Online Now 3342

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

On this Board 99
Record: 3425 (1/27/2013)

Online now 3443
Record: 10351 (3/11/2012)

Boards ▾

MSU Red Cedar Message Board

The largest and most active MSU Spartans board on the web

The Press Box

The place to ask questions to SpartanTailgate's recruiting experts

Duffy Daugherty Forum

"The Duff" is dedicated to Michigan State football recruiting discussion

Jack Breslin Forum

"The Bres" is dedicated to Michigan State basketball recruiting discussion

Wells Hall Off Topic Board

This is your pulpit to preach to the masses about everything from politics to religion

Marketplace & Ticket Exchange

The place to buy, trade or sell Michigan State tickets

Fantasy Sports Forum

For fantasy football and other fantasy sports discussion

Test/Feedback Forum

Reply

Obama Lectures Supreme Court About "Judicial Activism"

  • oblahma is just going to blame the court for taking away "access", etc... from women and children and He alone must be re-elected to prevent the court from continuing their war on women and children. He needs bogeymen and this is a nothing but another political ploy for his uneducated base.

    FC Juventus

  • Its striking that the Left has for the most part NOT commented on this thread....well other than the occasional "he still knows more than you" comment.

    Speaks volumes that The Left hasn't defended the President on his comments he made.

    Contrarian

  • Contrarian said...

    Its striking that the Left has for the most part NOT commented on this thread....well other than the occasional "he still knows more than you" comment.

    Speaks volumes that The Left hasn't defended the President on his comments he made.

    No it does not. They are not defendable. Why would you comment?

    Gregoryspartan

  • Gregoryspartan said...

    No it does not. They are not defendable. Why would you comment?

    Oh but they usually attempt to anyway. It not being defendable never has stopped them before.

    Contrarian

  • Never figured out why folks who agree with the current administration are stupid and political positions aren't defendable

    Is that the only way you can justify your ideas?

    GRR Spartan

  • GRR Spartan said...

    Never figured out why folks who agree with the current administration are stupid and political positions aren't defendable

    Is that the only way you can justify your ideas?

    No GRR, don't generalize my comment. I'm talking about this issue in this thread.

    Defend the Presidents comments GRR. Or do you want me to do it for you? His propaganda minister walked his comments back today.

    This post was edited by Contrarian on 4/4/2012 at 3:38 PM

    Contrarian

  • Bullwrinkle said...

    Look it's been clear from day one that Obama was horribly unprepared to be president and has been an amateurish disaster, but I always thought he was very bright. But you've got to be a moron to talk down to the SCOTUS when they are pondering your monumental health care acheivement...one of the few things you actually got passed. What was he thinking? This is Biden level stupidity.

    The propaganda has been that he is smart, but let's face it there is no evidence of it. He cannot even produce a transcript from any school he has ever attended. Is it any wonder, it would only confirm the impression he has made.

    Green Note ●

  • Contrarian said...

    No GRR, don't generalize my comment. I'm talking about this issue in this thread.

    Defend the Presidents comments GRR. Or do you want me to do it for you? His propaganda minister walked his comments back today.

    I was unaware of a propganda minister.

    Could you please link me to the White House site where that position is listed?

    Grow up. It is a hotly contested issue, its an election year and we also have a SCOTUS that settled Citizen's United 5-4. This is all political theater and the 5-4 decision by the the case mentioned is just more fuel to the fire that the President is willing to use to see if he can sway 1 justice to 5-4 uphold or maybe 2 for a 6-3 ruling.

    But we know there will be those on the court working to convince another justice to strike down for a 6-3 in that direction too.

    Its setting up to be an election of "conservatives" vs Obama if the president's campaign have their way. That's the way they want to frame the election. For them if they see The Medical Act of 2010 upheld 5-4 they claim victory.

    Not that complicated or sinister.

    GRR Spartan

  • FC Juventus said...

    He needs bogeymen and this is a nothing but another political ploy for his uneducated base.

    Hey! Haven't you heard? Only Republicans try to define their opponents in a negative light then run against them..slap

    'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable' - President John F. Kennedy

    WixomSpartan ●

  • WixomSpartan said...

    Hey! Haven't you heard? Only Republicans try to define their opponents in a negative light then run against them..slap

    Congratulations, you are learning the game. Both sides play in the same sandbox.

    GRR Spartan

  • GRR Spartan said...

    I was unaware of a propganda minister.

    Could you please link me to the White House site where that position is listed?

    Grow up. It is a hotly contested issue, its an election year and we also have a SCOTUS that settled Citizen's United 5-4. This is all political theater and the 5-4 decision by the the case mentioned is just more fuel to the fire that the President is willing to use to see if he can sway 1 justice to 5-4 uphold or maybe 2 for a 6-3 ruling.

    But we know there will be those on the court working to convince another justice to strike down for a 6-3 in that direction too.

    Its setting up to be an election of "conservatives" vs Obama if the president's campaign have their way. That's the way they want to frame the election. For them if they see The Medical Act of 2010 upheld 5-4 they claim victory.

    Not that complicated or sinister.

    Ok so you are on record as not being able to defend the Pres on his comments yesterday....gotcha

    I give you a lot of credit though...you're about the only lib willing to show his face in this thread.

    Contrarian

  • Contrarian said...

    Ok so you are on record as not being able to defend the Pres on his comments yesterday....gotcha

    I give you a lot of credit though...you're about the only lib willing to show his face in this thread.

    There isn't any need to defend his remarks. He stated his opinion, which if I remember correctly is gauranteed by the First Amendment. Or doesn't that apply to black people anymore?

    Madhatter536

  • Madhatter536 said...

    There isn't any need to defend his remarks. He stated his opinion, which if I remember correctly is gauranteed by the First Amendment. Or doesn't that apply to black people anymore?

    Why am I not surprised that a Dem showed up and is trying to make this about the color of a man's skin?

    Hey! You also forgot to accuse me of being a shtick! Didn't you get the memo from the Wells Hall Liberal Association? That's supposed to be SOP for any Dem who can't defend lib policies....its listed under the "If All Else Fails" section.

    Contrarian

  • Contrarian said...

    Why am I not surprised that a Dem showed up and is trying to make this about the color of a man's skin?

    Hey! You also forgot to accuse me of being a shtick! Didn't you get the memo from the Wells Hall Liberal Association? That's supposed to be SOP for any Dem who can't defend lib policies....its listed under the "If All Else Fails" section.

    I'm not a dem. I'm a liberal with no party affiliation. I am not a dem because I don't know what they stand for, and I'm not a repub because I DO know what they stand for.

    The entire problem the repubs are having with Obama for what he said about activist judges is that they are mad he stole their schtick.

    Madhatter536

  • Madhatter536 said...

    I'm not a dem. I'm a liberal with no party affiliation. I am not a dem because I don't know what they stand for, and I'm not a repub because I DO know what they stand for.

    The entire problem the repubs are having with Obama for what he said about activist judges is that they are mad he stole their schtick.

    If you know what the GOP stands for, let the rest of us know... because we have no idea.

    Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity. - Frank Leahy.-- If you're going to be stupid, be smart about it. - Mike Milbury

    Bullwrinkle

Michigan State
247Sports
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports