-
Floyd Robertson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
5603 votes total - Rolling Hills
- (7768)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Royal
- 5 stars Rating: 87
8576 votes total - Resident PUA
- (5981)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Motown Spartan
- 5 stars Rating: 89
11550 votes total - (6964)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Floyd Robertson said...
"The active chemical used in spray tans, dihydroxyacetone (DHA), has the potential to cause genetic alterations and DNA damage, according to a panel of medical experts who reviewed 10 of the most-current publicly available scientific studies on DHA for ABC News, including a federal report ABC News obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. "
I, for one, am shocked at this new development. I'm actually even more shocked a study was needed to raise concerns.
You're better off running down to Aco and getting a can Rust-Oleum bronze.
LoneWolfSparty
- 4 stars Rating: 66
11298 votes total - Permanently Banned
- (11542)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Rodeo Burger
- 5 stars Rating: 88
5852 votes total - (3853)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Floyd Robertson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
5603 votes total - Rolling Hills
- (7768)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Spartan8Ball
- 4 stars Rating: 62
5630 votes total - Baby Ruth?
- (5701)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
tig ol bitties19581 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 86
9528 votes total - Magicians' Alliance
- (11421)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LoneWolfSparty
- 4 stars Rating: 66
11298 votes total - Permanently Banned
- (11542)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Irritable_Bowel
- 5 stars Rating: 90
582 votes total - (691)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Count gHostula ●
- 4 stars Rating: 62
14996 votes total - (7314)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Rodeo Burger
- 5 stars Rating: 88
5852 votes total - (3853)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Tomp ●
- 5 stars Rating: 98
2827 votes total - New board, same name
- (1692)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Buffalo Spartan ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7634 votes total - 48÷2(9+3)= 288
- (7600)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
JMSparty08 said...
I would, but it would just be similar to what two other posters have already pointed out and you failed to take into consideration.
You go right ahead in your campaign against sunscreen though based on false assumptions that everyone everywhere in the world is exactly the same.
RPMadMSU
- 5 stars Rating: 93
9846 votes total - Eternal Bastion of Common Sense
- (16608)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Motown Spartan
- 5 stars Rating: 89
11550 votes total - (6964)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PPTPW51983 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
5752 votes total - (4170)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
Check out the chemicals in sunscreen.




baboon's ass
Wait, spray-tanning might pose a health risk?