Online Now 2282

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

On this Board 149
Record: 3425 (1/27/2013)

Online now 2294
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

12 Secret Service Agents Fired, that can't be good for Obama..

  • GRR Spartan said...

    if you think this goes to the top you have your heads is your asses.

    The Secret Service is one of the only areas that the President isn't supposed to worry about. They are supposed to have their shit in one bag so the President doesn't have to take care of travel/security details.

    Of course fallenangel is so on top of things the fool moves to MA and then bitches about their mandated health care.

    more lies old man, but I guess I can't really call them deliberate, I hope I don't get alzheimer's anytime soon so I definitely empathize with your situation. FTR I have been in Massachusetts since 1995. According to you everyone should leave the state they have lived in most of their lives if they don't agree with one law of that particular state. You are such a rational individual uhoh

    fallenangle

  • looks like it all went down over 47 bucks clap

    I know the SS is under-funded/staffed, but this is ridiculous...

    Interesting that the whores have to leave their ID's at the front desk. Since nobody wants hookers to stick around and spend the night when they are finished ( unless they're one of the morons who think they found the elusive hooker with the heart of gold unlike the hookers with the regular old hookers heart..), then my guess is this one particular agent had massive amounts of blow and had been going at it until the sun came up with the promise of paying her more than her normal rate, probably forgetting he blew it all on charlie!

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by fallenangle on 4/15/2012 at 5:58 PM

    fallenangle

  • MSULordyoda said...

    So you seriously think your opinion of Obama's leadership is why these agents decided to get hookers?

    And you know, I take my job pretty seriously but that doesn't mean I don't do things on my own time that some leaders of my company may not exactly like.

    You're reaching here.....again.

    Wrong, hookers were not supposed to brought into a security cleared area since Obama was going to be staying at that same hotel. Which is why they got into trouble.

    I think leadership indicates how the people underneath that particular leader act.

    PassTheRock

  • PassTheRock said...

    Wrong, hookers were not supposed to brought into a security cleared area since Obama was going to be staying at that same hotel. Which is why they got into trouble.

    I think leadership indicates how the people underneath that particular leader act.

    Are you certain it was the same hotel? The report I heard on one of the alphabet news channels was that Obama was staying at a different hotel, so I'm curious if he was supposed to originally stay at that same hotel but had to move it to another one because it had been compromised. Incidentally why doesn't the POTUS just stay overnight in Airforce 1 when he's away on business? I saw the interior on a documentary once and it's better than any 5Star hotel you'll find anywhere in the world. Seems to me it would be saving a lot of money not having to rent all those rooms for agents amongst other expenses.

    fallenangle

  • PassTheRock said...

    Wrong, hookers were not supposed to brought into a security cleared area since Obama was going to be staying at that same hotel. Which is why they got into trouble.

    I think leadership indicates how the people underneath that particular leader act.

    You are one of the dumbest SOB's ever to discover this place.

    You are truly a clueless individual. You getting talking points from the GOP National committee or Issa's office?

    This post was edited by GRR Spartan on 4/15/2012 at 10:03 PM

    GRR Spartan

  • Nitro Biscuits said...

    As if Obama manages his security detail. This argument is so bad.

    This is just more of opti's view that nothing that happened under dubya was ever dubya's fault, but everything that happens under Obama is Obama's fault. He's just a schtick.

    Madhatter536

  • GRR Spartan said...

    You are one of the dumbest SOB's ever to discover this place.

    You are truly a clueless individual. You getting talking points from the GOP National committee or Issa's office?

    roflmao

    Those statements were from both CBN and MSNBC, they both said exactly the same thing.

    Perhaps you missed all the new coverage yesterday on why this was important?

    PassTheRock

  • PassTheRock said...

    roflmao

    Those statements were from both CBN and MSNBC, they both said exactly the same thing.

    Perhaps you missed all the new coverage yesterday on why this was important?

    You mean this CNN link that says they were NOT staying at the same Hotel as Obama and were NOT part of his immediate protective detail?

    So do you want to try again?

    Obama wants 'rigorous' investigation of Secret Service prostitution claims - CNN.com

    President Barack Obama called Sunday for a investigation into allegations involving prostitutes and Secret Service agents in Colombia.

    www.cnn.com

    MSULordyoda

  • MSULordyoda said...

    You mean this CNN link that says they were NOT staying at the same Hotel as Obama and were NOT part of his immediate protective detail?

    So do you want to try again?

    That's not what they said originally and you know it---every cable news channel went with they were staying at the same hotel as Obama but they weren't part of the Presidential detail.

    PassTheRock

  • PassTheRock said...

    That's not what they said originally and you know it---every cable news channel went with they were staying at the same hotel as Obama but they weren't part of the Presidential detail.

    Keep pitching but no one is catching the shit you keep hoping will stick.

    Your argument is just dumb. There are a lot of things incoming presidents and their staffs have to consider and making sure the Secret Service isn't whoring around on trips to Central America isn't on any list.

    GRR Spartan

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Keep pitching but no one is catching the shit you keep hoping will stick.

    Your argument is just dumb. There are a lot of things incoming presidents and their staffs have to consider and making sure the Secret Service isn't whoring around on trips to Central America isn't on any list.

    roflmao

    Sorry, you lose---even at different hotels, CNN and Wolf Blitzer is saying you do not want to bring anyone into those areas that can gather information, or access to anyone close to the situation who can be potentially bribed, etc.

    I take it you are a staunch democrat and cannot see this situation in an unbiased way?

    PassTheRock

  • PassTheRock said...

    That's not what they said originally and you know it---every cable news channel went with they were staying at the same hotel as Obama but they weren't part of the Presidential detail.


    The article I linked to was published yesterday and you were the one stating how that coverage was a big deal yesterday.

    This article was published on Saturday...again stating they were NOT staying at the same hotel. Even the WaPo who first broke the story never mentioned they were staying at the same hotel.

    So you're wrong...again.

    Are you going to admit that you're wrong or keep disputing the facts?

    Secret Service agents relieved in Colombia amid prostitution allegations - CNN.com

    Secret Service agents sent to Colombia ahead of President Barack Obama were sent home amid allegations of misconduct, officials said.

    www.cnn.com

    U.S. Secret Service agents recalled from Colombia - The Washington Post

    Agents accompanying Obama sent home amid misconduct allegations including contact with prostitutes.

    www.washingtonpost.com

    MSULordyoda

  • PassTheRock said...

    roflmao

    Sorry, you lose---even at different hotels, CNN and Wolf Blitzer is saying you do not want to bring anyone into those areas that can gather information, or access to anyone close to the situation who can be potentially bribed, etc.

    I take it you are a staunch democrat and cannot see this situation in an unbiased way?

    No, actually you lose.

    YOU SAID THEY WERE STAYING AT THE SAME HOTEL. I HAVE SHOWN YOU TO BE WRONG.

    Now you're just being your usual delusional self trying to change your story yet again.

    Seriously, my wife says I have problems with this when she's mad at me, there is no way you can be married.

    MSULordyoda

  • MSULordyoda said...

    No, actually you lose.

    YOU SAID THEY WERE STAYING AT THE SAME HOTEL. I HAVE SHOWN YOU TO BE WRONG.

    Now you're just being your usual delusional self trying to change your story yet again.

    Seriously, my wife says I have problems with this when she's mad at me, there is no way you can be married.


    Yep, you were correct, they were staying at different hotels---but at first they said they were staying at the same hotel, then it was more than one guy, then twelve guys, then less than twelve guys, and then 11 guys!! Can't they count?lol

    Then they were directly protecting him, then indirectly protecting him, protecting him but not part of the Presidential detail. lol

    This post was edited by PassTheRock on 4/16/2012 at 10:16 AM

    PassTheRock

  • fallenangle said...

    looks like it all went down over 47 bucks clap

    I know the SS is under-funded/staffed, but this is ridiculous...

    WOTS is the $47 was regarding who was going to pay for the hookers contraception.

    Everybody wants someone else to pay for their contraception.

    I blame Sandra Fluke...Sandra Fluke has ruined Secret Service careers

    This post was edited by Contrarian on 4/16/2012 at 11:36 AM

    Contrarian

  • PassTheRock said...

    Yep, you were correct, they were staying at different hotels---but at first they said they were staying at the same hotel, then it was more than one guy, then twelve guys, then less than twelve guys, and then 11 guys!! Can't they count?

    Then they were directly protecting him, then indirectly protecting him, protecting him but not part of the Presidential detail.

    The fact is that this all went down Thursday, and Obama arrived on what, Saturday? If this were a "scout" group as reported it would entirely make sense that the POTUS was originally going to stay at that same hotel since it would have been secured by them days before his arrival, however since it got compromised they had to switch hotels at the last minute. This scenario would make sense based on what you heard and the facts that have since come out. Some people, unlike you, don't have the ability to think outside the box apparently. I'm not saying you are right or they are right, but what you said 100% makes sense to any logical thinking individual

    fallenangle

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Keep pitching but no one is catching the shit you keep hoping will stick.

    Your argument is just dumb. There are a lot of things incoming presidents and their staffs have to consider and making sure the Secret Service isn't whoring around on trips to Central America isn't on any list.

    uh yeah, Colombia isn't in Central America...typical American, why don't you take a trip outside of the US for once in your life

    fallenangle

  • fallenangle said...

    The fact is that this all went down Thursday, and Obama arrived on what, Saturday? If this were a "scout" group as reported it would entirely make sense that the POTUS was originally going to stay at that same hotel since it would have been secured by them days before his arrival, however since it got compromised they had to switch hotels at the last minute. This scenario would make sense based on what you heard and the facts that have since come out. Some people, unlike you, don't have the ability to think outside the box apparently. I'm not saying you are right or they are right, but what you said 100% makes sense to any logical thinking individual

    Sure because they were able to get everything switched in a day prior to his arrival.

    You do know the preparation that goes into these things don't you?

    MSULordyoda

  • fallenangle said...

    The fact is that this all went down Thursday, and Obama arrived on what, Saturday? If this were a "scout" group as reported it would entirely make sense that the POTUS was originally going to stay at that same hotel since it would have been secured by them days before his arrival, however since it got compromised they had to switch hotels at the last minute. This scenario would make sense based on what you heard and the facts that have since come out. Some people, unlike you, don't have the ability to think outside the box apparently. I'm not saying you are right or they are right, but what you said 100% makes sense to any logical thinking individual

    Agree, good points, and thanks for the kind words.

    PassTheRock

  • PassTheRock said...

    Agree, good points, and thanks for the kind words.

    Hilarious. You finally found someone as delusional as yourself. roflmao

    Madhatter536

  • Madhatter536 said...

    Hilarious. You finally found someone as delusional as yourself. roflmao

    Dude...do you ever contribute anything to a thread other than derogatory statements towards another poster who has a different ideological slant than you? Are you able to put together and give forth an original, well thought out opinion that doesn't include calling someone a name? You remind me of the little punk in the neighborhood who would antagonize the other kids, but would always do it from his porch.

    I'm being serious. There is a serious brain drain going on here.

    This post was edited by Contrarian on 4/16/2012 at 2:24 PM

    Contrarian

  • Contrarian said...

    Dude...do you ever contribute anything to a thread other than derogatory statements towards another poster who has a different ideological slant than you? Are you able to put together and give forth an original, well thought out opinion that doesn't include calling someone a name? You remind me of the little punk in the neighborhood who would antagonize the other kids, but would always do it from his porch.

    I'm being serious. There is a serious brain drain going on here.

    I'm sorry your brain is drained. I have noticed it for a couple of weeks, but I'm glad you are finally aware of it.

    Madhatter536

  • Contrarian said...

    Dude...do you ever contribute anything to a thread other than derogatory statements towards another poster who has a different ideological slant than you? Are you able to put together and give forth an original, well thought out opinion that doesn't include calling someone a name? You remind me of the little punk in the neighborhood who would antagonize the other kids, but would always do it from his porch.

    I'm being serious. There is a serious brain drain going on here.

    Oh come on man, there are dozens of posters who do the same damn thing.

    Anyway, he's trolling....repeatedly and you guys continue to swallow it hook line and sinker.

    MSULordyoda

  • Madhatter536 said...

    I'm sorry your brain is drained. I have noticed it for a couple of weeks, but I'm glad you are finally aware of it.

    Thanks for re-emphasizing my point.

    Contrarian

  • MSULordyoda said...

    Oh come on man, there are dozens of posters who do the same damn thing.

    Anyway, he's trolling....repeatedly and you guys continue to swallow it hook line and sinker.

    I'd estimate that 90% of the posters here are interested in intelligent debate about politics and current events...the other 10% take away from the civility and just make this place a sewer.

    I don't care what their political ideologies are...if the only thing you are going to contribute is sniping at other posters by calling them names...you are wasting your time here. You have a rebuttal or a counter point...put some thought into it...or something other than what Madhatter contributes.

    And enough with the shtick accusations....we are all faceless and nameless people posting on a internet message board....we are all shticks

    This post was edited by Contrarian on 4/16/2012 at 2:58 PM

    Contrarian