Online Now 2264

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

On this Board 98
Record: 3425 (1/27/2013)

Online now 2409
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Bachmann goes batty AGAIN

  • fallenangle said...

    That's EXACTLY what we are talking about in this thread LOL..and Bachmann never said anything that contradicts your view of her,.but it's good to know that you know more about her than a sitting member on the INTELLIGENCE committee, maybe you should run for office one of these days?

    So let me ask you this then genius...

    If Bachmann just wanted a "review" of qualifying procedures because she was afraid the Muslim Brotherhood might have infiltrated the government, why single out one or two people?

    I know you're just being an ass about it to defend Bachmann for whatever silly reason but ANY reasonable person is going to see that she is clearly attacking.

    Let's use this hypothetical. If I and a few others sent a letter to your boss questioning his policy of letting certain people work there and I used your name specifically, wouldn't you feel like it was an attack? And wouldn't you continue to feel attacked if the HR person asked why I mentioned you specifically and I responded with a bunch more stuff about you?

    Would you believe me if I said, "I just wanted the president of your company to review his hiring practices."

    MSULordyoda

  • MSchott said...

    it's about the letter from Bachmann and others that targets Amedin. I know it's you tactic to avoid questions that you can't answer to your benefit and change the topic.

    Pot meet kettle

    "Please quote Bachmann's exact words that you call an attack"

    ...crickets.....crickets.....

    fallenangle

  • MSULordyoda said...

    So let me ask you this then genius...

    If Bachmann just wanted a "review" of qualifying procedures because she was afraid the Muslim Brotherhood might have infiltrated the government, why single out one or two people?

    I know you're just being an ass about it to defend Bachmann for whatever silly reason but ANY reasonable person is going to see that she is clearly attacking.

    Let's use this hypothetical. If I and a few others sent a letter to your boss questioning his policy of letting certain people work there and I used your name specifically, wouldn't you feel like it was an attack? And wouldn't you continue to feel attacked if the HR person asked why I mentioned you specifically and I responded with a bunch more stuff about you?

    Would you believe me if I said, "I just wanted the president of your company to review his hiring practices."

    If you were to call the police because you suspect a crime took place, if you don't give any names do you really expect them to conduct an investigation without any suspects/evidence? Of course not.. It's not so much about specific people as it is specific policies that have been conducted which is a sharp change from previous policies and she would like to find out why. I mean if you don't want your congressmen to do their jobs then why do you vote for them? Would you be equally as obstructive if a Democrat requested an inquiry because it was discovered in 2003 that the main advisor to Secretary of State Powell had family members who were in Al Qaeda, would you be an ass for supporting him/her?

    Your hypothetical is apples and oranges, she's not questioning any policy, she's asking why they're not adhering to the policy that is in place and has been in place since the inception of th

    e Department

    And did you see the findings of the Ft Hood massacre investigation? The reason the killer's radical Islamic views weren't discovered prior to all those servicemen getting slaughtered was because they gave him the "PC" treatment because of his religion. Disgusting...don't need that happening on an even bigger scale with the Brotherhood

    This post was edited by fallenangle on 7/25/2012 at 11:37 AM

    fallenangle

  • LOL, beautiful...absolutely beautiful!!!!

    Gohmert to ‘numbnuts’ McCain: Shut up about Bachmann’s anti-Muslim attacks | The Raw Story

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/24/gohmert-to-numbnuts-mccain-shut-up-about-bachmann%E2%80%99s-anti-muslim-attacks/

    www.rawstory.com

    fallenangle

  • ah yes, Louis Gohmert, the nutjob who was the first to exploit the Aurora shootings by saying it was the fault of "ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs" and the guy watching over his shoulder for "terror babies." Great guy you are promoting there, Fantasy and Fiction Boy.

    Louie Gohmert: Aurora Shootings Result Of 'Ongoing Attacks On Judeo-Christian Beliefs'

    WASHINGTON -- Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) said Friday that the shootings that took place in an Aurora, Colo. movie theater hours earlier were a result of show, Gohmert was asked why he believes such senseless acts of violence take place.

    www.huffingtonpost.com

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo

  • fallenangle said...

    LOL, beautiful...absolutely beautiful!!!!

    If figures you would support one of the dumbest people in the House given the fact you two are intellectual equals.lol

    Madhatter536

  • Madhatter536 said...

    If figures you would support one of the dumbest people in the House given the fact you two are intellectual equals.lol

    damn, why are you insulting Gohmert, hatter?

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo

  • Madhatter536 said...

    If figures you would support one of the dumbest people in the House given the fact you two are intellectual equals.

    I can only imagine the comments you and Enrico Goebbels made towards McCain in 08....I'm sure numbnuts would have been Rated G compared to your vitriol

    fallenangle

  • fallenangle said...

    I can only imagine the comments you and Enrico Goebbels made towards McCain in 08....I'm sure numbnuts would have been Rated G compared to your vitriol

    I worked for McCain in 2000, FFB. I was also on the fence about the election up until the selection of Palin. I earned more respect for him after reading "Game Change," particularly the way he A) didn't want to run a negative campaign and B) refused to do the race baiting (e.g. the woman saying Obama is an Arab) that people like you are all about.

    But keep on "imagining" Fantasy and Fiction Boy. Your posts demonstrate a wild and vivid imagination!

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo