Online Now 2758

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 2352
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 3004
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

UM spring game on BTN now (no I m not obsessed)

  • maize&blue21 said...

    It does,

    So if it does we'll have to go by common opponent at common venue if not head to head.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags ●

  • Sp4rt4ns said...

    Why be outraged about WVU and Clemson? They won their conferences. And you guys lost to best team you played (Us) and one of the not so great teams on your schedule (Iowa). Why not Arkansas when they won all of their games except for the very best teams in the nation?

    Because WVU and Clemson both play in terrible conferences. Arkansas should have been in it, but they didn't just lose their games, they got blown out.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • AASpartan said...

    No. Clemson should have been in the BCS. They won their conference and are in an AQ league. Michigan and VT were at-large teams that got selected over higher ranked teams for ratings purposes.

    And the beautiful irony is that it was a ratings dog.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Will do, almighty ruler of the internet.

    Realistically how many wins do you see for UM this year?

    TPain151807 ●

  • Sp4rt4ns said...

    Clemson had a better argument than UM did because, you know, they won their conference and all.

    Clemson also plays in one of the weakest conferences in the nation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Clemson also plays in one of the weakest conferences in the nation.

    Still they won it

    UM didn't even win their division and got awarded a BCS game

    TPain151807 ●

  • T-Pain said...

    Realistically how many wins do you see for UM this year?

    Probably 10, loss to Bama and maybe a loss against either MSU or OSU.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Probably 10, loss to Bama and maybe a loss against either MSU or OSU.

    LOL

    TPain151807 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Because WVU and Clemson both play in terrible conferences. Arkansas should have been in it, but they didn't just lose their games, they got blown out.

    By the two very best teams in the nation. You guys lost to Iowa and us both by two possessions. And how is it fair to knock Clemson and WVU when they are in AQ conferences and beat the teams necessary to win their conferences? Your basing this off of them not playing top competition like our teams have but scoff at the idea of us bringing up Wisconsin as a reason why we were better than you guys.

    Sp4rt4ns

  • T-Pain said...

    LOL

    Show me how that is unrealistic, Michigan returns their leading RB, have a senior QB leading the team, experience OL, all of the back 7 returning, and the top DEs returning.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Probably 10, loss to Bama and maybe a loss against either MSU or OSU.

    That's your're realistic expectation? Start preparing to have your heart broken more than a couple of times.

    Sp4rt4ns

  • Sp4rt4ns said...

    By the two very best teams in the nation. You guys lost to Iowa and us both by two possessions. And how is it fair to knock Clemson and WVU when they are in AQ conferences and beat the teams necessary to win their conferences? Your basing this off of them not playing top competition like our teams have but scoff at the idea of us bringing up Wisconsin as a reason why we were better than you guys.

    So you agree with the Big East being a AQ conference?

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Show me how that is unrealistic, Michigan returns their leading RB, have a senior QB leading the team, experience OL, all of the back 7 returning, and the top DEs returning.

    I like the fact how you didn't even bother to mention @ND or @Nebraska

    Like you're just assuming those are wins

    TPain151807 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Show me how that is unrealistic, Michigan returns their leading RB, have a senior QB leading the team, experience OL, all of the back 7 returning, and the top DEs returning.

    You don't play 8 home games. All your hard games are away. Denard has never been great against good competition. Another year isn't going to help that. you lose 2-3 starters on your d-line. No depth on either line.

    Sp4rt4ns

  • Sp4rt4ns said...

    That's your're realistic expectation? Start preparing to have your heart broken more than a couple of times.

    Like last season? The team that had a ton of question marks with very few answers and won 11 games? And Michigan is returning almost all of their starters, but we're going to lose more games?

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Show me how that is unrealistic, Michigan returns their leading RB, have a senior QB leading the team, experience OL, all of the back 7 returning, and the top DEs returning.

    Away vs ND Osu bama Nebraska and we're coming with bad intensions because of the letter writing campaign by um's athletic department claiming we treated them mean.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    So you agree with the Big East being a AQ conference?

    Nope. I just find it funny that you call their competition, that Michigan didn't play, no good, but get in a tizzy when we bring up Wisconsin.

    This post was edited by Sp4rt4ns on 4/14/2012 at 11:44 PM

    Sp4rt4ns

  • T-Pain said...

    I like the fact how you didn't even bother to mention @ND or @Nebraska

    Like you're just assuming those are wins

    Notre Dame has almost no DBs, two of their starting OL graduated, and they lost Aaron Lynch. Not even going to touch on their QB situation or the loss of Michael Floyd. Michigan beat Nebraska handily last year so I don't see why they won't beat them again.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Like last season? The team that had a ton of question marks with very few answers and won 11 games? And Michigan is returning almost all of their starters, but we're going to lose more games?

    You guys played 8 freaking home games last year and avoided the conference champions.

    Sp4rt4ns

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Like last season? The team that had a ton of question marks with very few answers and won 11 games? And Michigan is returning almost all of their starters, but we're going to lose more games?

    Look at the fucking schedule

    Bama to open up and you have ND, Nebraska, and OSU all away vs last year when you had them all home, plus MSU who has owned you 4 straight years

    A lot of UM fans I've talked to said they're expecting 8-4 or something like that

    10-2 is just absurd

    TPain151807 ●

  • D.Wags said...

    Away vs ND Osu bama Nebraska and we're coming with bad intensions because of the letter writing campaign by um's athletic department claiming we treated them mean.

    I'm shaking in my boots at the thought of your inexperienced QB and lack of any WRs.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

  • Just so you guys know, maize&blue21 is a 16 year old kid. He's a freaking junior in high school.

    Harry Callahan ●

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Notre Dame has almost no DBs, two of their starting OL graduated, and they lost Aaron Lynch. Not even going to touch on their QB situation or the loss of Michael Floyd. Michigan beat Nebraska handily last year so I don't see why they won't beat them again.

    What does last year have to do with this year?

    TPain151807 ●

  • T-Pain said...

    Look at the fucking schedule

    Bama to open up and you have ND, Nebraska, and OSU all away vs last year when you had them all home, plus MSU who has owned you 4 straight years

    A lot of UM fans I've talked to said they're expecting 8-4 or something like that

    10-2 is just absurd

    10-2 is a realistic goal for UM this year, but 8-4, and maybe even 9-3 is a realistic expectation

    get the new Nike MSU font: http://tinyurl.com/spartansfont

    Nutz Interface ●

  • T-Pain said...

    Look at the fucking schedule

    Bama to open up and you have ND, Nebraska, and OSU all away vs last year when you had them all home, plus MSU who has owned you 4 straight years

    A lot of UM fans I've talked to said they're expecting 8-4 or something like that

    10-2 is just absurd

    Once again, ND will not be good next season, Michigan destroyed Nebraska last year, and OSU has no OL. Not that worried. Also MSU is going to have to find a way to score.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21 ●

Michigan State
247Sports
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports