Online Now 2407

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2128
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2784
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Reason #3 on why I'm getting out of education.....

  • Iceman3MSU said...

    What you fail to realize in your post is that most "outsiders" (those not in the teaching profession) only hear (or see) you complaining about having to be accountable. Outsiders don't really care that the accountability standards may not fit or work well in all cases, but do want some level of accountability, just as there are standards held in almost every other profession. You offer no real alternative to evaluating teachers and as such, your message falls on deaf ears as just another teacher complaining about their job. Many outsiders also would love to work the perceived hours that teachers work - summers off and 40 hour or less weeks. Personally, I've never seen a teacher gross up their annual salary to reflect the fact they are essentially unemployed for 2-3 months a year.

    What he (and I) are saying is that we would welcome and do expect accountability standards, just those standards should be created and overseen by others in the profession. I have heard numerous ideas for teacher evaluations, but again, those aspects are not decided within our professional community.

    I love my summers off and am more than willing to take a pay cut to keep it. One thing that does bother me is the idea that the school year will be extended with no EXTRA pay. I wouldn't be able to be a teacher if I didn't have the summer off to refuel.

    El Doctor B

  • I feel sorry for teachers who have to deal with today's punks. I am so tired of 'its the system'. How about, 'its the parents and kids'.

    spartanMF

  • El Doctor B said...

    What he (and I) are saying is that we would welcome and do expect accountability standards, just those standards should be created and overseen by others in the profession. I have heard numerous ideas for teacher evaluations, but again, those aspects are not decided within our professional community.

    I love my summers off and am more than willing to take a pay cut to keep it. One thing that does bother me is the idea that the school year will be extended with no EXTRA pay. I wouldn't be able to be a teacher if I didn't have the summer off to refuel.

    El Doctor B - your responses have been articulate, to the point and rational. I appreciate your commentary. I believe the only point we do differ on is that the other poster's response did not appear to come from someone who wanted a accountability and a solution to the existing system in place. He appeared to be moreso upset that teachers and him/her specifically were being held accountable to standards that don't make a whole lot of sense.

    Iceman3MSU

  • El Doctor B said...

    I think the difference with teachers is that demands on performance are placed on them by outside factors. For instance, a doctor is part of the AMA, run by doctors who make up professional standards, boards, etc. A lawyer is part of the bar association, made up of other attorneys....you get the point. The people who want to judge our job performance as teachers are not educators. Right now a lot of it is coming from the political arena.

    Ding. ding.

    The educational system is driven by politicians and influential organizations which create the "reforms" (most ignoring research and sound advice), mandates and from which they profit.

    The last 9 Secretaries of the Department of education- 8 or nine have no educational experience whatsoever and the other had very little. They are responsible for stimulating innovation, improvements, national standards, etc.

    Most "expert reformers" embraced in the accountability craze have very little experience or success as teachers. Who a doctor with three years of doctoring be allowed to drive reform? Would a solder with 3-5 years of service be allowed to "reform" the system? Would any other profession allow inexperience to manipulate and steer change? Would these people be taken seriously? Yet we permit this in education. T

    his reform we see today does not fix what is broken. It's a shells game. There is no discussion of innovative teaching or learning practices except at the grass roots level. There is no discussion of fixing the funding game- which no longer works in this climate (Proposal A). The deform is top heavy. It's testing heavy- which is ineffective. It's inefficient. It's myopic and is not based on/or ignores educational studies. Until a bona fide discussion takes place- improvements will not take place while the top profits greatly.

    Again. keep this discussion civil.

    signature image

    Spartan by Birth, Spartan by Design; 3rd Generation Alum

    ColnagoSpartan

  • spartanMF said...

    I feel sorry for teachers who have to deal with today's punks. I am so tired of 'its the system'. How about, 'its the parents and kids'.

    We can't change the parents and the kids, though. We can change the system. We should not make a system and then demand that everyone fit into it, rather, we should form a system that incorporates the different needs and goals of those we are serving.

    El Doctor B

  • El Doctor B said...

    We can't change the parents and the kids, though. We can change the system. We should not make a system and then demand that everyone fit into it, rather, we should form a system that incorporates the different needs and goals of those we are serving.

    OK, good luck developing that system for gangsters.

    BTW: 2+2=4. Its been that way for a zillion years. Either study it or don't. Those that don't, no need to come crying about the 'system'.

    spartanMF

  • Iceman3MSU said...

    What you fail to realize in your post is that most "outsiders" (those not in the teaching profession) only hear (or see) you complaining about having to be accountable. Outsiders don't really care that the accountability standards may not fit or work well in all cases, but do want some level of accountability, just as there are standards held in almost every other profession. You offer no real alternative to evaluating teachers and as such, your message falls on deaf ears as just another teacher complaining about their job. Many outsiders also would love to work the perceived hours that teachers work - summers off and 40 hour or less weeks. Personally, I've never seen a teacher gross up their annual salary to reflect the fact they are essentially unemployed for 2-3 months a year.

    No. I realize that. I want accountability. I am accountable and am rated at the top.(I'm a Spartan.) But, there is common sense accountability which produces quality gains. And then there are accountability measures which look good to the uneducated (in educational terms), and then are mandated by politicians who step into a classroom every for years for 5 minutes in search of a photo op. Then tend to never produce quality gains. "Reform" is not was it is then, eh?

    Iceman- I've been watching the "discussions" on teaching on the RCMB and other places for years. If you would like ideas, we teachers have them. Politicians do not return calls or respond to letters. (Afraid of accountability?) I tend not to waste my time anymore trying to "explain" my professional observation/experience to people who really don't want to listen and digest anyways. In a nutshell, 1. standardized testing, charters/vouchers, and accountability aren't the magic pill and will not improve anything. 2. Lessen the effects of poverty. 3. early intervention pre-K education 4. innovate methodologies 5. better professional development for those involved. 6. accountability for students/parents (truancy, low grades)....for starts

    Iceman- Elaborate the 40 hours, summers off perception that you have. What do you do so I can try an make a connection?

    Peace.

    This post was edited by ColnagoSpartan on 4/19/2012 at 2:19 PM

    signature image

    Spartan by Birth, Spartan by Design; 3rd Generation Alum

    ColnagoSpartan

  • Just based on how horrible this thread is and has been from the start, i hope this "educator" didn't attend MSU. Isnt the EDU school like top 10? Maybe our educators in EL need to stop allowing people to get through the system.nerd

    Murdog6

  • Play

    Mr. Deeds - School is for Fools

    Scene from the movie with a Robin Williams look-a-like homeless guy.

    http://www.youtube.com/v/vz-6-MfpsJo

    Izzo Court

  • spartanMF said...

    BTW: 2+2=4. Its been that way for a zillion years. Either study it or don't. Those that don't, no need to come crying about the 'system'.

    If a student with Downs doesn't learn to apply the quadratic equation, is it the fault of the student or teacher?

    Well, neither, El Doctor B, why would you be teaching a child with the mental capacity of a 6 year old the quadratic equation anyway?

    For clarification, a personal story. I recently had two brothers in my class as freshman. They HATED school. They could barely read, did terrible academically, and often got into trouble in and out of school. They lived with their mom, who could not read, did not have a job, nor did she ever have any real gainful employment in her life. At the end of freshman year, they each had about .5 credits to their name. They eventually dropped out after the first quarter of their "sophomore" year.

    One day during the beginning of their second year in high school, a teacher was having trouble with his lawnmower. He brought the lawnmower in for another teacher to look at, that just so happened to be a special education teacher who taught these two boys. He had the brothers take a look at the mower, and after about 45 minutes to an hour, had the lawnmower not only running again but fully functioning.

    Those two boys had a unique skill. That skill could have landed them fully employment. Instead, we insisted on trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. The result is that those two will probably never have a real job or pay taxes. They will probably be arrested multiple times in their lives and be absent parents. We arbitrarily assign a value to certain skills while dismissing others. Why? Well, honestly that system is inherently flawed and unequal. You can't say that, "well, if they just tried harder, they would get it." We value skills that those in power naturally possess through a solid, and frankly, rich upbringing. We devalue the others.

    So, the kid with Downs just needs to try harder, right?

    El Doctor B

  • El Doctor B said...

    If a student with Downs doesn't learn to apply the quadratic equation, is it the fault of the student or teacher?

    Well, neither, El Doctor B, why would you be teaching a child with the mental capacity of a 6 year old the quadratic equation anyway?

    For clarification, a personal story. I recently had two brothers in my class as freshman. They HATED school. They could barely read, did terrible academically, and often got into trouble in and out of school. They lived with their mom, who could not read, did not have a job, nor did she ever have any real gainful employment in her life. At the end of freshman year, they each had about .5 credits to their name. They eventually dropped out after the first quarter of their "sophomore" year.

    One day during the beginning of their second year in high school, a teacher was having trouble with his lawnmower. He brought the lawnmower in for another teacher to look at, that just so happened to be a special education teacher who taught these two boys. He had the brothers take a look at the mower, and after about 45 minutes to an hour, had the lawnmower not only running again but fully functioning.

    Those two boys had a unique skill. That skill could have landed them fully employment. Instead, we insisted on trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. The result is that those two will probably never have a real job or pay taxes. They will probably be arrested multiple times in their lives and be absent parents. We arbitrarily assign a value to certain skills while dismissing others. Why? Well, honestly that system is inherently flawed and unequal. You can't say that, "well, if they just tried harder, they would get it." We value skills that those in power naturally possess through a solid, and frankly, rich upbringing. We devalue the others.

    So, the kid with Downs just needs to try harder, right?

    Are there no prisons?! Are there no workhouses?!

    Kisses,

    Mitt Romney, the GOP and Tea Party

    This post was edited by JMCSpartan08 on 4/19/2012 at 4:00 PM

    JMCSpartan08

  • ColnagoSpartan said...

    No. I realize that. I want accountability. I am accountable and am rated at the top.(I'm a Spartan.) But, there is common sense accountability which produces quality gains. And then there are accountability measures which look good to the uneducated (in educational terms), and then are mandated by politicians who step into a classroom every for years for 5 minutes in search of a photo op. Then tend to never produce quality gains. "Reform" is not was it is then, eh?

    Iceman- I've been watching the "discussions" on teaching on the RCMB and other places for years. If you would like ideas, we teachers have them. Politicians do not return calls or respond to letters. (Afraid of accountability?) I tend not to waste my time anymore trying to "explain" my professional observation/experience to people who really don't want to listen and digest anyways. In a nutshell, 1. standardized testing, charters/vouchers, and accountability aren't the magic pill and will not improve anything. 2. Lessen the effects of poverty. 3. early intervention pre-K education 4. innovate methodologies 5. better professional development for those involved. 6. accountability for students/parents (truancy, low grades)....for starts

    Iceman- Elaborate the 40 hours, summers off perception that you have. What do you do so I can try an make a connection?

    Peace.

    Thank you for the response and it makes alot of sense. My earlier post was just remarking what I sense is a frustration of outsiders when hearing the argument you made. Combining your earlier post with this one paints a more complete picture.

    Regarding the 40 hour a week job and summers off...hard to compare to my job in public accounting. Client-based, insane hours and travel. Although I make a pretty decent annual salary, my per/hour pay looks pathetic.

    I think the general perception of outsiders (including myself) is that teachers generally work 40 hours or less a week and do not work roughly 2-3 months a year. In comparison to a professional working a standard 40 hour work week 50 weeks a year, an average teacher is putting in 75-80% of the hours in comparison to that individual. I will counter by saying I know teachers that put in 50-60 hours a week during the school year. They also seem to be the exception and not the rule. Lastly, taking on this workload is optional to some degree and the hours are more flexible than most professions. The teacher can work an extra 2 hours outside the classroom from 3-5pm or 9-11pm for instance. I'm not saying my perception (or others) is reality - but it is my perception.

    Iceman3MSU

  • El Doctor B said...

    If a student with Downs doesn't learn to apply the quadratic equation, is it the fault of the student or teacher?

    Well, neither, El Doctor B, why would you be teaching a child with the mental capacity of a 6 year old the quadratic equation anyway?

    For clarification, a personal story. I recently had two brothers in my class as freshman. They HATED school. They could barely read, did terrible academically, and often got into trouble in and out of school. They lived with their mom, who could not read, did not have a job, nor did she ever have any real gainful employment in her life. At the end of freshman year, they each had about .5 credits to their name. They eventually dropped out after the first quarter of their "sophomore" year.

    One day during the beginning of their second year in high school, a teacher was having trouble with his lawnmower. He brought the lawnmower in for another teacher to look at, that just so happened to be a special education teacher who taught these two boys. He had the brothers take a look at the mower, and after about 45 minutes to an hour, had the lawnmower not only running again but fully functioning.

    Those two boys had a unique skill. That skill could have landed them fully employment. Instead, we insisted on trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. The result is that those two will probably never have a real job or pay taxes. They will probably be arrested multiple times in their lives and be absent parents. We arbitrarily assign a value to certain skills while dismissing others. Why? Well, honestly that system is inherently flawed and unequal. You can't say that, "well, if they just tried harder, they would get it." We value skills that those in power naturally possess through a solid, and frankly, rich upbringing. We devalue the others.

    So, the kid with Downs just needs to try harder, right?

    I know this is oversimplifying but if society valued lawnmower repair and were willing to pay significantly more than we do now for that service, schools would eventually be educating students on the finer points of lawnmower repair. Our society values different things. If God blessed you with a skill-set that won't make you monetarily rich in society, isn't it just meant to be and you should do the best with what skills you have? Not all skills can be valued equally. Can you imagine trying to educate our children if you had to specialize in literally everything?

    Iceman3MSU

  • The biggest issue is that teachers nowadays have so many variables when teaching on any given day that it would be hard for ANYONE to stay sane for a year, let alone a career.

    Even when I was in Michigan, teaching American Government in Michigan, the kids were in for a rude awaking on the way I ran classes. 3 parents tried to confront me on it, but after giving them the syllabus and telling them that in 6 months your kid will be treated the exact same way in college, they gave up their fight and bought into my system. Needless to say, I still have contact with many of those kids 5 years later because they realized that I was preparing for college and after, but yet respected them enough where sometimes I would spend 10 hours at the building to allow some kids to use my PC because they didn't have one, or just talk about life in general because they didn't have a male role model in their lives. Again, that is and never will be my issue with teaching. I can even deal with the crazy parents, I have a beef with the state mandates in THIS state when it comes to standardized testing.

    FYI, If my school under performs on the state test another 3 years straight, I'm out of job because the state will shut my school down.. And under performs means having less then 95% of students pass the state test.

    signature image

    12177 Post before moving here. 10/29/11 will live forever in our hearts (plus 50 votes in the last 3 hours)

    tJYD

  • Do you show your student your video from tPIR? Does that earn you respect from them or do they think less of you for it?

    "Put your mother in a straight-jacket you punk ass white boy." ~ Mike Tyson

    tig ol bitties19581

  • tig ol' bitties said...

    Do you show your student your video from tPIR? Does that earn you respect from them or do they think less of you for it?

    Does it really matter tig?

    signature image

    12177 Post before moving here. 10/29/11 will live forever in our hearts (plus 50 votes in the last 3 hours)

    tJYD

  • tJYD said...

    Does it really matter tig?

    I would have enjoyed a video of my teacher being on tPIR when I was in school.

    "Put your mother in a straight-jacket you punk ass white boy." ~ Mike Tyson

    tig ol bitties19581

  • Iceman3MSU said...

    Thank you for the response and it makes alot of sense. My earlier post was just remarking what I sense is a frustration of outsiders when hearing the argument you made. Combining your earlier post with this one paints a more complete picture.

    Regarding the 40 hour a week job and summers off...hard to compare to my job in public accounting. Client-based, insane hours and travel. Although I make a pretty decent annual salary, my per/hour pay looks pathetic.

    I think the general perception of outsiders (including myself) is that teachers generally work 40 hours or less a week and do not work roughly 2-3 months a year. In comparison to a professional working a standard 40 hour work week 50 weeks a year, an average teacher is putting in 75-80% of the hours in comparison to that individual. I will counter by saying I know teachers that put in 50-60 hours a week during the school year. They also seem to be the exception and not the rule. Lastly, taking on this workload is optional to some degree and the hours are more flexible than most professions. The teacher can work an extra 2 hours outside the classroom from 3-5pm or 9-11pm for instance. I'm not saying my perception (or others) is reality - but it is my perception.

    Iceman-

    I do not have the talent to do your job. Thanks for doing what you do and for doing it well.

    Teachers typically meet with kids by contract about 38-40 hours a week depending on the school. But, this does not include 30-120 minutes + tutoring, copying, meetings altering plans etc before and after school. Easily another 8 hours every week. (46-48 hrs). Then, there are other meetings, research, planning, grading (there is no grading fairy, eh?), etc. which adds another 5-20+ hours a week. I tend to average about 60 hours a week which puts me at about 2100 hours during the contract year. Last summer I averaged another 5-7 hours a week during my unpaid "summer off", rewriting curriculum, meeting with my AP students, researching and discussing innovative methodologies and strategies as well as taking grade classes that are mandated to keep my job. I spent another 40 hours in Chicago attending a conference for no college credit, no raise/step, mostly at my expense. So, I guess I put in about another 120 hours before August hit and I jumped back in to 20 hours weeks in August until schools starts. People in my department and I average about 2200-2400 hours a year more or less depending on the year's goals, trials and tribulations. This year with the way the politics have been, I bet I've been at 70-80 hours a week from Sept. to June. Typical?, who knows. Is a 40 hours work week and a unpaid "summer off" typical, well,...hardly, Every job has it's hardships, and bennies, 3-4 weeks of vacation (some paid). I have friends in Engineering, Management, Gov., and business and they all have different stories- some I envy, others I'm thankful not to have to do. BTW, not an excuse, just 'splainin my game. For those who envy my unpaid "summer off", I challenge you to put up or shut up and go into education. ;) Peace.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Third Generation Spartan, est. 1937 ------- Spartan by Birth, Spartan by Design.

    Colnago Spartan

  • Iceman3MSU said...

    I know this is oversimplifying but if society valued lawnmower repair and were willing to pay significantly more than we do now for that service, schools would eventually be educating students on the finer points of lawnmower repair. Our society values different things. If God blessed you with a skill-set that won't make you monetarily rich in society, isn't it just meant to be and you should do the best with what skills you have? Not all skills can be valued equally. Can you imagine trying to educate our children if you had to specialize in literally everything?

    Actually, you are proving my point. We have a system that is designed to really only educate the top percentage of students, those moving on to college. Historically, we had colleges first, then decided to create high schools to get those who were going to attend college, ready. The colleges set the table and decided what was needed.

    In my opinion, we are actually actually doing harm to both college bound and non-college bound students in many districts. Take a kid from Waverly HS who is going to college. Are they getting a rigorous enough prep for college, or are things somewhat dumbed down because there is a significant amount of non-college students in many of their classes? The non-college students do terrible and don't really gain a lot of applicable skills in their courses either.

    I won't get into the whole division of districts and the inequality based in those, but essentially, we should pool our resources and create more regional high schools with more specific skill sets in mind. In the Lansing area, you may have a couple high schools that are college prep, and each one may have a little different focus. One for math and sciences, one for the arts, etc. At the same time, you would have a couple different high schools that taught applicable skills and trades to those not on a college track. They would be job ready and trained after school.

    El Doctor B