Online Now 3070

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2264
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2951
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Position by Position Improvement/Step Back From Last year

  • Spartan8Ball said...

    I've seen Maxwell play numerous times at Midland. I know what he capable of. Sunshine blowhards are still emotionally attached to Cousins. News flash, Maxwell has better physical talent. Cousins said it this offseason.

    Yeah because playing at Midland is the same as playing at MSU

    TPain151807

  • Spartan8Ball said...

    I've seen Maxwell play numerous times at Midland. I know what he capable of. Sunshine blowhards are still emotionally attached to Cousins. News flash, Maxwell has better physical talent. Cousins said it this offseason.

    lol

    "Losing Benenoch is a mortal blow from which this program can't recover"-T-Pain

    Rogue Leader

  • Chitown_Badger said...

    Rocky...are you on staff, or just a football nut? You're very versed in not only your team but others as well.

    Quasi-staff. I do the in-depth football previews for the site and was able to get a press pass for a couple of games last year. I did a "running journal" for the games I was in the press box for, similar to what Bill Simmons does for the NBA draft and such. Not sure what I'm doing this season, other than the previews.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Quasi-staff. I do the in-depth football previews for the site and was able to get a press pass for a couple of games last year. I did a "running journal" for the games I was in the press box for, similar to what Bill Simmons does for the NBA draft and such. Not sure what I'm doing this season, other than the previews.

    That's sounds awesome. Nice job.

    Chitown_Badger

  • T-Pain said...

    Yeah because playing at Midland is the same as playing at MSU

    Do you not get what "Capable of" means?

    His play this fall will be gratifying. I'm taking a list and checking it twice of all the guys that hate on Maxwell. It's so far fetched that anybody can be better than Cousins.

    This post was edited by Spartan8Ball on 5/31/2012 at 5:36 PM

    signature image

    Spartan8Ball

  • Spartan8Ball said...

    Do you not get what "Capable of" means?

    His play this fall will be gratifying. I'm taking a list and checking it twice of all the guys that hate on Maxwell.

    My comment didn't suggest anything to say I was hating on Maxwell

    TPain151807

  • Chitown_Badger said...

    Rocky...are you on staff, or just a football nut? You're very versed in not only your team but others as well.

    If he were on staff, you wouldn't have been able to read half the posts in this thread.

    Loose Stools

  • Definitely agree with the improvement on the o-line.. especially if you compare early last year to what one might expect early this year. Biigggg difference.. oh... and you forgot to mention prior 4 star C-G Nate Klatt in the playing group who would have started last year were it not for injury. Also, realy would like to see Reynolds in at OG next to France/Burkland...talk about a mauling left side of the line that would be! Geeesssh! Don't know what to make of Treadwell, except now that they moved him over to O line last year State could really have used him to move in from a year at DT this year. Oh well.

    If you had to look at all the units of an offense and were told you could only improve at 1 for the year O line would be it for me. Great o-line can make up for a world of pedestrian or inexperience-related performance at all the other positions. Conversely, you can have all world RBs, WRs, TEs and QB and they won't do squat if you have a poor O-line.

    Unfortunately I believe he O line is pretty much it for improvement this year on the O.

    RB - would have put this in the definite improved column this year because I believe Caper is a realy gifted back with size (recall he was the original starter before being hurt 2 years ago). Much better at seeing the seams and cutting than Baker ever was. Unfortunately, .. I thought his injuries were just tick tack shoulder, ankle kind of stuff and it turns out that he had a concussion.. more than one. That is never a good sign. Each Concussion you get makes it much more likely for another. I really fear that LC might have to hang it up if he gets his bell rung one more time. Without Caper, State really has no #2 for a 1 -2 punch with Bell.. .. not sold on Hill as anything more than a special plays back. Langford and Tompkins will be too inexperienced too as would Ed Davis should he switch from LB.

    TE - have to worry that the staff went out at the last minute and signed a JUCO TE well after signing day. That is a red flag to me about the status of the position. Can't count on Frosh there at all ...too small.. too inexperienced. Even if Sims comes back totally healthy, loses weight, really dedicates himself at the level of his talent, that is only 1TE. Dantonio, if you noticed, really likes to have three to rotate in. Right now, TE#2 is a walk on.

    WR - huge question mark as far as what they MIGHT do. Could be very good. But I'd say the unit takes a step back this year only in the sense at who you are comparing them too. Cunnigham, Martin and Nichol were the best 1, 2, 3 receiver group I believe the Spartans have had in a long long time. This years WR could be quite good...but no way should anyone expect them to be at the level of last year's contingent.

    Fort Wayne Dave

  • Good info Rocky. My memory though was C was Jackson's job until he got injured pre-season. He took it back maybe a little ahead of schedule when Treadwell got banged up. But I think he's going to be a plus playing during his career. Allen will be interesting to watch.

    Also, if Burkland didn't get injured, I'd bet Fonoti takes a red shirt. And Fou seemed to really pick it up as the season went on. I wouldn't be surprised if all three (minus Treadwell) takes a big step this year.

    dagomike

  • Fort Wayne Dave said...

    Definitely agree with the improvement on the o-line.. especially if you compare early last year to what one might expect early this year. Biigggg difference.. oh... and you forgot to mention prior 4 star C-G Nate Klatt in the playing group who would have started last year were it not for injury. Also, realy would like to see Reynolds in at OG next to France/Burkland...talk about a mauling left side of the line that would be! Geeesssh! Don't know what to make of Treadwell, except now that they moved him over to O line last year State could really have used him to move in from a year at DT this year. Oh well.

    A few things.

    1. Doing WAY too much stargazing in regard to Klatt. He was third string last year behind Treadwell and Jackson BEFORE his injury last year so I don't know where you got the notion that he was going to start last year. Currently, he's listed as the 3rd string center behing Jackson and Ruhland. Klatt, for whatever reason has just not put it together and has essentially been passed on the depth chart at both the center and guard positions. He's going to end up as one of those "program guys" who provides quality depth but little more unless something drastic changes with him.

    2. Treadwell is our starting LG going into the fall so it shouldn't be hard to figure out what to make of him.

    3. Reynolds is at DT and is likely to stay at DT from now on so that's sort of a non-starter.

    wingfanjim

  • I think this offensive line will be dramatically better. There was no continuity and a ton of ????? last year. This year there are established players battling for positions. Got to believe Fonoti, Jackson, Treadwell, Burkland , France all make huge strides.

    None of them played O-line at this level prior to last year. 4* Klatt, Conway, not to mention Allen are competing. I think this will be the most improved aspect of the team this year and is being under-rated.

    O lines need practice time. There was no practice time for the O-Line last year and ...how many years in a row did State have little stability or depth of replacements. I think this O-Line will be near the top of the conference this year. I do not see any comparison to this O-Line with any of Coach D's previous O-lines. He has developed talent, depth, size and ability. The athleticism and talent of the line outweighs all the previous lines.....did I mention continuity?

    If....we can find a second tight end, Mills, Drone.... to go with Sims, watch out.

    This post was edited by northandwells on 5/31/2012 at 9:11 PM

    northandwells

  • wingfanjim said...

    QB- This is another area where it has to be analyzed at different levels. From a physical tools perspective, Maxwell is superior to Cousins in every way. He's bigger, faster, and has a stronger arm. Is he as accurate? We shall see. How is his decision making? We shall see. I don't think understanding of the offense will be an issue as he is in year four with the program.

    The one big issue is leadership. Cousins was a natural leader. I know for some, replacing that leadership is their biggest worry in regards to Maxwell and the team as a whole. Well I'm here to report that Maxwell won't be the leader Cousins was. Nor should he try to because he doesn't have to be. Good leadership from the QB position comes in many forms. Sometimes it is the polished speaker who is active in the communication like Cousins. Sometimes it is the unassuming, lunch pail, blue collar type guy like Hoyer. Sometimes it is the fiery, sacrifice my body for the team, gunslinger like Stanton. All three were different and all three were effective. Maxwell doesn't have to be Cousins. He just had to be himself.

    I see the QB as a slight downgrade with a potential for a push wife the offense should be able to lean more on the running game.

    Overall- Thanks to an improved running game, I think this offense ends up being more effective this year than last.

    +1 to you sir.

    mydogsparty

  • northandwells said...

    I think this offensive line will be dramatically better.

    Dramatically better? We'll see. Here's my criteria for "dramatically better": I wanna see Bell ripping off 5-7 yards-a-carry on first downs.

    If that can happen - I'll go on record as saying that MSU WILL GO TO THE ROSE BOWL. Barring injuries to key players, (Maxwell must stay healthy for example).

    So my suggestion to Spartan fans: If during the Boise State game, you see the OL physically dominating play, and Bell chewing up yards and clock, go ahead and book your tickets to Pasadena.

    Dicks Fake Eye20793

  • Dick's Fake Eye said...

    Dramatically better? We'll see. Here's my criteria for "dramatically better": I wanna see Bell ripping off 5-7 yards-a-carry on first downs.

    If that can happen - I'll go on record as saying that MSU WILL GO TO THE ROSE BOWL. Barring injuries to key players, (Maxwell must stay healthy for example).

    So my suggestion to Spartan fans: If during the Boise State game, you see the OL physically dominating play, and Bell chewing up yards and clock, go ahead and book your tickets to Pasadena.

    I think the potential is certainly there for the offensive line to be dramatically better. Remember that there were five players who started at some point last year who had never started before and four of those players are currently listed as starters. There is a lot of development that can take place between your first and second year of getting first string reps. Let's look at them individually

    France- last year he did a decent job at LT after being switched to offensive line during 2010 bowl practices. That's not a lot of time to go from backup DT to starting LT. Since then, France had an entire season on offense where he did show improvement, 2011 bowl practice, and 2012 Spring ball to refine his techniques. He still has a few more months to condition his body and work some more. I think you will see him transition from an adequate tackle to an above average one this year. Big step.

    Treadwell- currently penciled in as the starting LG, he too got moved from D late in the game. With a full offseason to work on things, he has the potential to have a big improvement in his game.

    Jackson- started at center during his redshirt freshman year. He played woefully undersized last year at 275, however thanks to great Ohio coaching he was an effective technician for a youngster. With another year with coach Mannie, he's already added 5 lbs of weight as he continues to develop physically and he will continue to refine and improve his technique as well. Another guy who should make a big leap.

    Fonoti- another guy who will probably change physically from 2011. This winter was his first real introduction to Mannie's conditioning program. His body is going to be different because of it. Secondly, this year he will already have an understanding of the playbook from the first snap of fall camp unlike last year where he was learning the offense on the fly. Another potential big development guy.

    Burkland- he will be first guy off the bench at either tackle position. Has starting experience and, as a redshirt sophomore, he's just now entering that phase oh his career where physical, mental, and technical maturity start coming together for an offensive linemen. Rarely do you see truly standout players on the line who are younger. Burkland would be a starter on most big ten teams. The fact that he's a backup is a testament to just how deep we are on the line right now.

    wingfanjim

  • I'm calling it now...MSU Football and it's fans, in the 2012-2013 season will...

    ...have a good time, a real good time.

    signature image

    RPMadMSU

  • Wow Rocky, way to go way too far to say that "The line will be much much better than last year but not quite as good as the elite."

    Probably going from the 6th best line in the conference (last year) to the 2nd or 3rd best this year.

    DONE.

    I don't agree that Foreman's spot will be a down grade. Great Spartan, very good player, but his ceiling was not very high and he was playing EXTREMELY hurt. Obviously another guy matching his accountability and intelligence, not his physical attributes is the issue, but I'm really not concerned.

    Also, freaking GIANT upgrade in overall depth, and experience in the unit, and I really think Jackson is going to be an 'All Timer' level of good. I remember watching the Michigan game with my buddy and singling out Jackson freaking man handling Mike Martin on an inside run, solo, R-Fr vs Senior NFL Prospect.

    This post was edited by Pylon St8ofmind on 6/1/2012 at 7:55 AM

    Marriage is like flying with kids, if the flight had 500 connections, never ended, Ted Striker were your pilot and you ate the fish.

    Pylon St8ofmind

  • wingfanjim said...

    A few things.

    1. Doing WAY too much stargazing in regard to Klatt. He was third string last year behind Treadwell and Jackson BEFORE his injury last year so I don't know where you got the notion that he was going to start last year. Currently, he's listed as the 3rd string center behing Jackson and Ruhland. Klatt, for whatever reason has just not put it together and has essentially been passed on the depth chart at both the center and guard positions. He's going to end up as one of those "program guys" who provides quality depth but little more unless something drastic changes with him.

    2. Treadwell is our starting LG going into the fall so it shouldn't be hard to figure out what to make of him.

    3. Reynolds is at DT and is likely to stay at DT from now on so that's sort of a non-starter.

    1. I confess to not remembering the order things happened last spring. I want to say that it was a 3-way race till Klatt broke his foot, at which point Treadwell/Jackson had the dreaded "OR" next to their names out of spring. I do recall that Jackson was ahead of Treadwell about a week before the opening game, but then he sprained his ankle.

    2. I think the point is that we've only seen Treadwell at C for 2.5 games last year, so it's hard to predict what MSU will be getting out of him at OG.

    3. Reynolds continued to bounce back and forth between the lines this spring. He seems to make plays no matter where they put him; I thought he played a good game vs. UGA last year at DT, and showed some promise on the OL as well. At this point I'd rather see him stick at DT; he provides size and at least some experience on the interior. I think MSU is better situated at OG than DT at this point.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Pylon St8ofmind said...

    Wow Rocky, way to go way too far to say that "The line will be much much better than last year but not quite as good as the elite."

    Probably going from the 6th best line in the conference (last year) to the 2nd or 3rd best this year.

    DONE.

    I don't agree that Foreman's spot will be a down grade. Great Spartan, very good player, but his ceiling was not very high and he was playing EXTREMELY hurt. Obviously another guy matching his accountability and intelligence, not his physical attributes is the issue, but I'm really not concerned.

    Also, freaking GIANT upgrade in overall depth, and experience in the unit, and I really think Jackson is going to be an 'All Timer' level of good. I remember watching the Michigan game with my buddy and singling out Jackson freaking man handling Mike Martin on an inside run, solo, R-Fr vs Senior NFL Prospect.

    I think by now you know that brevity is my sworn enemy lol

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Spartan8Ball said...

    Alot of differences in that comparison. Maxwell is better than Hoyer, and I think Maxwell has more talent around him. Hoyer had to adjust offenses. Maxwell has been in this system for three years.

    someone ban this idiot

    Hoyer has been holding down the #2 job on the NFL's premier franchise for 5 years and yet some kid who has never taken a meaningful snap in a college game is better?

    We've got depth. We've got numbers.

    ninowesco

  • CoachedByDuffy said...

    You'll be surprised Andrew. The starting OL I projected above is how the staff thinks the competition will turn out this Fall. The staff feels that Skyler Burkland is their most talented OL. The staff also feels that Dan France @ LG is a more powerful option than Blake Treadwell. Note : The staff never seriously considered moving Chris McDonald from OG to OT last season. That was all media talk and speculation.

    lol

    when exactly does the staff tell you this?

    me thinks the voices are coming from inside your own head.

    We've got depth. We've got numbers.

    ninowesco

  • wingfanjim said...

    I think the potential is certainly there for the offensive line to be dramatically better. Remember that there were five players who started at some point last year who had never started before and four of those players are currently listed as starters. There is a lot of development that can take place between your first and second year of getting first string reps. Let's look at them individually

    France- last year he did a decent job at LT after being switched to offensive line during 2010 bowl practices. That's not a lot of time to go from backup DT to starting LT. Since then, France had an entire season on offense where he did show improvement, 2011 bowl practice, and 2012 Spring ball to refine his techniques. He still has a few more months to condition his body and work some more. I think you will see him transition from an adequate tackle to an above average one this year. Big step.

    Treadwell- currently penciled in as the starting LG, he too got moved from D late in the game. With a full offseason to work on things, he has the potential to have a big improvement in his game.

    Jackson- started at center during his redshirt freshman year. He played woefully undersized last year at 275, however thanks to great Ohio coaching he was an effective technician for a youngster. With another year with coach Mannie, he's already added 5 lbs of weight as he continues to develop physically and he will continue to refine and improve his technique as well. Another guy who should make a big leap.

    Fonoti- another guy who will probably change physically from 2011. This winter was his first real introduction to Mannie's conditioning program. His body is going to be different because of it. Secondly, this year he will already have an understanding of the playbook from the first snap of fall camp unlike last year where he was learning the offense on the fly. Another potential big development guy.

    Burkland- he will be first guy off the bench at either tackle position. Has starting experience and, as a redshirt sophomore, he's just now entering that phase oh his career where physical, mental, and technical maturity start coming together for an offensive linemen. Rarely do you see truly standout players on the line who are younger. Burkland would be a starter on most big ten teams. The fact that he's a backup is a testament to just how deep we are on the line right now.

    McDonald will probably refine his game a bit and be slightly improved. OL is really a position where the whole is greater (or less) than the sum of the parts. Having 1-2 good OL and 3 mediocre ones will make the whole line look bad. Having 4-5 above average to good OL will make the whole line look great.

    I liken it to the defense; there was no weak player among the starting 11 and as a result the D was stingy.

    Speaking of which . . .

    I think the LB unit this year could really be special. Last season was the first year than MSU had good players at all 3 LB spots. In 2007, you had Jones/Gordon . . . and Kaleb Thornhill. Thornhill had a ton of heart, but he was limited physically. In '08, you had Jones/Gordon and . . . Decker/Allison. I'm of the belief that if Allison could have had a RS, MSU's LB unit would have been pretty solid in '09; kid looked good for a guy playing a position for 1 year. In '09, you had Jones/Gordon and . . . a true FR Chris Norman and converted RB walk-on Brandon Denson. In '10, you had Jones/Gordon/Norman . . . but Norman was hurt at times and Misch played quite a bit.

    Finally, in '11, MSU had Norman progress to the level of Hon. Mention All Big 10, and the 2 new guys ended up 2nd team All Big 10 as sophomores. The key here is Norman again. He had off-season shoulder surgery to correct a problem that had been bothering him since his FR year; We all saw how much better Gholston played after having a lingering shoulder problem corrected. Assuming some natural progression from Bullough/Allen, along with a fully healthy Norman and I think MSU's LB unit ends up being one of the top 10 units in the country.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Dick's Fake Eye said...

    Dramatically better? We'll see. Here's my criteria for "dramatically better": I wanna see Bell ripping off 5-7 yards-a-carry on first downs.

    If that can happen - I'll go on record as saying that MSU WILL GO TO THE ROSE BOWL. Barring injuries to key players, (Maxwell must stay healthy for example).

    So my suggestion to Spartan fans: If during the Boise State game, you see the OL physically dominating play, and Bell chewing up yards and clock, go ahead and book your tickets to Pasadena.

    whoa there buddy

    I like your enthusiasm but running over Boise does not mean we can run over Ohio State and Wisconsin.

    For the record, I think we will run on everybody, just saying that Boise is not a good measuring stick Maybe ND.

    We've got depth. We've got numbers.

    ninowesco

  • wingfanjim said...

    Treadwell- currently penciled in as the starting LG, he too got moved from D late in the game. With a full offseason to work on things, he has the potential to have a big improvement in his game.

    Burkland- he will be first guy off the bench at either tackle position. Has starting experience and, as a redshirt sophomore, he's just now entering that phase oh his career where physical, mental, and technical maturity start coming together for an offensive linemen. Rarely do you see truly standout players on the line who are younger. Burkland would be a starter on most big ten teams. The fact that he's a backup is a testament to just how deep we are on the line right now.

    I think you may be pretty off-base here with these assumptions. Treadwell does not have the OG spot nailed down. The staff had hinted at it, and dufffy brought it up again meaning it is very much alive, that Burkland may be starting at France's position, and France would slide to that OG spot and be the huge mauler we know Reynolds is. That's a uw-sized left side. And that would mean Conway would be the back-up at RT, and if Burkland got hurt, France would likely slide back over and the winner between Klatt & Treadwell would take the OG.

    FWDave, I do not feel the same way at all about the RB position- it is the easiest position by far for a TB to succeed at, especially in a back-up role. Not to mention Hill & Langford both looked pretty good against one heck of a D running behind half lines this spring.

    mentalstate

  • ninowesco said...

    whoa there buddy

    I like your enthusiasm but running over Boise does not mean we can run over Ohio State and Wisconsin.

    For the record, I think we will run on everybody, just saying that Boise is not a good measuring stick Maybe ND.

    One good thing about the schedule is that MSU should have a pretty realistic view of the OL after the first 5 games: Boise, ND and tOSU.

    I'd hope MSU can run on a Boise St. team replacing 4 SR DL. ND running that 3-4 is a pain. tOSU returns 8 or 9 starters off of last year's D, and that D was pretty good. That could end up being the best D MSU sees during the regular season, unless Nebraska takes a couple steps forward.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Thanks Rocky, it's always interesting to see the

    religious fights over how many linemen can fit on the head of a pin.

    Always interesting and actually about football.

    Nίκη για MSU

    Bender