Online Now 2863

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2283
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2953
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Maybe Kentucky isn't actually cheating...

  • I would not root for MSU if they cheated in the manner that KY is with Calicheater.

    Posting member of tRCMB since 1997. It is ALWAYS a great day to be a Spartan!!!!

    Raytooth Morgan

  • I'd be interested to see how many people, if we started recruiting like Cal does and won a couple NC's with one and dones, would stick to their "I'm ashamed by the way we're conducting ourselves, yes these NC's are nice, but I'm embarrassed by how we're doing it and want more Suton like players I can watch develop" viewpoints. I'm calling BS, and whether right or wrong I think too many people would be blinded by the winning to actually step back and question whether we were doing it the right way. I'm not saying the way Cal does it is the best way to win or better then the way Izzo does it, just saying that if Izzo was recruiting how Cal does and winning, nobody would actually care.

    It's easy to say oh I'd do this and that, but don't most of us want Jabari Parker, and Jahlil Okafor the next year? Aren't they from the same Chicago cesspool as Anthony Davis where you don't get anybody without a few dollars, as alleged on tRCMB? I know I'll probably get negged to hell for this, but I think most fanbases will always remain blissfully ignorant IF anything is going on at their school (and I still haven't seen anything tangible to prove it's going on at KU) and I think we would all do the same.

    This post was edited by Chilly on 4/1/2012 at 11:28 AM

    signature image

    Chilly

  • Johnny2x2x said...

    How can it not be some kind of violation for WWW to even commnicate just once with a potantial recruit, he's basically an agent? Just read up on him a little, this is the exact type of guy that should not be anywhere near College Basketball in any way. He's got roots going back 20 years, how could the NCAA let him hang around a porgram like Kentucky? I mean it's just preposterous!!! Worse than Ed Martin.

    Well, what do you think WWW knows? About Jordan. Gambling. Donahue. Etc, etc, etc. And how many contracts do you think he made happen? How many lucrative contacts did he make? How much money has he brought a handful of super wealthy power brokers? WWW is "made." Ed Martin would simply be one of his many, many street agents. Which he likely was. Remember, WWW has had pistons season tix for years.

    mentalstate

  • I don't think Cal's cheating right now. He's just a mercenary like the kids he recruits. He cares nothing about developing relationships with these kids and helping them grow as men. All he gives a fuck about is winning.

    Just reason number 5 million why we have the best coach in the game. I'd much rather see MSU win with a group of upperclassmen. Kids that know toil and sacrifice. When it's all said and done the journey is really the reward. I feel a lot better about where Austin Thornton started from and where he ended up after 5 years than a kid only in school because of a bullshit rule.

    signature image

    I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war.

    GhettoHeisman

  • Chilly said...

    I'd be interested to see how many people, if we started recruiting like Cal does and won a couple NC's with one and dones, would stick to their "I'm ashamed by the way we're conducting ourselves, yes these NC's are nice, but I'm embarrassed by how we're doing it and want more Suton like players I can watch develop" viewpoints. I'm calling BS, and whether right or wrong I think too many people would be blinded by the winning to actually step back and question whether we were doing it the right way. I'm not saying the way Cal does it is the best way to win or better then the way Izzo does it, just saying that if Izzo was recruiting how Cal does and winning, nobody would actually care.

    It's easy to say oh I'd do this and that, but don't most of us want Jabari Parker, and Jahlil Okafor the next year? Aren't they from the same Chicago cesspool as Anthony Davis where you don't get anybody without a few dollars, as alleged on tRCMB? I know I'll probably get negged to hell for this, but I think most fanbases will always remain blissfully ignorant IF anything is going on at their school (and I still haven't seen anything tangible to prove it's going on at KU) and I think we would all do the same.

    Well, the major flaw in your argument is that Izzo already went that route and got burned and decided to cut back on it. It was called the Zebo era...

    And if you haven't seen anything regarding uk, you haven't been paying much attention.

    mentalstate

  • Chilly said...

    I'd be interested to see how many people, if we started recruiting like Cal does and won a couple NC's with one and dones, would stick to their "I'm ashamed by the way we're conducting ourselves, yes these NC's are nice, but I'm embarrassed by how we're doing it and want more Suton like players I can watch develop" viewpoints. I'm calling BS, and whether right or wrong I think too many people would be blinded by the winning to actually step back and question whether we were doing it the right way. I'm not saying the way Cal does it is the best way to win or better then the way Izzo does it, just saying that if Izzo was recruiting how Cal does and winning, nobody would actually care.

    It's easy to say oh I'd do this and that, but don't most of us want Jabari Parker, and Jahlil Okafor the next year? Aren't they from the same Chicago cesspool as Anthony Davis where you don't get anybody without a few dollars, as alleged on tRCMB? I know I'll probably get negged to hell for this, but I think most fanbases will always remain blissfully ignorant IF anything is going on at their school (and I still haven't seen anything tangible to prove it's going on at KU) and I think we would all do the same.

    I tend to agree with this.

    I think Cal is a total shit bag, but I also don't think he's violating any rules. I think the rules just provide shitty incentives for there to be a system that promotes all the warm fuzzies that our fan base apparently loves more than winning National Titles.

    My question to the folks that think he's definitively cheating, as in straight up breaking rules, is there any sort of evidence or rule scheme that would convince you he wasn't cheating to get that talent?

    Frankly, all the "Kentucky is ruining college bball, etc." talk just sounds like sour grapes because of the shit load of talent Cal has and how good Kentucky has been this year.

    I think the hate is misdirected and as such less likely to lead to any meaningful changes.

    JMCSpartan08

  • mentalstate said...

    Well, the major flaw in your argument is that Izzo already went that route and got burned and decided to cut back on it. It was called the Zebo era...

    And if you haven't seen anything regarding uk, you haven't been paying much attention.

    I've been paying attention to recruiting, and know that he's trying to go that route again in 2014 with the recruitment of 4 potential top 10 players.

    Besides, that wasn't the point. It wasn't a question of whether or not Izzo SHOULD be doing that, it was a question of if he WAS doing that, would everybody stick to their guns and be disappointed like they claim they would? Are people really going to be disappointed if we were to land Parker, and follow it up next year with Okafor, TJ, Lyle, Alexander, and Harris, even if we only got to see all of these guys for one year apiece? I doubt it.

    This post was edited by Chilly on 4/1/2012 at 11:49 AM

    signature image

    Chilly

  • JMCSpartan08 said...

    I think Cal is a total shit bag, but I also don't think he's violating any rules. I think the rules just provide shitty incentives for there to be a system that promotes all the warm fuzzies that our fan base apparently loves more than winning National Titles.

    We actually get to have our cake and eat it too. We get the warm and fuzzies along with a better system. Last I checked, Izzo still has a better resume than Cal. And if Cal wins the title tomorrow, he will only be tied with Izzo in that department.

    "RCMB: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainry." - some dude from MgoBlog

    JEK

  • Does Cal have to cheat anymore? I don't know... Look at his resume...

    2 lotteries in 2011 (2 first rounders total, 4 drafted)
    3 lotteries in 2010, including the #1 overall (5 first rounders and 5 drafted total)
    1 lottery in 2009 (1 first rounder, 2 drafted)
    1 lottery in 2008, the #1 overall pick (3 drafted total)

    He's almost certainly going to have the #1 overall pick this year and probably 2-3 more guys in the lottery (MKG, Jones and Teague all look like first rounders)

    If those four go pro and make the 1st round, that would be:

    13 first round picks in 5 years, including 3 #1 overall picks.
    Probably about 20 players drafted to the NBA. Again, that's in 5 frickin years.

    If he wins the title, why on Earth would any kid with NBA aspirations choose a school like MSU, Duke, Arizona, etc... ANYWHERE else really.... when they can go to Cal, compete for the national title AND get millions of dollars in just 1-2 years?

    Izzo said it best a few weeks ago. Kids have changed. Social media has turned high school kids into rockstars before they're 18 years old. Remember when Lebron and Oden were getting hype? They were like the only two I can remember. I didn't even know who Durant was until he came out draining threes against MSU back in 07. We're seeing more and more transfers from guys who used to play 4-5 years and accept 12-15 minutes per game as their role. Everyone's a star, everyone's the best...

    It all started when Cal cheated to get Rose 5 years ago and it has snowballed from there. I don't know if he cheats anymore, but he sure as fuck doesn't have to these days.

    "Tonight, we show the world what this program is made of!" -- Brian Ellerbe on Mar 4, 2000, the night of scUM's 51-point loss to MSU.

    m00kie40

  • JMCSpartan08 said...

    I tend to agree with this.

    I think Cal is a total shit bag, but I also don't think he's violating any rules. I think the rules just provide shitty incentives for there to be a system that promotes all the warm fuzzies that our fan base apparently loves more than winning National Titles.

    My question to the folks that think he's definitively cheating, as in straight up breaking rules, is there any sort of evidence or rule scheme that would convince you he wasn't cheating to get that talent?

    Frankly, all the "Kentucky is ruining college bball, etc." talk just sounds like sour grapes because of the shit load of talent Cal has and how good Kentucky has been this year.

    I think the hate is misdirected and as such less likely to lead to any meaningful changes.

    Yep. I wonder if there would even be threads on Kentucky ruining college basketball if they were 13-17 each year. People just primarily hate on them because they win. They fall on the "they definitely cheat" bandwagon as their reason when frankly there just isn't a whole lot of proof. The NCAA took a Heisman Trophy away from a dude and stripped a national title in football. If something is dug up, they'll look into it. But as of right now, enjoy the basketball. Jesus.. this is a good team... maybe one of the best in the last 20 years along with the Florida repeat team and Duke in 01.

    What would people have the NCAA do? The one and done rule isn't going away. If anything it'll be bumped up to two years, in which case Anthony Davis would be tea bagging people ten-fold next year. I can't jump on to the "get rid of the rule and let them go straight to the pros" argument. Even a year of college is much better for these kids than being in the NBA at 18. It makes the quality of play better as well in the college game.

    Lunchables

  • Chilly said...

    I'd be interested to see how many people, if we started recruiting like Cal does and won a couple NC's with one and dones, would stick to their "I'm ashamed by the way we're conducting ourselves, yes these NC's are nice, but I'm embarrassed by how we're doing it and want more Suton like players I can watch develop" viewpoints. I'm calling BS, and whether right or wrong I think too many people would be blinded by the winning to actually step back and question whether we were doing it the right way. I'm not saying the way Cal does it is the best way to win or better then the way Izzo does it, just saying that if Izzo was recruiting how Cal does and winning, nobody would actually care.

    It's easy to say oh I'd do this and that, but don't most of us want Jabari Parker, and Jahlil Okafor the next year? Aren't they from the same Chicago cesspool as Anthony Davis where you don't get anybody without a few dollars, as alleged on tRCMB? I know I'll probably get negged to hell for this, but I think most fanbases will always remain blissfully ignorant IF anything is going on at their school (and I still haven't seen anything tangible to prove it's going on at KU) and I think we would all do the same.

    I think that's true. Nobody starts off with the notion of "hey, let's sell our soul and win a national championship." Success tends to make a fanbase turn a blind-eye to the reality of what's going on, whether that's Kentucky basketball, Barry Bonds, or the Fab Five. People like to win, they look at the program and define it as part of themselves, and look to defend it even if the face of evidence. Heck, there are still some on this board who look at the issues of Perles and want to defend him and what his once well-intentioned program had become. I'm not sure we're any different although we like to think our current coaches (Izzo and Dantonio) are above that level. I think they are, but I also admit I can be a bit blind to my alma mater and try to check that instinct.

    Selling your soul is an incremental process and I'm sure there are a few Kentucky fans who realized that was happening when Calipari was brought in. Fanbases do want to remain ignorant as long as the program wins. But that's where you need strong leadership and an institution that retains control over athletics. I don't think the University of Kentucky has much control over that basketball program at this point, and you combine that with a fanbase drunk on winning and you've got a situation where someone willing to skirt the ethical guidelines can do so. You can't depend on the fans and alumni of an institution to be the brakes in these instances........

    "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." --Gandhi

    Heathens 87

  • Chilly said...

    I'd be interested to see how many people, if we started recruiting like Cal does and won a couple NC's with one and dones, would stick to their "I'm ashamed by the way we're conducting ourselves, yes these NC's are nice, but I'm embarrassed by how we're doing it and want more Suton like players I can watch develop" viewpoints. I'm calling BS, and whether right or wrong I think too many people would be blinded by the winning to actually step back and question whether we were doing it the right way. I'm not saying the way Cal does it is the best way to win or better then the way Izzo does it, just saying that if Izzo was recruiting how Cal does and winning, nobody would actually care.

    It's easy to say oh I'd do this and that, but don't most of us want Jabari Parker, and Jahlil Okafor the next year? Aren't they from the same Chicago cesspool as Anthony Davis where you don't get anybody without a few dollars, as alleged on tRCMB? I know I'll probably get negged to hell for this, but I think most fanbases will always remain blissfully ignorant IF anything is going on at their school (and I still haven't seen anything tangible to prove it's going on at KU) and I think we would all do the same.

    I'd think more people might be ashamed if something like that turned up at MSU, if only because of the environment. Meaning, people have little else in Kentucky sportswise other than Kentucky basketball. Sort of like Alabama football. Since that's the only thing they have going on, they will give anything for wins. Meanwhile, in Michigan and at MSU we have other programs/teams, so we aren't cashing in our firstborn child for a championship.

    I could be wrong...just a hypothesis. I just see more desperation in those fanbases.

    signature image

    PolskaSpartan

  • Bender said...

    Isn't there an exception if a player goes pro? Otherwise Ky is going to lose all of their schollies sometime soon.

    There's not an exception. The player just has to make appropriate progress toward a degree based on the time he is there.

    UConn will pay the price for that next year.

    “Kansas may wind up number one in these polls, but that would be so unfair to Texas...” -- Len Elmore, 2/13/11

    Bob in Houston

  • I wish Tom Izzo would start recruiting dirty again, like when we got Mateen and Mo Pete. Clearly cheated to get those guys or they would end up at Michigan.

    - Steely Nucky

    This post was edited by ass dan on 4/1/2012 at 12:28 PM

    ass dan