Wells Hall Off Topic Board

Syracuse, NY has experienced snowfall nearly 60 inches below normal this winter. No, nothing to see there....

Yet Europe has set records for cold temperatures and snow fall. Alaska and Canada have experienced much colder than normal temperatures. Parts of Japan have experienced much more snow than normal.

So because the US has experienced a warmer than normal winter it's all AGW eh?

Additionally, the UAH anomaly was actually NEGATIVE for January.

I was just reminisching about bob's dumb ass weather reports, but if you want to say it's AGCC, then that's up to you.

In that thread you argued that global warming was the cause of the coldest winter in eons over in Europe.

Now in this thread you imply that global warming is the cause of our warm winter

This is called "using science" by Uncle Rico

wrong. I may chime in for a post or two to destroy any semblance of a point you were trying to make, but you aren't worth much of my time. Truth is, you can't hang.

This is my thread, idiot.

Seriously, RQA, you have to be the dumbest regular poster on this board. I'm not sure what's wrong with you, but please, for the sake of humanity, don't procreate.

Being closed minded to all science has left you ignorant of how warming does indeed cause some locales to become colder. It's too bad you spend your life in utter ignorance when the alternative is so much better.

it causes abnormal temperature conditions. Go back and read the articles that completely refuted your bullshit in a previous thread. I'm sorry you cannot accept scientific facts and you think you know more than people who make a living studying climate patterns.

It's all in you are raised I guess. RQA's parents didn't teach him the difference between good attention and bad attention.

I feel bad for you.

yeah, I could see how a scientific study would be a threat to your general ignorance and denial. Just because lack the ability form opinions from anyone other than uneducated talking heads on the radio doesn't mean you know more than those who study climate for a living. In fact, I think scientists could be occupied for years trying to find anyone who is more ignorant than you are. You attack the source but not the substance. Sounds about right.

Here are some more sources for you to try and refute. Let us know when you publish your scientific research. I'm sure Dumbass Monthly is taking submissions these days.

It's YOU that doesn't understand, not me. Go ahead and remain ignorant about the science behind climate change. It's your right to be ignorant if you so choose. Just don't try to tell people that have done actual research that you know what you are talking about when it is totally apparent you don't.