Online Now 1722

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

On this Board 78
Record: 3425 (1/27/2013)

Online now 1638
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Catholic Church's hypocrisy re: contraception

  • Why does NOBODY call out the Catholic Church on the fact that they accept religious tax breaks, charity tax breaks and funding assistance, etc from the government and then freak out when that government expects concessions in return? You really expect to make a deal with the devil and never face the consequences?

    At first glance during this debate, I supported the Catholics. You know, religious freedom and all that. But then I realized this, and my support tempered. If the Catholics renounce all tax breaks and government funding for their schools, THEN they have the right to do whatever they please.

    AtlantaMSU

  • AtlantaMSU said...

    Why does NOBODY call out the Catholic Church on the fact that they accept religious tax breaks, charity tax breaks and funding assistance, etc from the government and then freak out when that government expects concessions in return? You really expect to make a deal with the devil and never face the consequences?

    At first glance during this debate, I supported the Catholics. You know, religious freedom and all that. But then I realized this, and my support tempered. If the Catholics renounce all tax breaks and government funding for their schools, THEN they have the right to do whatever they please.

    I don't want the government touching any part of any religion. You shouldn't either. I could care if you have a gripe with the Catholic religion, so do I, but what you recommend is way out of bounds. Find another solution.

    MasonDelhiGuy

  • AtlantaMSU said...

    Why does NOBODY call out the Catholic Church on the fact that they accept religious tax breaks, charity tax breaks and funding assistance, etc from the government and then freak out when that government expects concessions in return? You really expect to make a deal with the devil and never face the consequences?

    At first glance during this debate, I supported the Catholics. You know, religious freedom and all that. But then I realized this, and my support tempered. If the Catholics renounce all tax breaks and government funding for their schools, THEN they have the right to do whatever they please.

    Spend some time with your local Catholic church. See what the members do day in and day out for the less fortunate in their community. Then come back and tell us about their hypocrisy...

    'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable' - President John F. Kennedy

    WixomSpartan

  • WixomSpartan said...

    Spend some time with your local Catholic church. See what the members do day in and day out for the less fortunate in their community. Then come back and tell us about their hypocrisy...

    The hypocrisy lies with the leaders of the Catholic Church, not the membership.

    Madhatter536

  • So, it's not hypocritical to accept tax breaks from the snake that is the federal government and then act ASTONISHED when the regulations start to happen? They really expected to make a deal that is too good to be true with the federal effing government?

    Btw, I still don't support the contraception mandate at all. My view just shifted to more of a 'fuck both sides', although I definitely don't believe that the government can tell what employers must cover on their health insurance. And, have no problem with Catholics at all. My reaction would be the same whether this involved Catholics, Muslims, Lutherans, Baptists, or atheists.

    This post was edited by AtlantaMSU on 6/9/2012 at 7:59 AM

    AtlantaMSU

  • I think religious institutions are a unique animal in terms of the role they play in society.

    I assume, that the reason they have been supported by federal tax breaks is so they can fulfill a significant role in society that the government now does not have to.

    It is a quid pro qou in essence.

    I could flip your statement on it;s head by asking, Why is the govt surprised that the religious people are upset at intrusions into their moral and ethical beliefs? Why did they make this deal with God if they knew certain regulations could hurt this?

    Until we get to a point in this country where morals and ethics play no role in how our society operates it is unreasonable to think there wouldn't be push back on things like this.

    If the goal is to take all social services away from locally operated religious institutions and have the govt control all of that, then I would understand. But I would be loathed to think that the govt is a better alternative to religious institutions in handing out the services.

    CincySpartan

  • AtlantaMSU said...

    So, it's not hypocritical to accept tax breaks from the snake that is the federal government and then act ASTONISHED when the regulations start to happen? They really expected to make a deal that is too good to be true with the federal effing government?

    Btw, I still don't support the contraception mandate at all. My view just shifted to more of a 'fuck both sides', although I definitely don't believe that the government can tell what employers must cover on their health insurance. And, have no problem with Catholics at all. My reaction would be the same whether this involved Catholics, Muslims, Lutherans, Baptists, or atheists.

    NUCKY being a cock again.

    This post was edited by Tanfan on 6/11/2012 at 9:14 PM

    Keeping the sunshiners in check since 2000.

    Tanfan

  • MasonDelhiGuy said...

    I don't want the government touching any part of any religion. You shouldn't either. I could care if you have a gripe with the Catholic religion, so do I, but what you recommend is way out of bounds. Find another solution.

    A few weeks ago Roman Catholic churches in the Seattle area with encouragement of their bishop set up tents on the church grounds just outside of the front entrances for their parishoners to sign petitions to enable businesses to remove birth control from health insurance. Not just churches but any business owner.

    To me that's crossing the line. Those churches made a cogent decision to become poltical on their property. They should lose their non-taxable status. Start paying property taxes to their community and so on.

    GRR Spartan

  • GRR Spartan said...

    A few weeks ago Roman Catholic churches in the Seattle area with encouragement of their bishop set up tents on the church grounds just outside of the front entrances for their parishoners to sign petitions to enable businesses to remove birth control from health insurance. Not just churches but any business owner.

    To me that's crossing the line. Those churches made a cogent decision to become poltical on their property. They should lose their non-taxable status. Start paying property taxes to their community and so on.

    Exactly.

    If they take a tax break, they should not be surprised when their government expects them to fall in line to receive such a break. They don't like it, pay the taxes. The end.

    FearsomePenguin

  • GRR Spartan said...

    A few weeks ago Roman Catholic churches in the Seattle area with encouragement of their bishop set up tents on the church grounds just outside of the front entrances for their parishoners to sign petitions to enable businesses to remove birth control from health insurance. Not just churches but any business owner.

    To me that's crossing the line. Those churches made a cogent decision to become poltical on their property. They should lose their non-taxable status. Start paying property taxes to their community and so on.

    I agree, that's taking things a little too far as far as the Church doing that.

    MSULordyoda

  • FearsomePenguin said...

    If they take a tax break, they should not be surprised when their government expects them to fall in line to receive such a break. They don't like it, pay the taxes. The end.

    Bingo!

    Narwhal

  • Bob Sakimano said...

    you're honestly expecting intellectual honesty from a church that condones the rape of little boys?

    Bob, do you believe the National Education Association condones the sexual abuse of students by their teachers?

    'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable' - President John F. Kennedy

    WixomSpartan

  • WixomSpartan said...

    Bob, do you believe the National Education Association condones the sexual abuse of students by their teachers?

    Do you have personal experience with this or just repeating crap?

    I'm leaning towards crap.

    GRR Spartan

  • AtlantaMSU said...

    Why does NOBODY call out the Catholic Church on the fact that they accept religious tax breaks, charity tax breaks and funding assistance, etc from the government and then freak out when that government expects concessions in return? You really expect to make a deal with the devil and never face the consequences?

    At first glance during this debate, I supported the Catholics. You know, religious freedom and all that. But then I realized this, and my support tempered. If the Catholics renounce all tax breaks and government funding for their schools, THEN they have the right to do whatever they please.

    I'd like to see what government funding for schools that they get.

    However, I agree that there is hypocrisy in their position not in what you cite.

    Spartytruth

  • You can separate the Church and the schools from the argument since they do not get government funding. However, hospitals and the like who employ non-Catholics and accept government funding should not be exempt from providing the minimum services mandated by government.

    My beef with the Bishops is that they are advocating be exempt from government intrusion except where it benefits them IE - SEXUAL ABUSE coverups and statute of limitations, etc.

    Spartytruth

  • WixomSpartan said...

    Spend some time with your local Catholic church. See what the members do day in and day out for the less fortunate in their community. Then come back and tell us about their hypocrisy...

    you mean like the Vatican reprimanding nuns for engaging in social justice activities, or leadership, including the head of the Catholic Church in American paying off pedophile priests?

    Yes, the LEADERSHIP of the Catholic Church is hypocrites.

    Of course, this whole opposition to contraception would be moot if young boys could get pregnant.

    Vatican Reprimands U.S. Nuns Group - NYTimes.com

    The Leadership Conference of Women Religious has “serious doctrinal problems,” the church said as it appointed an American bishop to rein the group in.

    www.nytimes.com

    Cardinal Timothy Dolan Allegedly Paid Suspected Pedophile Priests To Leave Ministry While Head Of Archdiocese Of Milwaukee

    MILWAUKEE (AP) -- The Archdiocese of Milwaukee confirmed Wednesday that it had a policy to pay suspected pedophile priests to leave the ministry. The acknowledgement was prompted by a document made public by abuse victims who accepted a return to the laity.

    www.huffingtonpost.com

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo

  • Bob Sakimano said...

    no.. are there documented cases of teacher-on pupil-rape where teachers aren't investigated and (if deemed necessary) charged accordingly?


    'Now, on the heels of the Catholic abuse scandal comes another of historic proportions—one that has the potential to be much greater and far-reaching. According to a draft report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education, in compliance with the 2002 "No Child Left Behind" act signed into law by President Bush, between 6 percent and 10 percent of public school children across the country have been sexually abused or harassed by school employees and teachers.

    Charol Shakeshaft, the Hofstra University scholar who prepared the report, said the number of abuse cases—which range from unwanted sexual comments to rape—could be much higher.
    Such figures led her to contend "the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."'

    Sexual abuse of children is horrible no matter who does it. Every case should be prosecuted without bias. I would hope we all could agree on that...

    http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/4/5/01552.shtml

    'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable' - President John F. Kennedy

    WixomSpartan

  • Enrico Palazzo said...

    you mean like the Vatican reprimanding nuns for engaging in social justice activities, or leadership, including the head of the Catholic Church in American paying off pedophile priests?

    Yes, the LEADERSHIP of the Catholic Church is hypocrites.

    Of course, this whole opposition to contraception would be moot if young boys could get pregnant.

    Like you give a crap how the Vatican treats a Catholic religious order...lol

    'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable' - President John F. Kennedy

    WixomSpartan

  • WixomSpartan said...

    Like you give a crap how the Vatican treats a Catholic religious order...lol

    I just find it rather amusing that the leadership of the Catholic Church would reprimand members of their flock for doing charity work and telling them to instead focus on the evils of contraception and gay marriage. But that's where religion has gone today - indoctrination or their mythology over social justice and helping the less fortunate. They've basically become Republicans (complete with secret homosexuality too!).

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo

  • Bob Sakimano said...

    they should join the priesthood..

    doubtful...priests don't have a union wink_msu

    'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable' - President John F. Kennedy

    WixomSpartan

  • WixomSpartan said...

    doubtful...priests don't have a union wink_msu

    Actually, the priesthood is one huge union.

    Madhatter536

  • WixomSpartan said...

    'Now, on the heels of the Catholic abuse scandal comes another of historic proportions—one that has the potential to be much greater and far-reaching. According to a draft report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education, in compliance with the 2002 "No Child Left Behind" act signed into law by President Bush, between 6 percent and 10 percent of public school children across the country have been sexually abused or harassed by school employees and teachers.

    Charol Shakeshaft, the Hofstra University scholar who prepared the report, said the number of abuse cases—which range from unwanted sexual comments to rape—could be much higher. Such figures led her to contend "the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."'

    Sexual abuse of children is horrible no matter who does it. Every case should be prosecuted without bias. I would hope we all could agree on that...

    http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/4/5/01552.shtml

    lol Newsmax!

    They have as much credibility as this guy.

    attachment

    Nommad

  • Wixom reads newsmax?

    Things are starting to make more sense. I thought he was smarter than that.
    Newsmax is the National Enquirer of political reporting.

    GRR Spartan

  • A group that does not pay taxes influencing public policy - something up with that

    Nimrod

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Wixom reads newsmax?

    Things are starting to make more sense. I thought he was smarter than that. Newsmax is the National Enquirer of political reporting.

    damn, that's harsh on the National Enquirer. They actually get some things right (John Edwards). I'd say it's more like the Weekly World News. The Obama they have created is slightly less realistic than Bat Boy.

    "If you have the right to be offended I have the right to offend you." - Ricky Gervais

    Enrico Palazzo