Online Now 2700

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

On this Board 109
Record: 3125 (3/22/2013)

Online now 2533
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

'13 MI OG Cameron Dillard (Florida Verbal)

  • Tupes said...

    Im not a scout. But isn't it near impossible to know if a high school Jr. can be an OT/OG? I mean, when they scouted Dan France as a junior, did they say "he's got OT potential!" Maybe they did...but I doubt it. I'm just in favor of taking the best trench guys we can find, and developing them as best we can, and let the chips fall. My own, uninformed opinion is that we should not NOT take a talent like Dillard just because we MIGHT get another stud OG/OT later on.

    France was a DE who grew into a DT who was then moved to OT. That's a definite exception to the rule.

    It's very rare to see a 6'3 OT, just as it's rare to see a 6'6 OG. OT's favor guys with long arms; think of the OT's body being the center of a circle with the circumference being his arm-length. The idea is that the DE has to go all the way around the OT's arms; longer the arms, the farther the DE has to go. Ideally by the time the DE gets past the OT, the QB already has thrown his pass.

    OGs, OTOH, need to be low to the ground to try and get under the pad levels of the DTs (who are also coached to get low). It's a lot easier for a 6'2 - 6'4 guy to get down as compared to a 6'6- 6'8 guy, especially when DTs are in the 6'0 - 6'5 range.

    These are all prototypes; I think Bama started a 6'3 OT last year lol. What matters most is their hand technique, particularly on the interior and lateral movement (OTs). For run-blocking, it's all about lower body strength as well as lateral movement, especially for zone-blocking plays (think of Edwin Baker's long TD vs. ND in 2010, or Bell vs. UM in 2010). State's had good success with pulling OGs; McDonald was a track athlete who ran a 4.6 at 6'5 265 in HS and is now over 300 pounds. No way for scouts to project that he'd be able to keep that athleticism with 35 more pounds on his frame, which is why recruiting services whiff on OL quite often (See Badgers, Wisconsin, Hawkeyes, Iowa).

    The issue this year boils down to scholarship #s. Reports are that this class will be 12-14. State wants to take as many plan A guys as possible; there isn't room for 5 OL in this class, as much as I'd love to see it. Dillard is plan B at OG right now to Kuglar.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Rivals doesn't update their top 250 on a rolling basis like 247 does. If anything, this is evidence that the services do NOT go by offers, but rather camp performances/in-season performance.

    Of course Rivals goes by camp performances... why else would Cass Tech kids be ranked?

    Lunchables

  • SpartanRocky said...

    France was a DE who grew into a DT who was then moved to OT. That's a definite exception to the rule.

    It's very rare to see a 6'3 OT, just as it's rare to see a 6'6 OG. OT's favor guys with long arms; think of the OT's body being the center of a circle with the circumference being his arm-length. The idea is that the DE has to go all the way around the OT's arms; longer the arms, the farther the DE has to go. Ideally by the time the DE gets past the OT, the QB already has thrown his pass.

    OGs, OTOH, need to be low to the ground to try and get under the pad levels of the DTs (who are also coached to get low). It's a lot easier for a 6'2 - 6'4 guy to get down as compared to a 6'6- 6'8 guy, especially when DTs are in the 6'0 - 6'5 range.

    These are all prototypes; I think Bama started a 6'3 OT last year lol. What matters most is their hand technique, particularly on the interior and lateral movement (OTs). For run-blocking, it's all about lower body strength as well as lateral movement, especially for zone-blocking plays (think of Edwin Baker's long TD vs. ND in 2010, or Bell vs. UM in 2010). State's had good success with pulling OGs; McDonald was a track athlete who ran a 4.6 at 6'5 265 in HS and is now over 300 pounds. No way for scouts to project that he'd be able to keep that athleticism with 35 more pounds on his frame, which is why recruiting services whiff on OL quite often (See Badgers, Wisconsin, Hawkeyes, Iowa).

    The issue this year boils down to scholarship #s. Reports are that this class will be 12-14. State wants to take as many plan A guys as possible; there isn't room for 5 OL in this class, as much as I'd love to see it. Dillard is plan B at OG right now to Kuglar.

    That was a fantastic analysis. The Don Bosco transfer from Vandy is also going to play OG isn't he? Keep that in mind. I think he was a DE/DT there but played as a true freshman at OG/C in three or four games.

    Skip1856

  • Skip1856 said...

    That was a fantastic analysis. The Don Bosco transfer from Vandy is also going to play OG isn't he? Keep that in mind. I think he was a DE/DT there but played as a true freshman at OG/C in three or four games.

    Everything I've heard has him listed as a DT for us shrug

    Cool Runnings

  • Skip1856 said...

    That was a fantastic analysis. The Don Bosco transfer from Vandy is also going to play OG isn't he? Keep that in mind. I think he was a DE/DT there but played as a true freshman at OG/C in three or four games.

    The coaches most likely want him at DT.. at least that's what he was quoted as saying when he got here.

    Lunchables

  • SpartanRocky said...

    France was a DE who grew into a DT who was then moved to OT. That's a definite exception to the rule.

    He was actually an OLB in High Schoo! scared

    Natron tSpartan

  • Skip1856 said...

    That was a fantastic analysis. The Don Bosco transfer from Vandy is also going to play OG isn't he? Keep that in mind. I think he was a DE/DT there but played as a true freshman at OG/C in three or four games.

    3-tech DT (Worthy's position). He did play OG/C at Vandy as a true FR. He was an Under-Armor All American, which is kind of cool.

    In any event, his arrival does not impact the OL recruiting directly, but it DOES concern the # of scholarships available. I do not believe he was on scholarship last year.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    3-tech DT (Worthy's position). He did play OG/C at Vandy as a true FR. He was an Under-Armor All American, which is kind of cool.

    In any event, his arrival does not impact the OL recruiting directly, but it DOES concern the # of scholarships available. I do not believe he was on scholarship last year.

    James Kittredge is not on scholarship yet. He may receive a scholarship this Fall.
    He played DT on the Scout Team last season.

    CoachedByDuffy

  • CoachedByDuffy said...

    James Kittredge is not on scholarship yet. He may receive a scholarship this Fall. He played DT on the Scout Team last season.

    At any rate. My apologies for taking Dillard's thread off topic. I remembered reading that he played OL/C at Vandy and wondered if he'd drift that direction regardless of what he played in high school. Thought we were forgetting about him and that it played into this but I was definitely off.
    That being said, I've got my fingers crossed we see the light and hope it's not too late but with 12-14 schollies it'll be a weird year.

    Skip1856

  • Skip1856 said...

    At any rate. My apologies for taking Dillard's thread off topic. I remembered reading that he played OL/C at Vandy and wondered if he'd drift that direction regardless of what he played in high school. Thought we were forgetting about him and that it played into this but I was definitely off. That being said, I've got my fingers crossed we see the light and hope it's not too late but with 12-14 schollies it'll be a weird year.

    Here's the summary:

    1. MSU is tight on scholarships, but needs OL

    2. MSU is targeting multiple highly regarded OL

    3. Dillard is on the next tier on MSU's recruiting board

    4. Dillard is a pretty highly regarded prospect in his own right

    5. Dillard is receiving more and more attention from BCS schools than most anticipated

    6. Despite that, MSU is looking for 1 OG and 1 C this next year.

    7. Dillard is visiting this weekend and may receive an offer, rendering the last 20 posts moot lol.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • MSU is not going to sign an OC for 2013. They will take only one interior OL and that will be an OG.
    The exception will be if they can get Patrick Kugler and the staff thinks Kugler can play OG/OC/OT. Then they would also offer Dillard.
    The staff is hoping to sign 3 OT's for 2013 and an absolute minimum of 2 OT's.
    There are several players on the Roster already who can play OC; Travis Jackson, Jack Allen, Blake Treadwell, Ethan Ruhland, Nate Klatt, Connor Kruse, and Kyle Lints.

    This post was edited by CoachedByDuffy on 2/22/2012 at 2:04 PM

    CoachedByDuffy

  • CoachedByDuffy said...

    MSU is not going to sign an OC for 2013. They will take only one interior OL and that will be an OG. The exception will be if they can get Patrick Kugler and the staff thinks he can play OG/OC/OT. Then they would also offer Dillard. The staff is hoping to sign 3 OT's for 2013 and an absolute minimum of 2 OT's. There are several players on the Roster already who can play OC; Travis Jackson, Jack Allen, Blake Treadwell, Ethan Ruhland, Nate Klatt, Connor Kruse, and Kyle Lints.

    So do you think Dillard is going to get an offer this weekend? He's blowing up big time and the more time we let that sit the more likely we lose him.

    Macks

  • CoachedByDuffy said...

    MSU is not going to sign an OC for 2013. They will take only one interior OL and that will be an OG. The exception will be if they can get Patrick Kugler and the staff thinks he can play OG/OC/OT. Then they would also offer Dillard. The staff is hoping to sign 3 OT's for 2013 and an absolute minimum of 2 OT's. There are several players on the Roster already who can play OC; Travis Jackson, Jack Allen, Blake Treadwell, Ethan Ruhland, Nate Klatt, Connor Kruse, and Kyle Lints.

    Of those, 2 are RS JRs (Treadwell and Klatt), 2 ar walk-ons (Kruse and Lints) and 1 is a RS (Ruhland).

    They have to take a C in '14.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • FWIW- Helmholdt on Rivals chat said Dillard is comfortable snapping the ball, making him more attractive to teams.

    Big M

  • Macks said...

    So do you think Dillard is going to get an offer this weekend? He's blowing up big time and the more time we let that sit the more likely we lose him.

    I think Dillard will receive an offer this weekend but at this time, I don't have any firm info on that.

    CoachedByDuffy

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Of those, 2 are RS JRs (Treadwell and Klatt), 2 ar walk-ons (Kruse and Lints) and 1 is a RS (Ruhland).

    They have to take a C in '14.

    Yes, MSU will need an OC in 2014 but with limited scholarships in 2013, they will not sign a true OC for 2013.

    CoachedByDuffy

  • CoachedByDuffy said...

    The staff is hoping to sign 3 OT's for 2013 and an absolute minimum of 2 OT's.

    3 OTs was what I was thinking as well, CBD. I'm assuming that 1 is Norman, who projects to a RT. Is there anyone on the board who projects to a LT?

    WavSpartan

  • WavSpartan said...

    3 OTs was what I was thinking as well, CBD. I'm assuming that 1 is Norman, who projects to a RT. Is there anyone on the board who projects to a LT?

    How about Ethan Pocic?

    detrocks

  • detrocks said...

    How about Ethan Pocic?

    Pocic would be fantastic to get but seems like a longshot imo.

    Macks

  • detrocks said...

    How about Ethan Pocic?

    I'd love to get him. Seems less and less likely though....

    WavSpartan

  • CoachedByDuffy said...

    Yes, MSU will need an OC in 2014 but with limited scholarships in 2013, they will not sign a true OC for 2013.

    Allen's little brother is a '14 C seems like almost a lock the staff is waiting for him to be the next center they take

    Lockwood09

  • Saw his name repeadtedly as an attendee this weekend with a good possibility of an offer. Didn't see his name on roll call news. Is this dude seriously not going to show up now, or are we just unconfirmed?

    Skip1856

  • Dillard is blowing up. His offer sheet is growing by the day and is very impressive. 247 has him as a 88 and the #8 player in Michigan. He has almost 20 offers including Fla, Oregon, Va Tech, Missouri and both Arizona teams. He is certain to be a 4 star soon by 247 and Rivals. Norman is the #3 player in state per 247 but has very few offers. I dont doubt Norman is a very good player and a likely commit but Dillard is soaring I say we need to make that offer to Dillard, he is too good to pass up and he is an in state kid which is very important. Norman, Dillard and Kugler would be a great OL class. I think Dillard might be the one I would want the most. UM might move on Dillard soon as well. They are still looking for a C recruit and Dillard could fit that bill. Another reason to move fast on Dillard.

    82msuspartan

  • With limited schollies comes a more methodical approach in recruiting.
    These O Linemen haven't even played a down of football in their senior year yet. Relax guys... You can still recruit a kid without giving him an offer.
    Guard isn't the big concern for this class so I expect the staff to take their time and really try to hit a homerun.
    Granted if Dillard shows he can be that homer... He'll get the offer.

    signature image

    ~We're all armchair coaches & 20 yrs of mediocrity before Dantonio has turned us all into pathetic sociopaths who know no joy or excitement~

    spartan 4show

  • It's not a certainty that Dillard will receive an MSU offer this weekend.
    MSU will take only one interior OL for 2013.
    Patrick Kugler is still the # 1 priority @ OG on MSU's recruiting board.
    A lot will depend on how much interest Kugler will show for MSU when the coaching staff talks with him one-on-one tomorrow.
    It's very possible that MSU won't offer Dillard this weekend. If Dillard doesn't get an offer this weekend, he will probably stop visiting MSU in the future.

    CoachedByDuffy