-
Compound 2 ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
5318 votes total - (9023)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Carolina Sparty
- 5 stars Rating: 86
711 votes total - (3075)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Compound 2 ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
5318 votes total - (9023)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
TravelinMan
- 5 stars Rating: 90
3396 votes total - (5937)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Murky Waters ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
2586 votes total - (2473)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Murky Waters said...
The issue I’m addressing is in answer to the “nuance” above that it was “okay” for Clinton to put to death Ricky Ray because he knew what he was doing when he committed the crime – that it wasn’t until after the crime that he became a vegetable.
Everyone with me so far?
Madhatter536
- 4 stars Rating: 76
9577 votes total - (12741)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Carolina Sparty
- 5 stars Rating: 86
711 votes total - (3075)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Madhatter536 said...
No one has said that Clinton's execution of Ray was okay. In fact I said just the opposite. I simply pointed out that Mr. Ray's diminished mental capacity was self induced, which it was, and that he wasn't mentally diminished when he committed his crime. Therein lies the difference between the two cases. That you cannot grasp the truth and facts is no surprise however.
Murky Waters ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
2586 votes total - (2473)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Madhatter536
- 4 stars Rating: 76
9577 votes total - (12741)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TravelinMan
- 5 stars Rating: 90
3396 votes total - (5937)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Compound 2 ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
5318 votes total - (9023)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
TravelinMan
- 5 stars Rating: 90
3396 votes total - (5937)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
FC Juventus
- 5 stars Rating: 82
673 votes total - the giants of italian football
- (1135)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Madhatter536
- 4 stars Rating: 76
9577 votes total - (12741)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Cym Jim said...
Not sure. The OP was clearly using the term in a neutral rather than pejorative sense, and that is what is important here. It's clearly acceptable to refer to someone as being "retarded", e.g. from the article:
"-- Texas authorities executed Marvin Wilson, a 54-year-old death row inmate, on Tuesday night after his attorneys failed to convince state and federal courts that he was mentally retarded and ineligible for the death penalty under a 2002 Supreme Court ruling."
But is someone who is legally retarded not a retard, or is the latter only used as an insult these days? Similar to spastic perhaps? It was once an acceptable way to refer to someone with spasticity, but soon became a derogatory term. Apparently this is described as the euphemism treadmill, in which euphemisms evolve over time into taboo words and negative connotations crowd out neutral ones, requiring new neutral terms, e.g.
lame → crippled → spastic → handicapped → disabled → physically challenged → differently abled → People with Disabilities
Interesting stuff, and I'm glad we could have such a civilized conversation about language. Now, back to work you Mongoloid cretins
.
-
Madhatter536
- 4 stars Rating: 76
9577 votes total - (12741)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Compound 2 ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
5318 votes total - (9023)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Compound 2 ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
5318 votes total - (9023)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
TravelinMan
- 5 stars Rating: 90
3396 votes total - (5937)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Madhatter536
- 4 stars Rating: 76
9577 votes total - (12741)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Madhatter536
- 4 stars Rating: 76
9577 votes total - (12741)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3




Texas Executes Retard