In partnership with CBSSports.com
The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web
The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts
"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion
"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion
This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion
The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.
Sounds like his dad is dragging the process out to me
laying in the weeds
No, we have a chance still because of Narduzzi.
Personally, with all the QB's we've currently got I'd rather see the scholly on one of the lines as opposed to taking a guy not named Henderson or O'Connor.
So you're willing to say, "No, thanks." to a 4-star QB? You must be a baaad man!
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by 0915426A 17 months ago
If you have a lot of QBs why take one? They give so many QBs 4 star ratings its not like it really means that much. Practically every single QB taken by a B1G school in 2013 was a 4 star.
Those two are good, but don't discount Durkin. The kid is an absolute stud, and a great leader. I'd gladly take Durkin in a heartbeat. However, I do not disagree about the trench needs.
"Stats are for Losers." - Pat "Nardawg" Narduzzi
The scouting aces on this board already have Terry penciled in as a 4-year starter, and also he will never get injured. We don't need any back-ups, ever.
So we wouldn't need a QB after Terry?
Now with a PhD in Applied Llama Physics...
And then one of the QB's transfers or gets hurt and retires and MSU is in a situation where the starter doesn't have anyone pushing him like Maxwell last season. Brilliant.
I guess not, since we are turning down 4-star QBs like Deshone Kizer because, well, just because.
QB's are the face of a program and All the QB's we have offered in 2014, would be great additions to STATE... 1st off, not many teams can offer immediate playing time to True Freshman QB's.. and quite frankly, there are few QB's that are deserving of playing time as a True Frosh.. If a QB we have recruited thinks he should start his freshman year, than he better prove it.. otherwise let him learn the system like the last 4 NFL QB's we have had in a row... Really, what's the worst that can happen, we end up with too much depth and someone decides to transfer. Either way, competition, breads success... and i would love to see Henderson in the G & W
Deshone Kizer doesn't want to go to MSU. We're a leader because no one he deems better has come after him yet. Read one of his interviews.
Well we've got 1 more year with Maxwell, 3 more years with Connor cook, 4 more years with Tyler O'Connor and 5 more years with Terry including a redshirt, plus I believe Badonovic is in there too, although I don't know what his eligibility situation is. Additionally, in a bad situation, Lippett, Cox, etc. we're all accomplished HS qb's. now that's a stretch, but my point is we seem to be covered for now.
This is a 14' discussion by the way and I should have started it on there.
Not that it matters at all because we got our guy, but Henderson popped to UNC tonight.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports