-
Dan Kilbridge ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
5881 votes total - (6748)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Dan Kilbridge ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
5881 votes total - (6748)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
COgruff said...
I think it's kind of foolish to think that MSU can survive or thrive on receiver by committee. There will be a depth chart and State needs guys to step up and emerge as the best option at the X, Y, Z, or what have you. You don't want a revolving door at one or more of those spots. The passing game is about rhythm, timing, trust, and communication. You really want Maxwell to have his main crew who he has all year, barring injuries. Just because State has lots of green talent doesn't mean we don't want a 'go to guy' to emerge. Lippet may or may not be that guy, but if State has 5 plus guys getting lots of reps in games this fall that means no true first stringers have separated themselves.
-
COgruff said...
I think it's kind of foolish to think that MSU can survive or thrive on receiver by committee. There will be a depth chart and State needs guys to step up and emerge as the best option at the X, Y, Z, or what have you. You don't want a revolving door at one or more of those spots. The passing game is about rhythm, timing, trust, and communication. You really want Maxwell to have his main crew who he has all year, barring injuries. Just because State has lots of green talent doesn't mean we don't want a 'go to guy' to emerge. Lippet may or may not be that guy, but if State has 5 plus guys getting lots of reps in games this fall that means no true first stringers have separated themselves.
Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.
SpartanRocky
- 5 stars Rating: 90
17255 votes total - Andrew Bell
- (22904)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Dan Kilbridge said...
Fowler may pop up at a later date, but I stand by Lippett's importance based on experience at the position. MSU needs early production from guys like him and while Mumphery, Sims Jr., Arnett, Burbridge and several others are intriguing options, I think the play of the Spartans' top two wideouts entering the year will be really big. The fact that he could play CB if needed makes him even more valuable.
- This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
SpartanRocky said...
I somewhat disagree, depending on what each WR is used for. You can put a lot of pressure on an opposing secondary by running fresh receivers into the game to run longer routes. I wouldn't be surprised if the top 5 WRs for MSU this year come close to what Cunningham-Martin and Nichol did last year (2435 yards, 20 TDs).
-
Macks said...
Yeah not sure if you can put any single one of the WRs as "most important", and if you were to then i'd put Fowler or Arnett over Lippett because they have more experience.
With so many WRs, a few are bound to step up. I don't really think it matters which ones do.
The moment is eternal
Desert Green ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1576 votes total - (4887)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
Jack Ebling
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1232 votes total - Jack Ebling
- (1411)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of SpartanTailgate or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial




MSU's 12 for '12 - No. 10 WR/CB Tony Lippett