    re: osu playing weak opp's cuz we suck???? not sure i understand how oregon, lsu, fla, tex, miami, and ark can be considered "weak" opp's...when we played them, oregon won the pac 10, lsu won the sec, tex was very good, miami was theee team and ark was runnerup in the sec...

    lastly, u r correct, tress should have suspended the tat 5 and they would have missed probably 4 games, however, he lied and it cost him his job and pryor's senior season where another bcs game was likely (maybe even the n/c)...

    i am happy for the success msu has enjoyed and i hope it continues,and when a playoff finally arrives, then rooting for ur rivals in ooc is less necessary...imo

    You wrote all that without a capital letter. I think that may be some sort of record.

    I gave up trying after the first paragraph.

    Edit: On further review, you capitalized 1 word. So you don't even get points for being consistant.

    This post was edited by RPMadMSU on 6/21/2012 at 2:58 PM

    signature image

    RPMadMSU

  • a2brutus said...

    ohhh kayyy...

    i agree with the sec stuf,f but like you said, until someone beats them they will get the nod..that is precisely my point...

    going undefeated in the B1G will be almost impossible for all of us with the addition of Neb. and the ccg so if any of us want to even sniff at a title shot we need our rivals to do well before and after we beat them...plus, isnt beating ur rival even more gratifying when they are ranked high and acting coky? I love beating um anytime, but in 2006 when they were #2 and undefeated it was 100x more satisfying)

    i dont claim to understand the hatred that msu has for um (altho i can imagine its pretty intense because of the "lil bro" comments and the arrogance some um fans have even in the face of 4 straight defeats to you guys) i can tell you this, if they treated us like that then I would react the same way and hope they get killed every week...So u r correct there.

    re: osu playing weak opp's cuz we suck???? not sure i understand how oregon, lsu, fla, tex, miami, and ark can be considered "weak" opp's...when we played them, oregon won the pac 10, lsu won the sec, tex was very good, miami was theee team and ark was runnerup in the sec...

    lastly, u r correct, tress should have suspended the tat 5 and they would have missed probably 4 games, however, he lied and it cost him his job and pryor's senior season where another bcs game was likely (maybe even the n/c)...

    i am happy for the success msu has enjoyed and i hope it continues,and when a playoff finally arrives, then rooting for ur rivals in ooc is less necessary...imo

    The MSU - UM dynamic is different than the tOSU - UM dynamic. For you guys, UM doing well doesn't harm your program; you're the team with the great in-state talent base. For MSU, they're trying to surpass UM in their own state; any thing that props up UM is bad for MSU.

    In that respect, Bama beating UM is good for MSU. A UM W over Bama completely validates Hoke and declares that UM is officially "back". It takes a long time for a traditional power to lose its cred, and it doesn't take much to get it back; MSU wants UM to be suspect for as long as possible.

    For tOSU, as you said, it's great to have a highly ranked rival because it raises the exposure for both programs, etc. That's because tOSU and UM are on the same tier nationally.

    Due to the backlash against that NC game, I doubt 2 SEC teams get back in. You know that they're going to get 1 spot. The other NC spot goes to the highest ranked undefeated squad. I'd argue MSU's schedule, which features 6 top 25 teams (tied with Oklahoma for the most) would set it apart from most competitors, especially if MSU goes 3-0 @UM, @ WI and vs. Nebraska. You've got 2 big names in there and a 3rd (WI), which has played in the last 2 Rose Bowls. Sweep that stretch (Along with beating Boise, ND, tOSU and Iowa) and it'd be hard to deny State a spot in the NC game.

    That said, an undefeated USC, Oregon or OK gets there ahead of MSU.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    The MSU - UM dynamic is different than the tOSU - UM dynamic. For you guys, UM doing well doesn't harm your program; you're the team with the great in-state talent base. For MSU, they're trying to surpass UM in their own state; any thing that props up UM is bad for MSU.

    In that respect, Bama beating UM is good for MSU. A UM W over Bama completely validates Hoke and declares that UM is officially "back". It takes a long time for a traditional power to lose its cred, and it doesn't take much to get it back; MSU wants UM to be suspect for as long as possible.

    For tOSU, as you said, it's great to have a highly ranked rival because it raises the exposure for both programs, etc. That's because tOSU and UM are on the same tier nationally.

    Due to the backlash against that NC game, I doubt 2 SEC teams get back in. You know that they're going to get 1 spot. The other NC spot goes to the highest ranked undefeated squad. I'd argue MSU's schedule, which features 6 top 25 teams (tied with Oklahoma for the most) would set it apart from most competitors, especially if MSU goes 3-0 @UM, @ WI and vs. Nebraska. You've got 2 big names in there and a 3rd (WI), which has played in the last 2 Rose Bowls. Sweep that stretch (Along with beating Boise, ND, tOSU and Iowa) and it'd be hard to deny State a spot in the NC game.

    That said, an undefeated USC, Oregon or OK gets there ahead of MSU.

    i forgot about the recruiting (especially in state)....

    i understand now and do agree!

    a2brutus

  • a2brutus said...

    ohhh kayyy...

    re: osu playing weak opp's cuz we suck???? not sure i understand how oregon, lsu, fla, tex, miami, and ark can be considered "weak" opp's...when we played them, oregon won the pac 10, lsu won the sec, tex was very good, miami was theee team and ark was runnerup in the sec...

    The weak part I don't think I conveyed how I wanted to. I was writing at work, got distracted by...work, and then came back and finished the post.

    I think the B1G hurt itself by sending 2 teams to BCS games every year. Short term there was $$ to be made, but I think the long term affects are starting to show up. Now the B1G is seen as weak because it goes 2-5 in bowl games every year. Public perception doesn't care that the B1G #3 team is playing the B12 #2 team, or that the B1G #4 team is playing the SEC #2 team. The matchups have been far from favorable, and on top of that the B1G team usually has to travel to the backyard of its bowl opponent. Had the B1G only sent 1 team to a BCS bowl the matchups might have been a little more favorable or at least even.

    So, now the B1G is seen as not as strong as it was in the 90's and early 00's. Kids are paying attention to all this and watching ESPN and they've been hearing since 6th grade that the SEC is THE CONFERENCE to be in. Right now the only thing the B1G has any power with is the fanbase is massive, but we need to start winning.

    The part about weak opponents was a jab at um going to the Sugar Bowl last year. No effing reason the guy handing over the trophy should talk about how proud he is of his alum and give a 'go blue'.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Now knowing what 1995 is like all over again! Thank you 247 technology!!

    InTenSity

  • RPMadMSU said...

    You wrote all that without a capital letter. I think that may be some sort of record.

    I gave up trying after the first paragraph.

    Edit: On further review, you capitalized 1 word. So you don't even get points for being consistant.

    didnt know we were getting graded here, professor

    a2brutus

  • InTenSity said...

    The weak part I don't think I conveyed how I wanted to. I was writing at work, got distracted by...work, and then came back and finished the post.

    I think the B1G hurt itself by sending 2 teams to BCS games every year. Short term there was $$ to be made, but I think the long term affects are starting to show up. Now the B1G is seen as weak because it goes 2-5 in bowl games every year. Public perception doesn't care that the B1G #3 team is playing the B12 #2 team, or that the B1G #4 team is playing the SEC #2 team. The matchups have been far from favorable, and on top of that the B1G team usually has to travel to the backyard of its bowl opponent. Had the B1G only sent 1 team to a BCS bowl the matchups might have been a little more favorable or at least even.

    So, now the B1G is seen as not as strong as it was in the 90's and early 00's. Kids are paying attention to all this and watching ESPN and they've been hearing since 6th grade that the SEC is THE CONFERENCE to be in. Right now the only thing the B1G has any power with is the fanbase is massive, but we need to start winning.

    The part about weak opponents was a jab at um going to the Sugar Bowl last year. No effing reason the guy handing over the trophy should talk about how proud he is of his alum and give a 'go blue'.

    totally agree with matchups! every yr i scratch my head and think, oh shit, gonna be a rough bowl season for B1G...

    and playing lsu in the sugar bowl was a friggin home game for them...not to mention when usc plays in pasadena or miami in the orange bowl...

    sec is tough, but its cyclical...they are fast becoming a conf. of 2 teams (bama and lsu) fla has dropped, georgia is solid but not great, auburn is good every 10 yrs or so, what happened to ten,?????

    with the addition of neb. and the ccg, i think the B1G will be a very strong conf. in the next couple yrs...

    osu and um had monster recruiting classes this and last yr, msu and whisky have jumped into the B1G elite and expect to play for the title every yr (not just once in awhile), and iowa, psu and nebraska will challenge often...

    gonna be alot a good games and fun weekends in the midwest, for sure!

    a2brutus

  • a2brutus said...

    totally agree with matchups! every yr i scratch my head and think, oh shit, gonna be a rough bowl season for B1G...

    and playing lsu in the sugar bowl was a friggin home game for them...not to mention when usc plays in pasadena or miami in the orange bowl...

    sec is tough, but its cyclical...they are fast becoming a conf. of 2 teams (bama and lsu) fla has dropped, georgia is solid but not great, auburn is good every 10 yrs or so, what happened to ten,?????

    with the addition of neb. and the ccg, i think the B1G will be a very strong conf. in the next couple yrs...

    osu and um had monster recruiting classes this and last yr, msu and whisky have jumped into the B1G elite and expect to play for the title every yr (not just once in awhile), and iowa, psu and nebraska will challenge often...

    gonna be alot a good games and fun weekends in the midwest, for sure!

    I'm really hoping that if they rotate the new championship game (national), that they bring it to the midwest every 4 years or so, with Detroit and Indy being good places to have the games. I really wish they would pick a true neutral site, I know logistically they can't, but like you said, LSU in NO, and Miami in OB isn't a neutral site for those teams. I think B12 is overrated, it just sucks that we will never see these 'elite' teams play in anything colder than 60 degrees, for the most part.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Now knowing what 1995 is like all over again! Thank you 247 technology!!

    InTenSity

  • InTenSity said...

    I'm really hoping that if they rotate the new championship game (national), that they bring it to the midwest every 4 years or so, with Detroit and Indy being good places to have the games. I really wish they would pick a true neutral site, I know logistically they can't, but like you said, LSU in NO, and Miami in OB isn't a neutral site for those teams. I think B12 is overrated, it just sucks that we will never see these 'elite' teams play in anything colder than 60 degrees, for the most part.

    they could put the title game in hawaii, talk about neutral!

    and i doubt we would have to worry about the univ. of hawaii getting to the title game...

    a2brutus