Online Now 2144

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

On this Board 1631
Record: 12118 (3/18/2012)

Online now 2113
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

tOfficial 2012 Formula 1 thread

  • Cym Jim said...

    wv - any reason why Red Bull seem to have lost their dominance this year?

    Since nobody responded to this, I'll give it a go. From what I understand (which is, admittedly, somewhat limited), Red Bull lost their one big design advantage from last year: blown exhaust diffusers. With the design up until last year, exhaust could be channeled into the rear diffusers, creating more downforce. RB were apparently the best of the bunch at exploiting this design. With the new regulations, blown exhaust diffusers are illegal, and downforce in RB cars has decreased significantly and allowed other teams to catch up.

    Hope that was a good enough explanation. If anyone has anything to add, please feel free to chime in.

    signature image

    dubie7006

  • Mercedes first F1 win since they pulled out of racing in '55. If you're not familiar, check out the crash in the Le Mans race that year. Apparently the picture next to Douchebag in the dictionary is that of Hawthorne.

    spartan80

  • Lets be honest, nascar is better.

    Keith Stone

  • Off topic, but how is Hawthorn a douchebag? He was trying to win the race. If a driver is spending his time in the cockpit thinking about his car's braking rate versus the cars behind him, he's not going to be too quick. He had bigger things to think about at the moment. It's up to the drivers behind him to avoid the crash, not the other way around. It was a tragic racing accident, nothing more.

    Back on topic, kudos to Rosberg for finally putting it all together for a weekend.

    doug33

  • spartan80 said...

    Mercedes first F1 win since they pulled out of racing in '55. If you're not familiar, check out the crash in the Le Mans race that year. Apparently the picture next to Douchebag in the dictionary is that of Hawthorne.

    Stupid post. The sport was a mess regarding safety (or more accurately a lack of safety) in those days. That accident could have happened any weekend. Watch the documentary The Killer Years on Velocity TV.

    MSchott

  • Keith Stone said...

    Lets be honest, nascar is better.

    I'd rather drive finishing nails through my scrotum than watch NASCAR.

    MSchott

  • MSchott said...

    Stupid post. The sport was a mess regarding safety (or more accurately a lack of safety) in those days. That accident could have happened any weekend. Watch the documentary The Killer Years on Velocity TV.

    Agreed - it was just one of those things. Although I am fascinated that Spartan80 calls out Hawthorne, but not Macklin or Levegh. For years Macklin was blamed for not staying out of the way of the faster vehicles. He was also a bit of a noob compared to many of the other drivers. So why the hate on Hawthorne?

    And to go COMPLETELY off topic - has anyone read anything about the upcoming Ron Howard film, Rush? It's the story of the championship battle between Lauda and Hunt. I'm a huge Hunt the Shunt fan, so I hope it's decent. If nothing else it's got Olivia Wilde in it, so it won't be unwatchable.

    TravelinMan

  • TravelinMan said...

    Agreed - it was just one of those things. Although I am fascinated that Spartan80 calls out Hawthorne, but not Macklin or Levegh. For years Macklin was blamed for not staying out of the way of the faster vehicles. He was also a bit of a noob compared to many of the other drivers. So why the hate on Hawthorne?

    And to go COMPLETELY off topic - has anyone read anything about the upcoming Ron Howard film, Rush? It's the story of the championship battle between Lauda and Hunt. I'm a huge Hunt the Shunt fan, so I hope it's decent. If nothing else it's got Olivia Wilde in it, so it won't be unwatchable.

    I've not heard of the new flick. It sounds great. 1975 was about the time I became interested in F1 and Lauda was my favorite driver. He and Hunt were polar opposites.

    MSchott

  • MSchott said...

    I've not heard of the new flick. It sounds great. 1975 was about the time I became interested in F1 and Lauda was my favorite driver. He and Hunt were polar opposites.

    Yeah, the film has a lot of promise. So far I'm reading really good things about it. If it's realistic, parts of it may be a bit tough to watch. The Killer Years was tough, too. I was familiar with a lot of the stuff the Killer Years covered, but my wife - who thought F1 was crazy unsafe when we watched Senna, was simply horrified.

    It was a different time.

    TravelinMan

  • MSchott said...

    Stupid post. The sport was a mess regarding safety (or more accurately a lack of safety) in those days. That accident could have happened any weekend. Watch the documentary The Killer Years on Velocity TV.

    Actually, yours was the stupid post, but that's to be expected. The fact that safety wasn't a focus doesn't excuse outrageous driving that causes the weak safety to become a problem.

    You're correct that safety was a problem, drivers didn't wear seat belts because they though it was better to be thrown instead of trapped in a burning car. After the accident racing was banned at tracks in several European countries until safety problems at tracks could be fixed. All that said, a bad driver can make a safe track deadly.

    spartan80

  • TravelinMan said...

    Agreed - it was just one of those things. Although I am fascinated that Spartan80 calls out Hawthorne, but not Macklin or Levegh. For years Macklin was blamed for not staying out of the way of the faster vehicles. He was also a bit of a noob compared to many of the other drivers. So why the hate on Hawthorne?

    And to go COMPLETELY off topic - has anyone read anything about the upcoming Ron Howard film, Rush? It's the story of the championship battle between Lauda and Hunt. I'm a huge Hunt the Shunt fan, so I hope it's decent. If nothing else it's got Olivia Wilde in it, so it won't be unwatchable.

    You should check the vidos that show the course of events that caused the accident, and you'd have the answer to your questions.

    Hawthorne at speed (on left) passes the slower Macklin (on right) where he's supposed to be. Hawthorne belatedly sees his crew's sign to pit and hits his new disc brakes, cutting directly in front of Macklin because pit row is on the right side of the track. Macklin has nowhere to go but left to avoid Hawthorne. LeVegh at speed plows into Macklin and launches off the track and into the crowd, or at least the pieces of his car do.

    Hawthorne drives right past the camera, but also can't stop in time for his pit area and is forced to continue and pit the next lap.

    Here's the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkaJ7OI7cR4&feature=related Check the diagramming of the driving leading up to the wreck at about 17 minute mark.

    Incidently, the Mercedes Board met immediately on hearing of the wreck and decided to pull their team out of the race that they led, even though Mercedes was not at fault. Jaguar meanwhile, after causing the wreck, took advantage and won.

    This post was edited by spartan80 on 4/19/2012 at 10:27 AM

    spartan80

  • spartan80 said...

    Actually, yours was the stupid post, but that's to be expected. The fact that safety wasn't a focus doesn't excuse outrageous driving that causes the weak safety to become a problem.

    You're correct that safety was a problem, drivers didn't wear seat belts because they though it was better to be thrown instead of trapped in a burning car. After the accident racing was banned at tracks in several European countries until safety problems at tracks could be fixed. All that said, a bad driver can make a safe track deadly.

    Damn you're a douchebag. Why so hostile?

    MSchott

  • MSchott said...

    Damn you're a douchebag. Why so hostile?

    Don't be stupid, I didn't say anything in my post that you didn't say in yours, but I'm the douchebag? Also, you spoke outta your ass about the incident in question. Watch the video about the wreck and learn something, so you don't call folks who actually know what they're speaking of, stupid.

    spartan80

  • Was the track unsafe? Yes. Were the cars unsafe? Yes. Do these sorts of things happen in races today? Yes. Drivers do stupid things on the track on a regular basis, this is not unlike situations that I've been in numerous times. It was a freak accident, nothing more. In hindsight, Hawthorn's decision was not the best, but hindsight is much more clear than a split second decision, in a racecar, during the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

    doug33

  • spartan80 said...

    Don't be stupid, I didn't say anything in my post that you didn't say in yours, but I'm the douchebag? Also, you spoke outta your ass about the incident in question. Watch the video about the wreck and learn something, so you don't call folks who actually know what they're speaking of, stupid.

    OK, let's all take a deep breath and calm the hell down here. It's a 57 year old accident we're talking about here for pity's sake.

    I'm familiar with the accident, have seen the footage previously, and read many books on it, actually. (Austin Healey owner here)

    Many have actually blamed Levegh. I was just curious as to your immediate and harsh reaction to Hawthorne, but hey - clearly we've got some strong opinions here, so never mind.

    TravelinMan

  • spartan80 said...

    Don't be stupid, I didn't say anything in my post that you didn't say in yours, but I'm the douchebag? Also, you spoke outta your ass about the incident in question. Watch the video about the wreck and learn something, so you don't call folks who actually know what they're speaking of, stupid.

    I object to your calling Hawthorne the definition of a douchebag. You're being an idiot about this. There is a very objective analysis of this crash done by the esteemed racer and journalist Paul Frere which absolves Hawthorne of blame. There are numerous causes for the accident. Don't blame Hawthorne.

    MSchott

  • I stopped posting in Wells to get away from this kind of ****.

    Let's go back to light hearted mockery of Bernie and Bahrain!

    attachment

    TravelinMan

  • 7 races and 7 different winners! What a season! Championship is wide open 1/3 of the way through! Can Kimi, Grosjean, or Schumacher make it 8 for 8??

    Massa is finally seemingly coming to terms with his Ferarri, but I still think it's a done deal that Perez is in that seat next year.

    I had been starting to feel like Hamilton was a goner from McLaren after all the eff ups they've had this season, but watching him and Martin Witmarsh celebrate together after that win, I don't think so anymore.

    This post was edited by Winston Wolf on 6/11/2012 at 11:01 AM

    Winston Wolf

  • Winston Wolf said...

    7 races and 7 different winners! What a season! Championship is wide open 1/3 of the way through! Can Kimi, Grosjean, or Schumacher make it 8 for 8??

    Massa is finally seemingly coming to terms with his Ferarri, but I still think it's a done deal that Perez is in that seat next year.

    I had been starting to feel like Hamilton was a goner from McLaren after all the eff ups they've had this season, but watching him and Martin Witmarsh celebrate together after that win, I don't think so anymore.

    I just can't see Hamilton being teammates with Alonso again. I'm not saying it was on the level of a Senna/Prost thing, but they had some truly epic hatred for one another while together at McLaren. I'm betting he re-signs.

    It's been a crazy season.

    TravelinMan

  • TravelinMan said...

    I just can't see Hamilton being teammates with Alonso again. I'm not saying it was on the level of a Senna/Prost thing, but they had some truly epic hatred for one another while together at McLaren. I'm betting he re-signs.

    It's been a crazy season.

    I don't think Hamilton would go to Ferrari. It's more likely he'd go to RBR and replace Webber. I think Perez teams up with Alonso next year.

    Winston Wolf

  • Winston Wolf said...

    7 races and 7 different winners! What a season! Championship is wide open 1/3 of the way through! Can Kimi, Grosjean, or Schumacher make it 8 for 8??

    Massa is finally seemingly coming to terms with his Ferarri, but I still think it's a done deal that Perez is in that seat next year.

    I had been starting to feel like Hamilton was a goner from McLaren after all the eff ups they've had this season, but watching him and Martin Witmarsh celebrate together after that win, I don't think so anymore.

    the only place hamilton really has to go if he were to leave mclaren would be red bull, and i think webber is the perfect compliment to vettel..... I do agree that I think this is massa's last year at ferrari... who replaces him? perez is a good shout... Maldonado possibly

    sarcyspice

  • sarcyspice said...

    the only place hamilton really has to go if he were to leave mclaren would be red bull, and i think webber is the perfect compliment to vettel..... I do agree that I think this is massa's last year at ferrari... who replaces him? perez is a good shout... Maldonado possibly

    Maldonado, possibly. But didn't Perez come up through the Ferrari young driver program?

    I'm also hoping to see Alexander Rossi get in with Caterham next year.

    Winston Wolf