Online Now 2863

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2265
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2939
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

MSU's 12 for '12 - No. 10 WR/CB Tony Lippett

  • http://michiganstate.247sports.com/Article/Michigan-State-Footballs-12-For-12-No-10-81260

    Spartan Tailgate continues its countdown of the 12 most important players for Michigan State in 2012 with two-way contributor Tony Lippett.

    This post was edited by Dan Kilbridge on 7/18/2012 at 11:29 AM

    signature image

    Follow me on twitter @MSUDanK

    Dan Kilbridge

  • Not sure I necessarily agree with this one. Lippett has star potential, but so many of the wr do that if he doesn't step up, someone else will.

    wingfanjim

  • Yeah not sure if you can put any single one of the WRs as "most important", and if you were to then i'd put Fowler or Arnett over Lippett because they have more experience.

    With so many WRs, a few are bound to step up. I don't really think it matters which ones do.

    Macks

  • Agree that lippett could be huge for this team and is a great option to have at WR. But also agree it's hard to say any of the many options at WR are most important except for Fowler. I think State needs Fowler to stay healthy, he has already shown he is a playmaker with good speed and size and would be a reliable target and potentially a go to reciever if he stays healthy

    Lockwood09

  • Fowler may pop up at a later date, but I stand by Lippett's importance based on experience at the position. MSU needs early production from guys like him and while Mumphery, Sims Jr., Arnett, Burbridge and several others are intriguing options, I think the play of the Spartans' top two wideouts entering the year will be really big. The fact that he could play CB if needed makes him even more valuable.

    signature image

    Follow me on twitter @MSUDanK

    Dan Kilbridge

  • This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Jlai6709

  • I think it's kind of foolish to think that MSU can survive or thrive on receiver by committee. There will be a depth chart and State needs guys to step up and emerge as the best option at the X, Y, Z, or what have you. You don't want a revolving door at one or more of those spots. The passing game is about rhythm, timing, trust, and communication. You really want Maxwell to have his main crew who he has all year, barring injuries. Just because State has lots of green talent doesn't mean we don't want a 'go to guy' to emerge. Lippet may or may not be that guy, but if State has 5 plus guys getting lots of reps in games this fall that means no true first stringers have separated themselves.

    COgruff

  • COgruff said...

    I think it's kind of foolish to think that MSU can survive or thrive on receiver by committee. There will be a depth chart and State needs guys to step up and emerge as the best option at the X, Y, Z, or what have you. You don't want a revolving door at one or more of those spots. The passing game is about rhythm, timing, trust, and communication. You really want Maxwell to have his main crew who he has all year, barring injuries. Just because State has lots of green talent doesn't mean we don't want a 'go to guy' to emerge. Lippet may or may not be that guy, but if State has 5 plus guys getting lots of reps in games this fall that means no true first stringers have separated themselves.

    I think there's a difference between "receiver by committee" and acknowledging that the pecking order will be established in early game play. We know there will be 3-4 WRs getting the bulk of the snaps, we just don't know which ones yet.

    Macks

  • COgruff said...

    I think it's kind of foolish to think that MSU can survive or thrive on receiver by committee. There will be a depth chart and State needs guys to step up and emerge as the best option at the X, Y, Z, or what have you. You don't want a revolving door at one or more of those spots. The passing game is about rhythm, timing, trust, and communication. You really want Maxwell to have his main crew who he has all year, barring injuries. Just because State has lots of green talent doesn't mean we don't want a 'go to guy' to emerge. Lippet may or may not be that guy, but if State has 5 plus guys getting lots of reps in games this fall that means no true first stringers have separated themselves.

    I somewhat disagree, depending on what each WR is used for. You can put a lot of pressure on an opposing secondary by running fresh receivers into the game to run longer routes. I wouldn't be surprised if the top 5 WRs for MSU this year come close to what Cunningham-Martin and Nichol did last year (2435 yards, 20 TDs).

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Exactly macks right now it's nice to have safety in numbers, knowing there are a lot of options with a lot of upside. Can only hope the best options begin to seperate themselves in fall camp and can begin to click with maxwell

    Lockwood09

  • Dan Kilbridge said...

    Fowler may pop up at a later date, but I stand by Lippett's importance based on experience at the position. MSU needs early production from guys like him and while Mumphery, Sims Jr., Arnett, Burbridge and several others are intriguing options, I think the play of the Spartans' top two wideouts entering the year will be really big. The fact that he could play CB if needed makes him even more valuable.

    Fair enough. Still don't know if I agree, but I can see your logic.

    I know you still have nine more guys to go, but the ten guys I would have listed ahead of Lippett not including Jackson and Lewis are (in no order):

    A.R. White- can he command double teams and move the pile at least somewhat like Worthy did?

    Dion Sims- can he stay healthy and be the safety valve a rookie QB needs at TE?

    Dan France- can he improve on last year and keep Maxwell's blindside clear?

    Niko Palezeti- can he replace the battering ram that was Anderson?

    Andrew Maxwell- can he manage the game and limit mistakes so the defense and running game can win the game?

    Nick Hill- can he carry an increased work load as a backup with Caper's shaky health while being an effective return man?

    Fou Fonoti- last year he was thrown to the wolves and held his own. Can he excel as a senior?

    Marcus Rush- had a solid year but faded a bit at the end of the regular season. Has he built body enough to be more effective late in the year? His doing that will be needed with all the attention Gholston will get.

    Denicos Allen- a great year last year, but a bit one dimensional by his own words. Can he improve his coverage skills to be a more complete linebacker so Narduzzi can more effectively mask his blitz packages?

    Derek Hoebing- MSU is an offense built on a lot of two TE sets without two reliable TEs. Can Hoebing step up and fill that role or will we require a true freshman to keep us from a fundamental shift in our offensive scheme?

    Just my thoughts.

    wingfanjim

  • This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Jlai6709

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I somewhat disagree, depending on what each WR is used for. You can put a lot of pressure on an opposing secondary by running fresh receivers into the game to run longer routes. I wouldn't be surprised if the top 5 WRs for MSU this year come close to what Cunningham-Martin and Nichol did last year (2435 yards, 20 TDs).

    Exactly. With so many young and fast receivers in the stable I would be running the opposing cornerbacks on a streak route every friggin down till they are puking.

    signature image signature image signature image

    jjspartan

  • Macks said...

    Yeah not sure if you can put any single one of the WRs as "most important", and if you were to then i'd put Fowler or Arnett over Lippett because they have more experience.

    With so many WRs, a few are bound to step up. I don't really think it matters which ones do.

    Agree...it's the nice part of having some talented depth at the WR position.

    The moment is eternal

    Desert Green

  • This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Jack Ebling

  • This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Macks