Online Now 1520

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

On this Board 63
Record: 3425 (1/27/2013)

Online now 1420
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Are YOU better off now than three years ago?

  • Roger Waters said...

    All the Republican replies in this thread are a perfect example of why things will never improve. During the past several months of republican primaries, the right railed against Romney and spoke of how out of touch he is, how his policies change based on who is asking the questions, but now that 'your side' has picked its nominee, you guys will do anything to 'win' regardless of whether those things will be beneficial to the health of the country and despite the fact that you despised Romney only a few months ago.

    I am not very happy with Obama (whom i did not vote for). I'm even less happy with congress, and yet even more unhappy with the ideological and corporate hijacking of the government.

    Why can't we seriously discuss policies and governmental and economic theory based on prior usage and results and then choose the candidate which alligns himself most closely with those ideals? Everything now is either a popularity contest or a $ contest, but the truth of the matter is, the people will never be the winners in either of those.

    What is the purpose of posting here, when there can be no rational discourse? Can't we take a few deep breaths and then talk like we are all Spartans, all humans, and most likely on a personal basis, all pretty good people?

    We may disagree over many things, but in the past we were always able to hash things out like adults, make compromises, and move forward. Aren't you guys sick of how politics has turned into an all or nothing forum, where compromise is seen as a detriment?

    I felt the Pres tried earnestly (and apparently naively) to compromise, and got screwed on a few if not most occasions. Upcoming vote on the debt ceiling will be interesting. Mitt and Boehner will have their hands full towing the conservative/tea party line while also seeking the moderate republican votes needed during an election year.

    Any who, the thread was "Are you better off after 3 years"

    Nimrod

  • Nimrod said...

    Very well then - more tax breaks for the wealthy, and less funding for all of the public services you expect and think you deserve. You get what you invest in. You're funny as well - vitriol and all - I'll just take my pay cuts and do the best I can for your kids :)

    Why are Canadian teachers more effective than American teachers despite having much less money being spent on education?

    fallenangle

  • fallenangle said...

    Why are Canadian teachers more effective than American teachers despite having much less money being spent on education?

    Canadian teachers, at least in Ontario, and I am betting overall, are better paid than American teachers.

    "No one cares what you know, until they know how much you care." Mark Dantonio

    GTASpartan87

  • fallenangle said...

    Why are Canadian teachers more effective than American teachers despite having much less money being spent on education?

    Canadian schools don't need some of the other services required of American schools because their social safety net that include Provencial health care for all. Also means their school budgets aren't having a large portion sliced off for personnel's health coverage.

    Don't worry fallenschtick, soon the US spending on education will match US performance with other countries or worse if the folks you will be voting for in November get their way.

    GRR Spartan

  • doc_spartan said...

    We all have our philisophical points of view relative to the economic approach taken by this administration and previous administrations.

    We all speculate how the economy impacts the citizens of the US, but we know intimately how it affects us personally. How about we add our own personal facts to the equation?

    Here are the questions: - Are you employed now? - Have you lost your means of employment at any time during the last four years? - How has your company's gross sales changed over the last four years? - Have you been promoted / demoted? - How has your base salary changed? (exclude bonuses, exclude stock options, exclude benefits, do not adjust for inflation) - Has your benefits package changed substantially? - What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? To the extent you are self employed approximate the answers as best you can. If you are retired some of these questions apply, some do not. If you haven't entered the workforce yet skip adding your data.

    Are you employed now? - yes
    Have you lost your means of employment at any time during the last four years? - yes
    How has your company's gross sales changed over the last four years? - no idea, involves multiple companies
    Have you been promoted / demoted? - promoted
    How has your base salary changed? - increased by 30%
    Has your benefits package changed substantially? - same
    What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? N/A

    ming

  • doc_spartan said...

    We all have our philisophical points of view relative to the economic approach taken by this administration and previous administrations.

    We all speculate how the economy impacts the citizens of the US, but we know intimately how it affects us personally. How about we add our own personal facts to the equation?

    Here are the questions: - Are you employed now? - Have you lost your means of employment at any time during the last four years? - How has your company's gross sales changed over the last four years? - Have you been promoted / demoted? - How has your base salary changed? (exclude bonuses, exclude stock options, exclude benefits, do not adjust for inflation) - Has your benefits package changed substantially? - What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? To the extent you are self employed approximate the answers as best you can. If you are retired some of these questions apply, some do not. If you haven't entered the workforce yet skip adding your data.

    OK. I'll play along.

    Are you employed now? - Yes
    Have you lost your means of employment at any time during the last four years? - Been in the same job for 15 years
    How has your company's gross sales changed over the last four years? - If you consider number of students as number of customers then sales (enrollment) is up about 25% in last 4 years (about 70% in last 10 years).
    Have you been promoted / demoted? - Last promotion was 6 years ago. I'll be up for another promotion in about 2 years (need to publish a few more papers).
    How has your base salary changed? (exclude bonuses, exclude stock options, exclude benefits, do not adjust for inflation) - Over 4 years, salary is up about 3% not including some occasional merit bonuses but does include some summer salary from a new grant. They are projecting 2% increases this coming year.
    Has your benefits package changed substantially? - We now contribute slightly more to our retirement plan.
    What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? - I have no idea what this means.

    Research is what I am doing when I don’t know what I am doing - Werner von Braun

    Green Genes

  • This thread caught my interest (as you can see I don't post much), but there seems to be too much information and too many variables to extrapolate a consensus from the data. Ex:

    My net worth has gone down (house) but I don't plan on moving anytime soon.
    My income goes down each year due to rising health care/retirement costs, yet I love my job and don't plan on leaving it.
    Many of the decisions our leaders have made I believe have had a negative impact on our society, yet I remain positive about the captain of the boat.

    Continue on with the survey, but I will start a new and simpler thread with your assistance that may help cut to the chase. Just a few questions, such as:

    Are you currently financially stable
    Are you content with your life/socioeconomic status
    Who will you vote for

    What 3 questions would you ask?

    Nimrod

  • doc has joined the GOP question panel

    maybe doc should ask himself if he wants to turn the wheel back over to the same corporate ass worshipping clowns who drove the bus into the ditch in the first place.

    Romney gets elected my kids student loans jump
    I have to buy a separate health insurance policy for the kid in college
    Prices are still free market or in the case of oil and gas when ever they damned please. They are already rising.
    Since the new tax cut nirvana how many folks have seen their wages grow. Wages have been stagnant for a decade.
    Bonus? More upper level hourly have been flipped to salary to avoid overtime. What bonus?
    Company 401K plans have made most pensions a memory just like company participation in thr 401K

    GRR Spartan

  • Bump

    Nimrod

  • Sorry, just bumpin looking for input to my question above

    Nimrod

  • Green Genes
    What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? - I have no idea what this means.

    Good question

    Most companies have a range of bonus payout depending on company performance.

    If the company hits it's revenue targets it pays out 100% of targeted bonuses...if they fall below, bonuses are reduced, exceed bonuses are increase up to some max level.

    doc_spartan

  • GRR Spartan said...

    doc has joined the GOP question panel

    maybe doc should ask himself if he wants to turn the wheel back over to the same corporate ass worshipping clowns who drove the bus into the ditch in the first place.

    Romney gets elected my kids student loans jump
    I have to buy a separate health insurance policy for the kid in college
    Prices are still free market or in the case of oil and gas when ever they damned please. They are already rising.
    Since the new tax cut nirvana how many folks have seen their wages grow. Wages have been stagnant for a decade.
    Bonus? More upper level hourly have been flipped to salary to avoid overtime. What bonus?
    Company 401K plans have made most pensions a memory just like company participation in thr 401K

    Is it something I posted in this thread that convinces you I've changed my point of view?

    All I did was ask if each poster is better off vs the collective economy?

    doc_spartan

  • Nimrod said...

    This thread caught my interest (as you can see I don't post much), but there seems to be too much information and too many variables to extrapolate a consensus from the data. Ex:

    My net worth has gone down (house) but I don't plan on moving anytime soon. My income goes down each year due to rising health care/retirement costs, yet I love my job and don't plan on leaving it. Many of the decisions our leaders have made I believe have had a negative impact on our society, yet I remain positive about the captain of the boat.

    Continue on with the survey, but I will start a new and simpler thread with your assistance that may help cut to the chase. Just a few questions, such as:

    Are you currently financially stable Are you content with your life/socioeconomic status Who will you vote for

    What 3 questions would you ask?

    What's it like living in Watersmeet?

    "No one cares what you know, until they know how much you care." Mark Dantonio

    GTASpartan87

  • Nimrod said...

    This thread caught my interest (as you can see I don't post much), but there seems to be too much information and too many variables to extrapolate a consensus from the data. Ex:

    My net worth has gone down (house) but I don't plan on moving anytime soon. My income goes down each year due to rising health care/retirement costs, yet I love my job and don't plan on leaving it. Many of the decisions our leaders have made I believe have had a negative impact on our society, yet I remain positive about the captain of the boat.

    Continue on with the survey, but I will start a new and simpler thread with your assistance that may help cut to the chase. Just a few questions, such as:

    Are you currently financially stable Are you content with your life/socioeconomic status Who will you vote for

    What 3 questions would you ask?

    For me, the question "Are you better off" is not just about money but I understand why that is an important component.

    Financial stability is a good question. Our house has gone up in value since we bought it and we paid it off early. We don't have any debt and we live modestly so we feel pretty stable. A related question that I would ask is about job stability. I'm very happy with what I do, I am well respected among my peers and most administrators so I am pretty comfortable with my job stability. I've looked at a few options for better pay but nothing offers the same level of satisfaction.

    Contentedness with life/socioeconomic status is also a reasonable question although the answers you get might be misleading. I'm comfortable with my life/socioeconomic status but I am not content. I'm not interested in being a social climber but I would like to improve my situation so that I can do more. So I might change the wording.

    Who someone will vote for tells me nothing important.

    I would ask questions like - Who is most responsible for your current situation? What have you done in the past few years to improve your situation? What have you done in the past few years to improve the situation of others?

    Research is what I am doing when I don’t know what I am doing - Werner von Braun

    Green Genes

  • GTASpartan87 said...

    What's it like living in Watersmeet?

    I just had to look that up. How long did it take you to find the home of the Nimrods? biggrin

    Research is what I am doing when I don’t know what I am doing - Werner von Braun

    Green Genes

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Canadian schools don't need some of the other services required of American schools because their social safety net that include Provencial health care for all. Also means their school budgets aren't having a large portion sliced off for personnel's health coverage.

    Don't worry fallenschtick, soon the US spending on education will match US performance with other countries or worse if the folks you will be voting for in November get their way.

    they may not "need" them, but they certainly get them. Thanks to the collective bargaining prowess of their unions their benefits include supplementary health insurance, life insurance, retirement gratuities, etc....of course you also probably realize, but fail to mention, that Canadian teachers also have to pay into the social security system

    This post was edited by fallenangle on 5/20/2012 at 12:24 PM

    fallenangle

  • GTASpartan87 said...

    Canadian teachers, at least in Ontario, and I am betting overall, are better paid than American teachers.

    Interesting, so American teachers aren't motivated enough to provide top quality teaching or are you saying the talent pool isn't as rich to choose from because the best teachers that might be available are doing other work that pays more?

    This post was edited by fallenangle on 5/20/2012 at 12:27 PM

    fallenangle

  • Green Genes said...

    I just had to look that up. How long did it take you to find the home of the Nimrods? biggrin

    No need to look it up as I grew up not too far from Watersmeet.

    "No one cares what you know, until they know how much you care." Mark Dantonio

    GTASpartan87

  • fallenangle said...

    Interesting, so American teachers aren't motivated enough to provide top quality teaching or are you saying the talent pool isn't as rich to choose from because the best teachers that might be available are doing other work that pays more?

    I have a question for you. If you have a contract with your employer that spells out your job responsibilities, your salary and benefits and you go to work with the attitude you are being treated well you will do a good job won't you? Now what if your boss decides he needs more money for himself so he breaches the contract, and lowers your salary and benefits, but increases your responsibilities? Do you think that might affect your attitude? If you say no, you are a liar.

    This is what teachers face every day. High expectations in their job performance, but being demonized for expecting to be paid fairly for their efforts. I don't understand the mentality of people like you who want to bid out the education of the younger generation to the lowest bidder. I hate to break it to you, but when you expect a good job, you should expect to pay the price. You want A+ education for kids at F- prices. Maybe idiots like you should stop demeaning and start valuing those that are attempting to educate our kids instead of constantly blaming them for your personal shortcomings

    And no, I am not and have never been a teacher.

    This post was edited by Madhatter536 on 5/20/2012 at 6:50 PM

    Madhatter536

  • fallenangle said...

    Why are Canadian teachers more effective than American teachers despite having much less money being spent on education?

    Just pointing out another of your factually challenged posts....

    Isn't ironic that those on the right rarely are?

    "No one cares what you know, until they know how much you care." Mark Dantonio

    GTASpartan87

  • Madhatter536 said...

    I have a question for you. If you have a contract with your employer that spells out your job responsibilities, your salary and benefits and you go to work with the attitude you are being treated well you will do a good job won't you? Now what if your boss decides he needs more money for himself so he breaches the contract, and lowers your salary and benefits, but increases your responsibilities? Do you think that might affect your attitude? If you say no, you are a liar.

    This is what teachers face every day. High expectations in their job performance, but being demonized for expecting to be paid fairly for their efforts. I don't understand the mentality of people like you who want to bid out the education of the younger generation to the lowest bidder. I hate to break it to you, but when you expect a good job, you should expect to pay the price. You want A+ education for kids at F- prices. Maybe idiots like you should stop demeaning and start valuing those that are attempting to educate our kids instead of constantly blaming them for your personal shortcomings

    And no, I am not and have never been a teacher.

    US ranks:
    14th Reading
    25th Math
    17th Science

    US education spending per child $7,743 ranking #1 ( I know the graph is hard to see..but the big purple circle is US spending per child and the much smaller circles are other countries).

    Pretty poor ratings for A+ spending on education.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by lars on 5/21/2012 at 12:00 PM

    World education rankings: which country does best at reading, maths and science? | News | guardian.co.uk

    The OECD's comprehensive world education ranking report, PISA, is out. Find out how each country compares

    www.guardian.co.uk

    U.S. Education Spending & Student Performance vs. The World Infographic | MAT@USC

    An informative infographic that compares the U.S. education spending and performance versus the rest of the world. See how your country stacks up.

    mat.usc.edu
    attachment

    lars

  • doc_spartan said...

    We all have our philisophical points of view relative to the economic approach taken by this administration and previous administrations.

    We all speculate how the economy impacts the citizens of the US, but we know intimately how it affects us personally. How about we add our own personal facts to the equation?

    Here are the questions: - Are you employed now? - Have you lost your means of employment at any time during the last four years? - How has your company's gross sales changed over the last four years? - Have you been promoted / demoted? - How has your base salary changed? (exclude bonuses, exclude stock options, exclude benefits, do not adjust for inflation) - Has your benefits package changed substantially? - What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? To the extent you are self employed approximate the answers as best you can. If you are retired some of these questions apply, some do not. If you haven't entered the workforce yet skip adding your data.

    Here are the questions:
    - Are you employed now? Technically
    - Have you lost your means of employment at any time during the last four years? Yes
    - How has your company's gross sales changed over the last four years? Changed jobs multiple times
    - Have you been promoted / demoted? No
    - How has your base salary changed? (exclude bonuses, exclude stock options, exclude benefits, do not adjust for inflation) Yes
    - Has your benefits package changed substantially? No
    - What has been the % of target bonus pay out for your company on average? Too much math

    What is that, a Titleist? A hole in one...

    Cosmo_Kramer

  • lars said...

    US ranks: 14th Reading 25th Math 17th Science

    US education spending per child $7,743 ranking #1 ( I know the graph is hard to see..but the big purple circle is US spending per child and the much smaller circles are other countries).

    Pretty poor ratings for A+ spending on education.

    Yeah, but most of the money doesn't go towards teacher salaries which have been stagnant at best, and falling overall. The administrators on the other hand have seen huge salary boosts. Plus there is a lot of the funds being channeled into areas other than academics. More money than ever is being spent on sports programs, money that used to go to the real purpose of schools, educating in the class rooms.

    The falling standards are not because teachers can't or won't teach. It's because to many outside and ill informed people make decisions about what can be taught and how. Way way way too much time is spent teaching to mandated tests instead of actual teaching for education. The elimination of idiotic testing, the MEAP in Michigan for example, would allow teachers the time they need to actually teach the kids what they need to learn. That isn't possible because so much pressure is placed on teachers and students to score well on the stupid mandated state tests that learn takes a back seat. That is the real problem and the cause of the decline in education standings. dubya's no child left behind program was and is a huge waste of time and money. And it was forced into being by conservatives with one goal in mind. To make money for the test developers.

    So yes, a lot of money is spent per pupil. But the majority of it isn't spent ON TEACHING the students. It's spent enriching outside interests.

    Madhatter536

  • Madhatter536 said...

    Yeah, but most of the money doesn't go towards teacher salaries which have been stagnant at best, and falling overall. The administrators on the other hand have seen huge salary boosts. Plus there is a lot of the funds being channeled into areas other than academics. More money than ever is being spent on sports programs, money that used to go to the real purpose of schools, educating in the class rooms.

    The falling standards are not because teachers can't or won't teach. It's because to many outside and ill informed people make decisions about what can be taught and how. Way way way too much time is spent teaching to mandated tests instead of actual teaching for education. The elimination of idiotic testing, the MEAP in Michigan for example, would allow teachers the time they need to actually teach the kids what they need to learn. That isn't possible because so much pressure is placed on teachers and students to score well on the stupid mandated state tests that learn takes a back seat. That is the real problem and the cause of the decline in education standings. dubya's no child left behind program was and is a huge waste of time and money. And it was forced into being by conservatives with one goal in mind. To make money for the test developers.

    So yes, a lot of money is spent per pupil. But the majority of it isn't spent ON TEACHING the students. It's spent enriching outside interests.

    Maybe US kids don't want to study as hard is kids in other developed countries do.

    spartanMF

  • spartanMF said...

    Maybe US kids don't want to study as hard is kids in other developed countries do.

    Not true, but nice try at demonizing American's. Why do you hate American school kids?

    Madhatter536